Hello,
I'm trying to port U-Boot to ARM&EVA board (with AT92RM9200 cpu). I'm a little
bit confused about usage of CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE macro. As mentioned many times
before U-Boot shouldn't be run from RAM, so I set CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE to point
a DataFlash memory. But when I do that not only .
Dear Marcin Górski,
Am 20.06.2011 10:36, schrieb Marcin Górski:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to port U-Boot to ARM&EVA board (with AT92RM9200 cpu). I'm a
> little bit confused about usage of CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE macro. As mentioned
> many times before U-Boot shouldn't be run from RAM, so I set
> CO
Hi,
I am using a PPC 440EP processor based custom designed board which is
based on AMCC's Yosemite as reference design.
I have ported u-boot-1.1.6 onto it. It is working fine but not able to
access external peripherals like NVRAM, ADC, DAC etc. in the board.
When try to read those addresses with
2011/6/18 Albert ARIBAUD :
> Hi,
>
> Le 17/06/2011 10:29, Alexei Ozhigov a écrit :
>>
>> 2011/6/17 Prafulla Wadaskar:
>>>
>>>
-Original Message-
From: Philip Hands [mailto:p...@hands.com]
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 1:33 AM
To: Alexei Ozhigov
Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar;
Dear Marcin Górski,
please no TOFU, use inline quoting (and send also to the list).
Am 20.06.2011 11:39, schrieb Marcin Górski:
> Hello,
>
> I already use CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT to prevent U-Boot from reinitilizing
> hardware. My board has 128MB RAM, so 0x2200 address is not a problem.
O
Hello Guys,
I am very new to u boot and want to know more in detail about u boot
including the software flow, drivers and adding a new board
configuration to u boot.
Please let me know how to start with this task and also provide me few
documents if available.
Thanks and Regards,
Yash.
___
Dear suresh kumar,
In message you wrote:
>
>I am using a PPC 440EP processor based custom designed board which is
> based on AMCC's Yosemite as reference design.
> I have ported u-boot-1.1.6 onto it. It is working fine but not able to
U-Boot 1.1.6 is more than 5 years old, i. e. it predates
Dear Yash Jain,
In message you wrote:
>
> I am very new to u boot and want to know more in detail about u boot
> including the software flow, drivers and adding a new board
> configuration to u boot.
> Please let me know how to start with this task and also provide me few
> documents if available
Hi Prafulla,
Le 20/06/2011 07:16, Prafulla Wadaskar a écrit :
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Albert ARIBAUD [mailto:albert.u.b...@aribaud.net]
>> Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 11:16 AM
>> To: Prafulla Wadaskar
>> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
>> Subject: Re: Pull request u-boot-marvell.git
>>
Hi Reinhard,
Le 20/06/2011 08:49, Reinhard Meyer a écrit :
> Dear Albert,
>
> The following changes since commit 0d8bc1c7b3caffd5626b6cf4888bfb5751f24041:
>Fabio Estevam (1):
> mx31pdk: Add DHCP command
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
>git://git.denx.de/u-boot-atmel.
On 06/20/2011 08:10 AM, helmut.rai...@hale.at wrote:
> From: Helmut Raiger
Hi Helmut,
>
> The driver already had the MII functions, but they have not been
> registered using miiphy_register().
>
> Signed-off-by: Helmut Raiger
Not noted before, thanks for fixing it. Only to remark the issue,
Hi everyone,
Has someone played with interrupts on the mini2440?
I am new to uboot and embedded development and some pointers would be much
appreciated.
Regards,
Martin
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Mini2440-Interrupt-support-tp31885150p31885150.html
Sent from the Uboo
Hello,
Make as much as US$5,000.00/month..!!! Are you based in the United States or
Canada? Are you a home owner? Do you have the Honesty,Positive,Attitude and
Integrity to operate a legitimate business that guarantees you a cycle of up to
US$5,000.00/month with no money required? This is your
Hi Ben,
I had no hardware for a about a week but now I have an AM1808 experimenter's
kit again and can continue investigating this issue.
On this board, older versions of u-boot (like v2009.11) boot perfectly,
even when TI's UBL boot loader is not used (instead the configuration of
DDR memory
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message <4dff3389.30...@aribaud.net> you wrote:
>
> >git://git.denx.de/u-boot-atmel.git master
...
> Applied, thanks!
Thanks. Can you please send an ARM pull req ASAP, too, so we can get
-rc3 out?
Thanks a lot in advance.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Soft
Dear Christian Riesch,
In message <1308575272-30559-1-git-send-email-christian.rie...@omicron.at> you
wrote:
>
> On this board, older versions of u-boot (like v2009.11) boot perfectly,
> even when TI's UBL boot loader is not used (instead the configuration of
> DDR memory was done using an AIS
Dear Wolfgang Denk:
> Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
>
> In message <4dff3389.30...@aribaud.net> you wrote:
>>
>>>git://git.denx.de/u-boot-atmel.git master
> ...
>> Applied, thanks!
>
> Thanks. Can you please send an ARM pull req ASAP, too, so we can get
> -rc3 out?
>
> Thanks a lot in advance.
Just
In one of my devices, uboot-environment is located at a bad block.
"save
Saving Environment to NAND...
Erasing Nand...
Skipping bad block at 0x000c
Writing to Nand... FAILED!"
In my memory mapping I have already reseverd 2blocks.
How can I setup uboot in a way, that it will look at c or
Changelog:
V2:
unfiy original mmc read and write command together to only place
Based on the unfied result, also add the erase command into that place.
Lei Wen (2):
MMC: unify mmc read and write operation
MMC: add erase function to both mmc and sd
common/cmd_mmc.c | 84 +++
mmc read and write command has so many in common, unfiy those two to
force consistency across the those two.
Signed-off-by: Lei Wen
---
Changelog:
V2:
unfiy original mmc read and write command together to only place
common/cmd_mmc.c | 67 +++--
Erase is a very basic function since the begin of sd specification is
announced. Although we could write a bulk of full 0xff memory to the
range to take place of erase, it is more convenient and safe to
implement the erase function itself.
Signed-off-by: Lei Wen
---
Changelog:
V2:
Based on the un
Hi Prafulla,
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Lei Wen [mailto:lei...@marvell.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 8:48 PM
>> To: Andy Fleming; Rob Herring; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Prafulla Wadaskar;
>> Yu Tang; Prabhanjan Sarnaik;
Hello Wolfgang,
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Christian Riesch,
>
> In message <1308575272-30559-1-git-send-email-christian.rie...@omicron.at>
> you wrote:
>>
>> On this board, older versions of u-boot (like v2009.11) boot perfectly,
>> even when TI's UBL boot load
Dear Arno Steffen,
In message you wrote:
> In one of my devices, uboot-environment is located at a bad block.
> "save
> Saving Environment to NAND...
> Erasing Nand...
> Skipping bad block at 0x000c
Why are you reposting the same message just 8 hours after the initial
posting?
Don't do tha
Dear Christian Riesch,
In message you wrote:
>
> > What is AIS ?
>
> I apologize for using that many abbreviations in my mail and not
> explaining them :-/
>
> AIS is short for Application Image Script [1]. It is a boot script
> that is processed by the ROM bootloader on Texas Instrument's
> AM
On 06/20/2011 02:30 PM, Stefano Babic wrote:
>
> Not noted before, thanks for fixing it. Only to remark the issue, on
> boards with SMC911x (at least the one I tested your patch) and
> CONFIG_CMD_MII set, a simple "mii info" returns "Read MDIO failed.."
>
Our board holds a SMSC LAN9211-ABZJ , 'mii
Hello,
I can't find this patch applied in the U-boot sources (or any of the
forks). Is this functionality going to be merged into U-Boot ?
Did I miss something ? Any answer would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
B.R.
Vilo
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot
I am very sorry, apologize me! My fault.
I haven't seen my mail in the mailing archive, so I thought it was
just saved as draft or forget to write [uboot] in subject.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boo
Dear Arno Steffen,
In message you wrote:
> I am very sorry, apologize me! My fault.
> I haven't seen my mail in the mailing archive, so I thought it was
> just saved as draft or forget to write [uboot] in subject.
Where did you look?
DENX: http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2011-June/09464
Dear Skacore Systems,
In message you wrote:
>
> I can't find this patch applied in the U-boot sources (or any of the
> forks). Is this functionality going to be merged into U-Boot ?
> Did I miss something ? Any answer would be greatly appreciated.
v8 of these patches has been posted only 7 days
Hi all,
I am trying to activate a PCIe link between two MPC8544 processor's on a
custom board.
One processor is configured as Root Complex (cfg_host_agt[0:2] = '111') and
the other processor as endpoint (cfg_host_agt[0:2] = '101').
Only PCIe1 is active in both processors (cfg_IO_ports[0:2] = '010')
Dear Sughosh,
> I guess this is the same as nand_spl. Do you use nand_boot.c in the
> spl code. This file has the nand_chip object declared as a local
> variable on the stack, and not bss.
I first tried to use the standard NAND implementation - but I think
you are right - using nand_spl impleme
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 15:52:29 +0530
"V, Aneesh" wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 3:58 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:18:57 +0530
> > Aneesh V wrote:
> >
> >> @@ -1158,6 +1164,7 @@ clobber: clean
> >> @[ ! -d $(obj)nand_spl ] || find $(obj)nand_spl -name "*" -type l
Hi Wolfgang,
Le 20/06/2011 15:44, Wolfgang Denk a écrit :
> Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
>
> In message<4dff3389.30...@aribaud.net> you wrote:
>>
>>> git://git.denx.de/u-boot-atmel.git master
> ...
>> Applied, thanks!
>
> Thanks. Can you please send an ARM pull req ASAP, too, so we can get
> -rc3 ou
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 15:49:36 +0200
Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> 2) terse vs verbose.
>
> I like terse more, and yes, I concur with Wolfgang that as far as output
> verbosity is concerned, this should be done natively in make, not in
> makefiles -- but it might be easier said than done, because the
Hi,
2011/6/14 Simon Glass :
> Built-in Ethernet adapters support setting the mac address by means of a
> ethaddr environment variable for each interface (ethaddr, eth1addr, eth2addr).
>
> This adds similar support to the USB network side, using the names
> usbethaddr, usbeth1addr, etc. They are ke
Hi,
2011/6/14 Simon Glass :
> The SMSC95XX is a USB hub with a built-in Ethernet adapter. This adds support
> for this, using the USB host network framework.
>
> Changes for v2:
> - Coding style cleanup
> - Changed some comments as suggested
>
> Changes for v3:
> - Change turbo_mode to #define
>
>
Hi,
2011/6/14 Simon Glass :
> This describes what it is for, devices supported, how to enable for your
> board in U-Boot, setting up the server, and notes about MAC addresses.
>
> Changes for v6:
> - Adjust documentation file according to Wolfgang's comments
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
> Teste
Hi,
2011/6/14 Simon Glass :
> This is a small clean-up patch.
>
> Changes for v8:
> - Fix typo in auto_load
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
> Tested-by: Eric Bénard
> ---
Applied to u-boot-usb AFTER cleaning up commit message (Change history
of the patch should be below the '---' line)
Kind r
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 15:03:09 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> considering LDSCRIPT/CONFIG_SYS_LDSCRIPT only get used by the top level
> u-boot
> file, and only when the system is configured, i wonder if we shouldnt just
> rip
> it out of config.mk and into the top level Makefile.
>
> let's see
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message <4dff737a.4040...@aribaud.net> you wrote:
>
> I can do a pull request now, but if I did and if Prafulla actually
> wanted the marvell next branch to be pulled in ARM master for inclusion
> in 2011-06, I'll then have to issue yet another pull req after rc3.
> Wou
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 18:03, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> I think it is fundamentally wrong to implement such a feature (let's
> call it "terse make output") in the Makefiles of many projects, using
> a lot of trickery and magic. If a specific verbosity of make output
> is needed, this should most na
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 18:03, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> I think it is fundamentally wrong to implement such a feature (let's
>> call it "terse make output") in the Makefiles of many projects, using
>> a lot of trickery and magic. If a spec
Hi Wolfgang,
Le 20/06/2011 21:43, Wolfgang Denk a écrit :
> Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
>
> In message<4dff737a.4040...@aribaud.net> you wrote:
>>
>> I can do a pull request now, but if I did and if Prafulla actually
>> wanted the marvell next branch to be pulled in ARM master for inclusion
>> in 2011-0
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message <4dffb961.7070...@aribaud.net> you wrote:
>
> > No. I understand MV next branch is not intended to go into this
> > release. When -rc3 is out, we may create a next branch, where this
> > can be pulled into.
>
> Wolfgang: I am not as convinced as you are about the M
Dear Simon Glass,
In message
you wrote:
>
> >> So yes, patches are welcome, but these should go directly to the make
> >> mailing lists / patch system, see
> >> http://savannah.gnu.org/mail/?group=make
> >
> > not to kick sand just for fun, but this is an example of you getting
> > final veto po
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message you wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 18:03, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > I think it is fundamentally wrong to implement such a feature (let's
> > call it "terse make output") in the Makefiles of many projects, using
> > a lot of trickery and magic. =A0If a specific ve
From: Mike Frysinger
Dependencies for the envcrc objects should be generated only in the case
we are going to build envcrc itself. Otherwise it's a waste of work and
can lead to the (harmless but annoying) errors during dependency
generation.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Yanok
---
tools/Makefile | 24
LDSCRIPT is used only from the top-level Makefile and only when the
system is configured so we can move LDSCRIPT and CONFIG_SYS_LDSCRIPT
related logic into the top level Makefile and under configured condition
to avoid errors when building tools from unconfigured tree.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Yanok
-
mkimage relies on autogenerated version so we need to move
$(VERSION_FILE) rule out of ifeq and make tools rule depend on it to be
able to run 'make tools' from the unconfigured tree.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Yanok
---
Makefile | 36 ++--
1 files changed, 18 insertio
Dear Wolfgang,
I've prepared a new series of patches that I believe adresses most of
your comments, but I have a few responses and a question before sending
the new patch series out.
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 09:45:22PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Add pxecfg command, which is intended to mimic
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Simon Glass,
>
> In message
> you
> wrote:
>>
>> >> So yes, patches are welcome, but these should go directly to the make
>> >> mailing lists / patch system, see
>> >> http://savannah.gnu.org/mail/?group=make
>> >
>> > not to kick san
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
On Monday, June 20, 2011 16:30:15 Simon Glass wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > indeed. it shouldnt be that bad now that more stuff has converted to
> > FOO-$(CONFIG) syntax. it could probably even be done piece by piece
> > rather than the whole tree to make tr
On Monday 20 June 2011 09:49 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 15:52:29 +0530
> "V, Aneesh" wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 3:58 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
>>> On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:18:57 +0530
>>> Aneesh V wrote:
>>>
@@ -1158,6 +1164,7 @@ clobber:clean
@[ ! -d
http://tjtintas.com.br/google.php___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Hello Wolfgang,
On Monday, June 20, 2011, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> You might want to synchronize your efforts with Heiko Schocher (on
> cc:) who might be working on similar things.
Thanks! I put Heiko on cc in my first email in this thread, but then
forgot it later. Sorry about that, Heiko, I am l
Dear Wolfgang,
On Sunday 15 May 2011 08:51 PM, Aneesh V wrote:
[snip ..]
> +static const u32 clk_modules_hw_auto_essential[] = {
> + CM_WKUP_GPIO1_CLKCTRL,
> + CM_L4PER_GPIO2_CLKCTRL,
> + CM_L4PER_GPIO3_CLKCTRL,
> + CM_L4PER_GPIO4_CLKCTRL,
> + CM_L4PER_GPIO5_CLKCTRL,
> + CM
Dear Wolfgang,
On Tuesday 21 June 2011 11:19 AM, Aneesh V wrote:
> Dear Wolfgang,
>
> On Sunday 15 May 2011 08:51 PM, Aneesh V wrote:
> [snip ..]
>> +static const u32 clk_modules_hw_auto_essential[] = {
>> + CM_WKUP_GPIO1_CLKCTRL,
>> + CM_L4PER_GPIO2_CLKCTRL,
>> + CM_L4PER_GPIO3_CLKCTRL,
>> + CM_L
61 matches
Mail list logo
