Le 04/01/2011 09:04, Alexander Holler a écrit :
Am 04.01.2011 08:47, schrieb Alexander Holler:
Only CONFIG_CMD_SHA1SUM should have been used.
---
README |2 +-
common/cmd_mem.c |4 ++--
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Sorry, have forgotten that
Hi Albert,
On Saturday 08 January 2011 12:24 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Aneesh,
Le 22/12/2010 12:54, Aneesh V a écrit :
- Enable I-cache on bootup
- Enable MMU and D-cache immediately after relocation
- Do necessary initialization before enabling d-cache and MMU
- Changes to
John,
On Saturday 08 January 2011 12:16 PM, John Rigby wrote:
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Aneesh Vane...@ti.com wrote:
Hi John,
On Tuesday 28 December 2010 06:17 AM, John Rigby wrote:
Signed-off-by: John Rigbyjohn.ri...@linaro.org
+
+void board_init_f(unsigned long bootflag)
+{
+
Le 08/01/2011 07:36, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit :
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/config.mk
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/config.mk
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
PLATFORM_RELFLAGS += -fno-common -ffixed-r8 -msoft-float
# Make ARMv5 to allow more compilers to work, even though its v7a.
-PLATFORM_CPPFLAGS +=
Hi Albert,
On Saturday 08 January 2011 12:34 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Aneesh,
Le 22/12/2010 12:54, Aneesh V a écrit :
1. make sure that page table setup is not done multiple times
2. flush_dcache_all() is more appropriate while disabling cache
than a range flush on the entire
I'm working on adding EHCI support for our chips to U-Boot and I'm a bit
confused. In our case I have to replace the ehci_read/writel macros since all
of our EHCI registers are located starting at 0x800016F000400 (notice it's
a 64-bit address).
Anyway, to get back to my comment, it seems
Hi Albert,
On Saturday 08 January 2011 12:06 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Aneesh,
Le 22/12/2010 12:54, Aneesh V a écrit :
- Add a framework for layered cache maintenance
- separate out SOC specific outer cache maintenance from
maintenance of caches known to CPU
- Add generic
Dear Minkyu Kang,
Am 27.12.2010 um 11:27 schrieb Minkyu Kang:
There is possibility that pointers set to NULL before relocation.
In this case, system is hang, because of r0 is invalid location in RAM.
Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang mk7.k...@samsung.com
---
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/start.S |3 +++
Le 08/01/2011 11:32, Andreas Bießmann a écrit :
Dear Minkyu Kang,
Am 27.12.2010 um 11:27 schrieb Minkyu Kang:
There is possibility that pointers set to NULL before relocation.
In this case, system is hang, because of r0 is invalid location in RAM.
Signed-off-by: Minkyu
Dear MrGates,
please always keep the mailing list on cc:
In message d9d3b66c8a5547e0ba21713b70c8e...@microsoft you wrote:
These indicate that in start.S,first instruction:b reset not jump success
What do you mean by that statement?
I am sorry that i have no clear.
I mean that b
Le 08/01/2011 11:49, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit :
In my investigations for 'NULL fixup' (- see
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/89864/focus=89906)
pointed out that only symbols in 'absolute fixup' loop could be 'NULL'
if there is a not aliased/empty weakly linked symbol.
On Saturday 08 January 2011 12:06 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Aneesh,
Pressed the Send button too fast last time. Missed answering the last
few questions.
snip..
+
+void invalidate_dcache_all(void)
+{
+v7_maint_dcache_all(ARMV7_DCACHE_INVAL_ALL);
+if (v7_outer_cache.inval_all)
+
Le 08/01/2011 14:17, Aneesh V a écrit :
Why use pointers here rather than weak functions?
In fact, I hadn't thought about it. Maybe I was biased by the Linux
implementation.The only reason I can think of is that pointer gives the
flexibility of doing this assignment at run-time. Let's say we
On 01/08/2011 02:04 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Le 07/01/2011 16:53, seedshope a écrit :
From: seedshopebocui...@gmail.com
Remove u-boot-nand.lds from board/samsung/smdk6400 and
use the common u-boot.lds of arm1176 cpu layer. This
patch also fix the building errors:
On 01/08/2011 02:14 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi seedshope,
Le 07/01/2011 16:53, seedshope a écrit :
From: seedshopebocui...@gmail.com
Modify u-boot.lds from nand_spl/board/samsung/smdk6400.
You're also modifying start.S. If you mention files in the patch
summary, then please mention them
On 01/08/2011 01:55 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Le 07/01/2011 16:53, seedshope a écrit :
From: seedshopebocui...@gmail.com
CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR point the last PHY of IRAM
and substract the global size.
Signed-off-by: seedshopebocui...@googlemail.com
Please fix the From: line in all
Dear seedshope,
On 8 January 2011 00:53, seedshope bocui...@gmail.com wrote:
From: seedshope bocui...@gmail.com
Modify u-boot.lds from nand_spl/board/samsung/smdk6400.
start.o: In function `clbss_l':
nand_spl/board/samsung/smdk6400/start.S:357: undefined reference to
`coloured_LED_init'
Le 08/01/2011 16:10, seedshope a écrit :
On 01/08/2011 01:55 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Le 07/01/2011 16:53, seedshope a écrit :
From: seedshopebocui...@gmail.com
CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR point the last PHY of IRAM
and substract the global size.
Signed-off-by:
Le 08/01/2011 11:49, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit :
In my investigations for 'NULL fixup' (- see
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/89864/focus=89906)
pointed out that only symbols in 'absolute fixup' loop could be 'NULL'
if there is a not aliased/empty weakly linked
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
Am 08.01.2011 um 13:18 schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
Le 08/01/2011 11:49, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit :
In my investigations for 'NULL fixup' (- see
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/89864/focus=89906)
pointed out that only symbols in 'absolute fixup' loop
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 1:33 AM, Aneesh V ane...@ti.com wrote:
John,
On Saturday 08 January 2011 12:16 PM, John Rigby wrote:
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Aneesh Vane...@ti.com wrote:
Hi John,
On Tuesday 28 December 2010 06:17 AM, John Rigby wrote:
Signed-off-by: John
This patch adds support for OpenCores tiny_spi.
http://opencores.org/project,tiny_spi
Signed-off-by: Thomas Chou tho...@wytron.com.tw
---
drivers/spi/Makefile |1 +
drivers/spi/oc_tiny_spi.c | 241 +
2 files changed, 242 insertions(+), 0
On 01/08/2011 11:15 PM, Minkyu Kang wrote:
Dear seedshope,
On 8 January 2011 00:53, seedshopebocui...@gmail.com wrote:
From: seedshopebocui...@gmail.com
Modify u-boot.lds from nand_spl/board/samsung/smdk6400.
start.o: In function `clbss_l':
nand_spl/board/samsung/smdk6400/start.S:357:
On 01/08/2011 11:17 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Le 08/01/2011 16:10, seedshope a écrit :
On 01/08/2011 01:55 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Le 07/01/2011 16:53, seedshope a écrit :
From: seedshopebocui...@gmail.com
CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR point the last PHY of IRAM
and substract the global size.
On Saturday, January 08, 2011 18:56:03 Thomas Chou wrote:
+ */
+#include common.h
space between comment and includes
+#include asm/gpio.h
+#define TINY_SPI_RXDATA 0
space between includes and defines
+static struct tiny_spi_host tiny_spi_host_list[] =
CONFIG_SYS_TINY_SPI_LIST;
i think
Hi
On 9 January 2011 10:14, seedshope bocui...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/08/2011 11:15 PM, Minkyu Kang wrote:
Dear seedshope,
On 8 January 2011 00:53, seedshopebocui...@gmail.com wrote:
From: seedshopebocui...@gmail.com
Modify u-boot.lds from nand_spl/board/samsung/smdk6400.
start.o: In
26 matches
Mail list logo
