Hi Aneesh,
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 08:05:42PM +0530, Aneesh V wrote:
c2dd0d45540397704de9b13287417d21049d34c6 added dcache_enable()
to board_init_r(). This enables d-cache for all ARM boards.
As a result some of the arm boards that are not cache-ready
are broken. Revert this change and allow
Le 14/08/2011 05:10, shawn Bai a écrit :
Hi Shawn,
Le 13/08/2011 17:33, shawn Bai a écrit :
Hello, guys.
I have 2 questions about duart on MPC837xE-rdb board.
1. why not implement duart driver in interrupt-driven mode, in addition
to polling-mode?
Le 14/08/2011 16:25, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit :
This is *even worse* than using a standalone application, because a)
you're heavily modifying U-Boot in a way that it was not designed for,
whereas you could do it with a standalone app, which is the documented
way of doing that kind of thing in
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Dear Reinhard,
finally I found the relocation problem.
Make sure that at91bootstrap loads the full u-boot image (u-boot
became larger quite a bit due to relocation and other changes).
That was the solution!
I left the old at91bootstrap from in-circuit on the board. This one only
copies 256k
On Wednesday, August 03, 2011 08:37:00 Valentin Longchamp wrote:
--- a/include/post.h
+++ b/include/post.h
+/*
+ * some ARM implementations have to use gd-ram_size, since POST_WORD is
+ * defined in RAM
+ */
+DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
i'm not sure about this. no other header has been
Lot of commands in u-boot have repeat command flag but not all are
very usefull. Remove this flag for tftp to avoid repeated file download
when user press enter.
Signed-off-by: Marek Belisko marek.beli...@open-nandra.com
---
common/cmd_net.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1
On Wednesday, August 03, 2011 08:37:05 Valentin Longchamp wrote:
This patch adds a board support for km_arm in the POST framework.
It consists of a memory test configuration with the redefinition of
the arch_memory_test_prepare function.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Longchamp
From: James Le Cuirot ch...@aura-online.co.uk
The Winbond W25X40 is now being used in the IP02 (and possibly IP04)
boards. Tested and working on the actual device.
Signed-off-by: James Le Cuirot ch...@aura-online.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
---
On Friday, July 29, 2011 14:40:23 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 07:23, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
What we should be using (and standardizing for) is probably this (at
least some of the PTBs said so in the past):
(*) ioreadX(), iowriteX()
that's fine by me
Sorry,
l am a Staff of Hang Seng Bank HongKong, I do not know if we can work
together in transferring $19,500,000.USD from my bank to you account.
Finally if you are interested I shall provide you with more details.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
On Friday, July 29, 2011 04:57:53 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
For people who want to manually extract the embedded environment so that
it can be manually packed into the final u-boot image, add a config opt
to force building of the envcrc tool.
README
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Chunhe Lan chunhe@freescale.com wrote:
+/*
+ * Sets the specified node's status to the value contained in status.
+ * If the first character of the specified path is / then we use
+ * alias as a path. Otherwise, we look for an alias of that name.
+ */
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 16:25:35 +0200
From: albert.u.b...@aribaud.net
To: programas...@hotmail.com
CC: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Question about interrupt-driven mode duart on
MPC837xE-rdb board.(with the subject)
Le 14/08/2011
Hello, guys,
I find there is an error in definition of structure gtm83xx_t in immap_83xx.h .
But I am not sure, maybe there is what I don't realize.
At this moment, in the uboot source code, it is defined as follows:
typedef struct gtm83xx { u8 cfr1; u8 res0[3]; u8 cfr2; u8 res1[10]; ...}
In
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 08:08:04 +0800, Tabi Timur-B04825
b04...@freescale.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Chunhe Lan chunhe@freescale.com
wrote:
+/*
+ * Sets the specified node's status to the value contained in status.
+ * If the first character of the specified path is /
On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 00:24:33 +0800, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com
wrote:
On 08/11/2011 10:18 PM, Chunhe Lan wrote:
Add a fdt_set_node_status function that will set the specified
node's status to the value contained in status. If the node
doesn't have status property that will be
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 02:20:18 +
shawn Bai programas...@hotmail.com wrote:
In my opinion,the third member in struct gtm83xx if numbered from zero should
be defined as u8 res1[11] not u8 res1[10].
There shoudl be one more u8 space reserved according to the mpc837x reference
manual.
yep.
19 matches
Mail list logo
