Dear Albert Aribaud,
The following changes since commit 966a35d45b90fdcd694dec89b32e5b67771cfd64:
Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-arm (2011-02-16 08:54:52
+0900)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.denx.de/u-boot-samsung master
Chander Kashyap (2):
AR
Faraday ftwdt010 watchdog is an architecture independant
watchdog. It is usaually used in SoC chip design.
Signed-off-by: Macpaul Lin
---
Changes for v2:
- Fix the wrong title of ftwdt010_wdt patch.
Changes for v3:
- Patch v2 was encoded in utf-8. Fixed to ASCII.
Changes for v4:
- Replace t
Version v2010.09-rc2 ,i use git to fetch this version source code .
When i read README file in the top level directory ,i found LINE 131 is
something strange
129 U-Boot uses a 3 level version number containing a version, a
130 sub-version, and a patchlevel: "U-Boot-2.34.5" means version "2",
13
Version v2010.09-rc2 ,i use git to fetch this version source code .
When i read README file in the top level directory ,i found LINE 131 is
something strange
129 U-Boot uses a 3 level version number containing a version, a
130 sub-version, and a patchlevel: "U-Boot-2.34.5" means version "2",
13
Version v2010.09-rc2 ,i use git to fetch this version source code .
When i read README file in the top level directory ,i found LINE 131 is
something strange
129 U-Boot uses a 3 level version number containing a version, a
130 sub-version, and a patchlevel: "U-Boot-2.34.5" means version "2",
13
Hi Aaron,
On Thursday 24 March 2011 04:07:21 Aaron Williams wrote:
> I have it working on our 8-bit boards properly now, though I've only done
> some limited testing.
Good.
> I basically put in the correct addresses into cfi_flash.h and updated
> various addresses for 8-bit support. The problem
I have it working on our 8-bit boards properly now, though I've only done some
limited testing.
I basically put in the correct addresses into cfi_flash.h and updated various
addresses for 8-bit support. The problem was that the CFI code was written
using the 16-bit addresses which don't work fo
Dear David Müller,
On 22 March 2011 18:37, "David Müller (ELSOFT AG)" wrote:
> Minkyu Kang wrote:
>>> IMHO "Zero" should be correct with activated ARM reloc.
>>
>> Sorry but I can't understand.
>> Why?
>> Please let me know.
>
> Excerpt from doc/README.arm-relocation:
>
> maybe adapt CONFIG_SYS_T
Dear Chander Kashyap,
On 22 March 2011 20:40, Chander Kashyap wrote:
> Blocksize was hardcoded to 512 bytes. But the blocksize varies
> depeding on various mmc subsystem commands (between 8 and 512).
> This hardcoding was resulting in interrupt error during data
> transfer.
>
> It is now calculat
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 2:41 PM, asar wrote:
> I need to get/set current time and date in u-boot. How to do that? What
> driver support is required in order to do that?
grep DATE README
-mike
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx
Hi all,
I am preparing for a last pull request for ARM before the upcoming
release, since I have at least two fixes at the tip of my current master
branch which need pulling. I will send the pull request no later than
sunday (earlier if Wolfgang -- Cc:ed -- requires it before).
So, if there ar
Hi,
I need to get/set current time and date in u-boot. How to do that? What
driver support is required in order to do that?
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Hi all,
We are working on testing RNDIS gadget from u-boot on a davinci evm. I know
that we have patches for RNDIS module in the latest uboot. There is no musb
gadget controller that can be used with RNDIS module in the uboot source.
We would like to know if anybody is working on porting m
2011/3/23 Shinya Kuribayashi :
> On 03/21/2011 09:42 PM, Daniel Schwierzeck wrote:
>> I did some researching and testing with ELDK-4.1, ELDK-4.0 and ELDK-3.1.1.
>
> Thanks, much appreciated.
>
>> In ELDK-3.1.1 we have:
>> - mips_4KC-gcc (GCC) 3.3.3 (DENX ELDK 3.1.1 3.3.3-9)
>> - GNU assembler 2.14
On 03/21/2011 09:42 PM, Daniel Schwierzeck wrote:
> I did some researching and testing with ELDK-4.1, ELDK-4.0 and ELDK-3.1.1.
Thanks, much appreciated.
> In ELDK-3.1.1 we have:
> - mips_4KC-gcc (GCC) 3.3.3 (DENX ELDK 3.1.1 3.3.3-9)
> - GNU assembler 2.14 20030612
>
> Therefore mips32r2 is alrea
Hi Terry,
> So I guess:
> mmc_init calls mmc_send_op_cond that set high_capacity,
> than it calls mmc_startup, that, with MMC_CMD_SEND_CSD command, set
> the capacity, using values in CSD register.
> So I guess that mmc_change_freq should not recalculate high_capacity.
>
> It seems better, isn'
Dear =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?=,
In message you wrote:
> Holger Brunck writes:
>
> > Hi all,
> > I am wondering why arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/config.mk sets
> > -msoft-float for all ppc 83xx processors. This is valid e.g. for
> > MPC8321 but e.g. the MPC8360 has a hardware floating point
Holger Brunck writes:
> Hi all,
> I am wondering why arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/config.mk sets
> -msoft-float for all ppc 83xx processors. This is valid e.g. for
> MPC8321 but e.g. the MPC8360 has a hardware floating point
> unit. Shouldn't the config.mk file distinguish between different 83xx
> pr
Hi all,
I am wondering why arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/config.mk sets -msoft-float for all
ppc 83xx processors. This is valid e.g. for MPC8321 but e.g. the MPC8360 has a
hardware floating point unit. Shouldn't the config.mk file distinguish between
different 83xx processors to set this flag only for t
> -Original Message-
> From: Heiko Schocher [mailto:h...@denx.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 2:37 PM
> To: Lei Wen
> Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar; Lei Wen; Wolfgang Denk; u-boot@lists.denx.de;
> Marek Vasut; Ashish Karkare; Prabhanjan Sarnaik; Yu Tang
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/5] pxa: mo
> -Original Message-
> From: Heiko Schocher [mailto:h...@denx.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 2:23 PM
> To: Lei Wen
> Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar; Lei Wen; Wolfgang Denk; u-boot@lists.denx.de;
> Marek Vasut; Ashish Karkare; Prabhanjan Sarnaik; Yu Tang
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/5] pxa: mo
Hello Lei,
Lei Wen wrote:
> Hi Heiko,
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>> Hello Lei,
>>
>> Lei Wen wrote:
>>> Hi Heiko,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Hello Prafulla,
Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
>> -Original Message--
Hi Terry,
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 7:03 AM, Terry Lv wrote:
> MMC driver may wrongly regconize some 2GB eMMC as high capacity card.
>
> This patch is based on the patch picked from community.
>
> fc8a0985c2846292312556cba10b8a4182f55967
> From: Hanumath Prasad
> Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 18:01:45 -0
Hi Heiko,
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello Lei,
>
> Lei Wen wrote:
>> Hi Heiko,
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>>> Hello Prafulla,
>>>
>>> Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Lei Wen [mailto:adrian.w...
Hello Lei,
Lei Wen wrote:
> Hi Heiko,
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>> Hello Prafulla,
>>
>> Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Lei Wen [mailto:adrian.w...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 6:14 PM
To: Prafulla Wadask
Hi Wolfgang,
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:16 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Lei Wen,
>
> In message you
> wrote:
>>
> ...
>> >> - writel(readl(ICR) & ~ICR_ACKNA> K, ICR);
>> >> - writel(readl(ICR) & ~ICR_ALDIE, ICR);
>> >> - writel(readl(ICR) | ICR_TB,
Hi Heiko,
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello Prafulla,
>
> Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Lei Wen [mailto:adrian.w...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 6:14 PM
>>> To: Prafulla Wadaskar
>>> Cc: Lei Wen; Heiko Schocher; Wolf
Hello Prafulla,
Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Lei Wen [mailto:adrian.w...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 6:14 PM
>> To: Prafulla Wadaskar
>> Cc: Lei Wen; Heiko Schocher; Wolfgang Denk; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Marek
>> Vasut; Ashish Karkare; Prabhanjan S
> -Original Message-
> From: Lei Wen [mailto:adrian.w...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 6:14 PM
> To: Prafulla Wadaskar
> Cc: Lei Wen; Heiko Schocher; Wolfgang Denk; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Marek
> Vasut; Ashish Karkare; Prabhanjan Sarnaik; Yu Tang
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/5]
Congratulations, you are a winner of the Opec Oil Promotion send your name and
address for claims
-
Cyngor Sir Powys County Council
www.powys.gov.uk
Mae'r e bost hwn ac unrhyw atodiad iddo yn gyfrinachol ac fe'i
bwriedir ar gyfer y sawl a enwir arno yn uni
Hello John,
John Rigby wrote:
> From: Michael Brandt
>
> Signed-off-by: John Rigby
> ---
> drivers/i2c/Makefile|1 +
> drivers/i2c/u8500_i2c.c | 603
> +++
> drivers/i2c/u8500_i2c.h | 220 +
> 3 files changed, 824 insertion
31 matches
Mail list logo
