Dear Albert,
The following changes since commit 0d8bc1c7b3caffd5626b6cf4888bfb5751f24041:
Fabio Estevam (1):
mx31pdk: Add DHCP command
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.denx.de/u-boot-atmel.git master
Eric Benard (4):
arm926ejs/at91/lowlevel_init.S: fix
Dear Marcin Górski,
Am 20.06.2011 10:36, schrieb Marcin Górski:
Hello,
I'm trying to port U-Boot to ARMEVA board (with AT92RM9200 cpu). I'm a
little bit confused about usage of CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE macro. As mentioned
many times before U-Boot shouldn't be run from RAM, so I set
Hi,
I am using a PPC 440EP processor based custom designed board which is
based on AMCC's Yosemite as reference design.
I have ported u-boot-1.1.6 onto it. It is working fine but not able to
access external peripherals like NVRAM, ADC, DAC etc. in the board.
When try to read those addresses
2011/6/18 Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.b...@aribaud.net:
Hi,
Le 17/06/2011 10:29, Alexei Ozhigov a écrit :
2011/6/17 Prafulla Wadaskarprafu...@marvell.com:
-Original Message-
From: Philip Hands [mailto:p...@hands.com]
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 1:33 AM
To: Alexei Ozhigov
Cc:
Dear Marcin Górski,
please no TOFU, use inline quoting (and send also to the list).
Am 20.06.2011 11:39, schrieb Marcin Górski:
Hello,
I already use CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT to prevent U-Boot from reinitilizing
hardware. My board has 128MB RAM, so 0x2200 address is not a problem.
Ok
Hello Guys,
I am very new to u boot and want to know more in detail about u boot
including the software flow, drivers and adding a new board
configuration to u boot.
Please let me know how to start with this task and also provide me few
documents if available.
Thanks and Regards,
Yash.
Dear suresh kumar,
In message BANLkTik0R4ho5d_9XK3iG1ywgJZB=qy...@mail.gmail.com you wrote:
I am using a PPC 440EP processor based custom designed board which is
based on AMCC's Yosemite as reference design.
I have ported u-boot-1.1.6 onto it. It is working fine but not able to
U-Boot
Dear Yash Jain,
In message BANLkTikSK11q6=t5eqxtlrjvirjxv42...@mail.gmail.com you wrote:
I am very new to u boot and want to know more in detail about u boot
including the software flow, drivers and adding a new board
configuration to u boot.
Please let me know how to start with this task
Hi Prafulla,
Le 20/06/2011 07:16, Prafulla Wadaskar a écrit :
-Original Message-
From: Albert ARIBAUD [mailto:albert.u.b...@aribaud.net]
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 11:16 AM
To: Prafulla Wadaskar
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: Pull request u-boot-marvell.git
(resent as
Hi Reinhard,
Le 20/06/2011 08:49, Reinhard Meyer a écrit :
Dear Albert,
The following changes since commit 0d8bc1c7b3caffd5626b6cf4888bfb5751f24041:
Fabio Estevam (1):
mx31pdk: Add DHCP command
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.denx.de/u-boot-atmel.git
On 06/20/2011 08:10 AM, helmut.rai...@hale.at wrote:
From: Helmut Raiger helmut.rai...@hale.at
Hi Helmut,
The driver already had the MII functions, but they have not been
registered using miiphy_register().
Signed-off-by: Helmut Raiger helmut.rai...@hale.at
Not noted before, thanks for
In one of my devices, uboot-environment is located at a bad block.
save
Saving Environment to NAND...
Erasing Nand...
Skipping bad block at 0x000c
Writing to Nand... FAILED!
In my memory mapping I have already reseverd 2blocks.
How can I setup uboot in a way, that it will look at c or
Dear Christian Riesch,
In message banlktimhjss_urkzb-q5y7gqzawswe0...@mail.gmail.com you wrote:
What is AIS ?
I apologize for using that many abbreviations in my mail and not
explaining them :-/
AIS is short for Application Image Script [1]. It is a boot script
that is processed by the
Dear Skacore Systems,
In message BANLkTimcxaEJp3wwdbaeuA5acE=datv...@mail.gmail.com you wrote:
I can't find this patch applied in the U-boot sources (or any of the
forks). Is this functionality going to be merged into U-Boot ?
Did I miss something ? Any answer would be greatly appreciated.
Hi all,
I am trying to activate a PCIe link between two MPC8544 processor's on a
custom board.
One processor is configured as Root Complex (cfg_host_agt[0:2] = '111') and
the other processor as endpoint (cfg_host_agt[0:2] = '101').
Only PCIe1 is active in both processors (cfg_IO_ports[0:2] =
Dear Sughosh,
I guess this is the same as nand_spl. Do you use nand_boot.c in the
spl code. This file has the nand_chip object declared as a local
variable on the stack, and not bss.
I first tried to use the standard NAND implementation - but I think
you are right - using nand_spl
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 15:52:29 +0530
V, Aneesh ane...@ti.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 3:58 AM, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:18:57 +0530
Aneesh V ane...@ti.com wrote:
@@ -1158,6 +1164,7 @@ clobber: clean
@[ ! -d $(obj)nand_spl ] ||
Hi Wolfgang,
Le 20/06/2011 15:44, Wolfgang Denk a écrit :
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message4dff3389.30...@aribaud.net you wrote:
git://git.denx.de/u-boot-atmel.git master
...
Applied, thanks!
Thanks. Can you please send an ARM pull req ASAP, too, so we can get
-rc3 out?
I can do a
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 15:49:36 +0200
Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.b...@aribaud.net wrote:
2) terse vs verbose.
I like terse more, and yes, I concur with Wolfgang that as far as output
verbosity is concerned, this should be done natively in make, not in
makefiles -- but it might be easier said
Hi,
2011/6/14 Simon Glass s...@chromium.org:
Built-in Ethernet adapters support setting the mac address by means of a
ethaddr environment variable for each interface (ethaddr, eth1addr, eth2addr).
This adds similar support to the USB network side, using the names
usbethaddr, usbeth1addr,
Hi,
2011/6/14 Simon Glass s...@chromium.org:
The SMSC95XX is a USB hub with a built-in Ethernet adapter. This adds support
for this, using the USB host network framework.
Changes for v2:
- Coding style cleanup
- Changed some comments as suggested
Changes for v3:
- Change turbo_mode to
Hi,
2011/6/14 Simon Glass s...@chromium.org:
This describes what it is for, devices supported, how to enable for your
board in U-Boot, setting up the server, and notes about MAC addresses.
Changes for v6:
- Adjust documentation file according to Wolfgang's comments
Signed-off-by: Simon
Hi,
2011/6/14 Simon Glass s...@chromium.org:
This is a small clean-up patch.
Changes for v8:
- Fix typo in auto_load
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass s...@chromium.org
Tested-by: Eric Bénard e...@eukrea.com
---
Applied to u-boot-usb AFTER cleaning up commit message (Change history
of the
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 15:03:09 -0400
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
considering LDSCRIPT/CONFIG_SYS_LDSCRIPT only get used by the top level
u-boot
file, and only when the system is configured, i wonder if we shouldnt just
rip
it out of config.mk and into the top level Makefile.
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message 4dff737a.4040...@aribaud.net you wrote:
I can do a pull request now, but if I did and if Prafulla actually
wanted the marvell next branch to be pulled in ARM master for inclusion
in 2011-06, I'll then have to issue yet another pull req after rc3.
Would
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 18:03, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
I think it is fundamentally wrong to implement such a feature (let's
call it terse make output) in the Makefiles of many projects, using
a lot of trickery and magic. If a specific verbosity of make output
is needed, this should
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 18:03, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
I think it is fundamentally wrong to implement such a feature (let's
call it terse make output) in the Makefiles of many projects, using
a lot of trickery
Hi Wolfgang,
Le 20/06/2011 21:43, Wolfgang Denk a écrit :
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message4dff737a.4040...@aribaud.net you wrote:
I can do a pull request now, but if I did and if Prafulla actually
wanted the marvell next branch to be pulled in ARM master for inclusion
in 2011-06, I'll then
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message 4dffb961.7070...@aribaud.net you wrote:
No. I understand MV next branch is not intended to go into this
release. When -rc3 is out, we may create a next branch, where this
can be pulled into.
Wolfgang: I am not as convinced as you are about the MV next
Dear Simon Glass,
In message BANLkTi=SJseedJ=vcwr2i+kasc8a_4eqatf69+y5skoqh2f...@mail.gmail.com
you wrote:
So yes, patches are welcome, but these should go directly to the make
mailing lists / patch system, see
http://savannah.gnu.org/mail/?group=make
not to kick sand just for fun,
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message BANLkTim5nXA8fF=o24ghegl+xybtqlm...@mail.gmail.com you wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 18:03, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
I think it is fundamentally wrong to implement such a feature (let's
call it terse make output) in the Makefiles of many projects,
From: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
Dependencies for the envcrc objects should be generated only in the case
we are going to build envcrc itself. Otherwise it's a waste of work and
can lead to the (harmless but annoying) errors during dependency
generation.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Yanok
LDSCRIPT is used only from the top-level Makefile and only when the
system is configured so we can move LDSCRIPT and CONFIG_SYS_LDSCRIPT
related logic into the top level Makefile and under configured condition
to avoid errors when building tools from unconfigured tree.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Yanok
mkimage relies on autogenerated version so we need to move
$(VERSION_FILE) rule out of ifeq and make tools rule depend on it to be
able to run 'make tools' from the unconfigured tree.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Yanok ya...@emcraft.com
---
Makefile | 36 ++--
1 files
Dear Wolfgang,
I've prepared a new series of patches that I believe adresses most of
your comments, but I have a few responses and a question before sending
the new patch series out.
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 09:45:22PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Add pxecfg command, which is intended to mimic
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Simon Glass,
In message
BANLkTi=SJseedJ=vcwr2i+kasc8a_4eqatf69+y5skoqh2f...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
So yes, patches are welcome, but these should go directly to the make
mailing lists / patch system, see
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
On Monday, June 20, 2011 16:30:15 Simon Glass wrote:
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
indeed. it shouldnt be that bad now that more stuff has converted to
FOO-$(CONFIG) syntax. it could probably even be done piece by piece
rather than the whole tree to make
On Monday 20 June 2011 09:49 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 15:52:29 +0530
V, Aneeshane...@ti.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 3:58 AM, Scott Woodscottw...@freescale.com wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:18:57 +0530
Aneesh Vane...@ti.com wrote:
@@ -1158,6 +1164,7 @@ clobber:
http://tjtintas.com.br/google.php___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Hello Wolfgang,
On Monday, June 20, 2011, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
You might want to synchronize your efforts with Heiko Schocher (on
cc:) who might be working on similar things.
Thanks! I put Heiko on cc in my first email in this thread, but then
forgot it later. Sorry about that,
Dear Wolfgang,
On Sunday 15 May 2011 08:51 PM, Aneesh V wrote:
[snip ..]
+static const u32 clk_modules_hw_auto_essential[] = {
+ CM_WKUP_GPIO1_CLKCTRL,
+ CM_L4PER_GPIO2_CLKCTRL,
+ CM_L4PER_GPIO3_CLKCTRL,
+ CM_L4PER_GPIO4_CLKCTRL,
+ CM_L4PER_GPIO5_CLKCTRL,
+
44 matches
Mail list logo
