Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mx1: add mx1/l support for mxc_i2c

2011-09-18 Thread Marek Vasut
On Monday, August 22, 2011 10:56:43 PM Eric Jarrige wrote: > Signed-off-by: Eric Jarrige > Cc: Stefano Babic > Cc: Heiko Schocher > --- > drivers/i2c/mxc_i2c.c |6 ++ > 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/mxc_i2c.c b/drivers/i2c/mxc_i2c.c > ind

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] punt unused clean/distclean targets

2011-09-18 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Mike Frysinger, In message <201109190130.51611.vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote: > > i think the next itch i'll scratch is unifying board/*/Makefile into like > board/board.mk ... then it'll be a lot easier to migrate these further. This needs discussion. As mentioned before, I feat this will

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] punt unused clean/distclean targets

2011-09-18 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Mike Frysinger, In message <201109190059.55664.vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote: > > if it wasn't clear in my last e-mail, i want to move in the direction of .mk > files that the top level would include them and thus all the specific cruft > would be kept there Why should we do that? Having a

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mx1: add mx1/l support for mxc_i2c

2011-09-18 Thread Heiko Schocher
Hello Stefano, Eric Jarrige wrote: > Signed-off-by: Eric Jarrige > Cc: Stefano Babic > Cc: Heiko Schocher > --- > drivers/i2c/mxc_i2c.c |6 ++ > 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) from my side of view, this patch is Ok, could you Ack it, or do you want to pick it up, so

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] [ARM] Status for last 13 unclean-building ARM boards

2011-09-18 Thread Stefan Roese
Hi Albert, On Saturday 17 September 2011 10:12:02 Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > 2. ixdp425 is marked "orphaned". Stefan, I am wild-guessing that ixdp425 > might be acquainted to the ixdpg425 that you maintain. Do you want to > take ixdp425? If not, we should drop it. I don't have access to it. I vote f

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/8] I2C: added I2C-2 and I2C-3 to MX35

2011-09-18 Thread Heiko Schocher
Hello Stefano, Stefano Babic wrote: > Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic > CC: Heiko Schocher > --- > drivers/i2c/mxc_i2c.c |4 > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) Acked-by: Heiko Schocher bye, Heiko -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4 V2] I2C: mxc_i2c rework

2011-09-18 Thread Heiko Schocher
Hello Marek, Marek Vasut wrote: > Rewrite the mxc_i2c driver. > * This version is much closer to Linux implementation. > * Fixes IPG_PERCLK being incorrectly used as clock source > * Fixes behaviour of the driver on iMX51 > * Clean up coding style a bit ;-) > > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut > -

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 8/8] arm, davinci: add support for am1808 based enbw_cmc board

2011-09-18 Thread Heiko Schocher
- booting from NOR Flash with direct boot method - POST support - LOGBUF support Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher Cc: Paulraj Sandeep Cc: Albert ARIBAUD Cc: Igor Grinberg --- - changes for v2 - use CONFIG_MACH_TYPE instead setting the MACH_TYPE in board specific code, as Igor Grinberg sugge

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] net, davinci_emac: add KSZ8864 switch

2011-09-18 Thread Heiko Schocher
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher Cc: Paulraj Sandeep Cc: Albert ARIBAUD Cc: Mike Frysinger --- - changes for v2: - add comment from Mike Frysinger remove check if CONFIG_DRIVER_TI_EMAC and CONFIG_CMD_NET are defined. arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/Makefile |2 +- arch/arm/cpu

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] punt unused clean/distclean targets

2011-09-18 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday, September 19, 2011 01:11:17 Graeme Russ wrote: > Hi Mike > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Sunday, September 18, 2011 09:08:35 Graeme Russ wrote: > >> On 18/09/11 18:22, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> > On Sunday, September 18, 2011 03:26:38 Wolfgang Denk wr

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] punt unused clean/distclean targets

2011-09-18 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday, September 19, 2011 01:10:57 Marek Vasut wrote: > On Monday, September 19, 2011 06:59:52 AM Mike Frysinger wrote: > > after all, the list of things to clean should be obvious once we have > > more kbuild style system: if it's listed as a file to build, then it > > should get cleaned. > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] punt unused clean/distclean targets

2011-09-18 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi Mike On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Sunday, September 18, 2011 09:08:35 Graeme Russ wrote: >> On 18/09/11 18:22, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> > On Sunday, September 18, 2011 03:26:38 Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> >> Mike Frysinger wrote: >> >>> The top level Makefile does no

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] punt unused clean/distclean targets

2011-09-18 Thread Marek Vasut
On Monday, September 19, 2011 06:59:52 AM Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Sunday, September 18, 2011 09:08:35 Graeme Russ wrote: > > On 18/09/11 18:22, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > On Sunday, September 18, 2011 03:26:38 Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > >> Mike Frysinger wrote: > > >>> The top level Makefile does

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] punt unused clean/distclean targets

2011-09-18 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday, September 18, 2011 09:08:35 Graeme Russ wrote: > On 18/09/11 18:22, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Sunday, September 18, 2011 03:26:38 Wolfgang Denk wrote: > >> Mike Frysinger wrote: > >>> The top level Makefile does not do any recursion into subdirs when > >>> cleaning, so these clean/dis

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] devkit8000: Fix build break

2011-09-18 Thread Tom Rini
On Sunday, September 18, 2011, Paulraj, Sandeep wrote: >> > I believe this only exists with the SPL patches merged which I thought >> > was only in your next branch atm... >> >> Confirm, from current u-boot-arm/master: >> >> uboot@lilith:~/src/u-boot-arm$ ./MAKEALL devkit8000 >> Configuring for de

[U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-ti/next

2011-09-18 Thread s-paulraj
Please pull u-boot-ti/next. I checked all the patches for checkpatch errors. Also all OMAP3 and OMAP4 built with no issues. Thanks, Sandeep The following changes since commit 3522ad62864669b335b85f5abcd136a84bbb7519: Ajay Bhargav (1): Armada100: Enable 88E3015 PHY support for GplugD ar

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] devkit8000: Fix build break

2011-09-18 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
> > I believe this only exists with the SPL patches merged which I thought > > was only in your next branch atm... > > Confirm, from current u-boot-arm/master: > > uboot@lilith:~/src/u-boot-arm$ ./MAKEALL devkit8000 > Configuring for devkit8000 board... > textdata bss dec hex

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v7] dreamplug: initial board support.

2011-09-18 Thread Jason
Wolfgang, On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 10:28:47PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message <20110918183913.ga32...@titan.lakedaemon.net> you wrote: > > As for my original question, since this patch series has had several > > versions on the mailinglist [1] prior to the close of the merge window, > > is

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v7] dreamplug: initial board support.

2011-09-18 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Jason, In message <20110918183913.ga32...@titan.lakedaemon.net> you wrote: > > As for my original question, since this patch series has had several > versions on the mailinglist [1] prior to the close of the merge window, > is it still possible to get it in for 2011.09? I cannot promise thi

[U-Boot] [PATCH v8] dreamplug: initial board support.

2011-09-18 Thread Jason Cooper
Copied wholeheartedly from board/Marvell/guruplug and modified to add support for SPI NOR flash. CONFIG_MACH_DREAMPLUG defined in include/configs/dreamplug.h until Linus's kernel.org tree adds it to mach-types.h. Once it trickles down, the definition can be removed from include/configs/dreamplug.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v7] dreamplug: initial board support.

2011-09-18 Thread Jason
Albert, Prafulla, Wolfgang, On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 07:58:14PM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Le 14/09/2011 08:39, Prafulla Wadaskar a écrit : >>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 03:00:59PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: In message you wrote: > > Let's have Wolfgang's opinion on thi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v7] dreamplug: initial board support.

2011-09-18 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Le 18/09/2011 19:58, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit : > eventually be in the Linux mach-type list". As I understand it, the only > case when is not there is because U-Boot support is submitted before make that "... when *it* is not there..." Amicalement, -- Albert. _

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v7] dreamplug: initial board support.

2011-09-18 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
(Please do not use my @free.fr address to copy me on U-boot matters...) Le 14/09/2011 08:39, Prafulla Wadaskar a écrit : > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Jason [mailto:u-b...@lakedaemon.net] >> Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 7:47 PM >> To: Wolfgang Denk >> Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar; Alber

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5 v1] integrator: make flash writeable on boot

2011-09-18 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Le 18/09/2011 15:24, Wolfgang Denk a écrit : > Dear Albert ARIBAUD, > > In message<4e75c4a4.20...@aribaud.net> you wrote: >> >> Le 18/09/2011 09:52, Linus Walleij a =E9crit : >>> This reconfigures the EBI (External Bus Interface) on the >>> integrator so that chip select 1, handling the flash memo

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5 v1] integrator: make flash writeable on boot

2011-09-18 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Albert ARIBAUD, In message <4e75c4a4.20...@aribaud.net> you wrote: > > Le 18/09/2011 09:52, Linus Walleij a =E9crit : > > This reconfigures the EBI (External Bus Interface) on the > > integrator so that chip select 1, handling the flash memory, is > > set to writeable. Without this it is not

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] punt unused clean/distclean targets

2011-09-18 Thread Graeme Russ
On 18/09/11 18:22, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Sunday, September 18, 2011 03:26:38 Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> The top level Makefile does not do any recursion into subdirs when >>> cleaning, so these clean/distclean targets in random arch/board dirs >>> never get used. Punt t

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5 v1] integrator: make flash writeable on boot

2011-09-18 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Linus, Le 18/09/2011 09:52, Linus Walleij a écrit : > This reconfigures the EBI (External Bus Interface) on the > integrator so that chip select 1, handling the flash memory, is > set to writeable. Without this it is not possible for U-Boot to > access flash memory and it crashes on startup sin

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5 v1] integrator: make flash writeable on boot

2011-09-18 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday, September 18, 2011 03:52:58 Linus Walleij wrote: > board/armltd/integrator/integrator.c | 15 > include/arm-ebi.h| 62 > ++ 2 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 0 > deletions(-) > create mode 100644 include/arm-ebi.h if the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] punt unused clean/distclean targets

2011-09-18 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday, September 18, 2011 03:26:38 Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > The top level Makefile does not do any recursion into subdirs when > > cleaning, so these clean/distclean targets in random arch/board dirs > > never get used. Punt them all. > > I think this is the wrong appr

[U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5 v1] integrator: make flash writeable on boot

2011-09-18 Thread Linus Walleij
This reconfigures the EBI (External Bus Interface) on the integrator so that chip select 1, handling the flash memory, is set to writeable. Without this it is not possible for U-Boot to access flash memory and it crashes on startup since CFI won't work properly. Since this is the first time we use

[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5 v1] integrator: use io-accessors for board init

2011-09-18 Thread Linus Walleij
Casting around to *(volatile ulong *) doesn't look good, so include the macros and use good old readl() instead. Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij --- board/armltd/integrator/integrator.c |9 + 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/board/armltd/integrator/integra

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5 v1] integrator: do not test first part of the memory

2011-09-18 Thread Linus Walleij
When booting from Flash, the Integrator remaps its flash memory from 0x2400 to 0x, and starts executing it at 0x. This ROM thus hides the RAM underneath and first 0x4 bytes of the memory cannot be tested by get_ram_size(). So let's test from 0x4 to the end of detected me

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5 v1] integrator: move text offset to config

2011-09-18 Thread Linus Walleij
Do away with the config.mk file and move the text offset to the config files to make things easier. Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij --- board/armltd/integrator/config.mk |5 - include/configs/integratorap.h|1 + include/configs/integratorcp.h|1 + 3 files changed, 2 insertio

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/5 v1] integrator: pass configs for core modules

2011-09-18 Thread Linus Walleij
Alter the board.cfg to pass core module configuration flags so we can make compile-time switches for different core modules. These are already in use for some low-level code, they just got lost in the conversion to the new build system. Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij --- boards.cfg | 16

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] punt unused clean/distclean targets

2011-09-18 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Mike Frysinger, In message <1316323020-4027-1-git-send-email-vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote: > The top level Makefile does not do any recursion into subdirs when > cleaning, so these clean/distclean targets in random arch/board dirs > never get used. Punt them all. I think this is the wrong a