Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/17] Cleanup environment related files

2011-11-13 Thread Igor Grinberg
ping On 11/07/11 13:13, Igor Grinberg wrote: This patch series cleans up environment related files in terms of checkpatch and other coding style issues. It is based on Mon, 7 Nov 2011 Wolfgang's master. There are several warnings/errors left, mostly because I don't think we need those

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] [x86] Fix some bugs in the i8402 driver when no controller is present

2011-11-13 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi Gabe, On 13/11/11 13:52, Gabe Black wrote: On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com mailto:graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Gabe, On 08/11/11 20:48, Gabe Black wrote: If no controller is present, the i8402 driver should return immediately

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] [x86] Fix some bugs in the i8402 driver when no controller is present

2011-11-13 Thread Graeme Russ
On 13/11/11 20:17, Graeme Russ wrote: Hi Gabe, [snip] - The checkpatch cleanup would be too onerous (touches too many files, the patched file is too large, too close to release) and the bugfix is critical - The bugfix covers too many files (again, Oops - forgot to proof-read ;)

Re: [U-Boot] x86 cleanup patches

2011-11-13 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi Gabe, On 13/11/11 14:08, Gabe Black wrote: So to clarify, what repository/branch should I be applying my patches to, and when? For instance, where should my patches that create a coreboot board go? I have other patches which depend on those so I'd like to get them moving again. Also having

Re: [U-Boot] arm mach-types.h

2011-11-13 Thread Michael Walle
Am Sonntag 13 November 2011, 01:32:03 schrieb Marek Vasut: - every supported board in u-boot has to be supported in mainline linux, too. because that is the basic requirement for an entry to stay in this file. No, you can define CONFIG_MACH_TYPE MACH_TYPE_SOMETHING and

[U-Boot] Attention..

2011-11-13 Thread Karen Polak Co
KAREN POLAK CO ATTORNEYS AT LAW AND LEGAL PRACTITIONERS Am Schanzengraben 25, Zurich 8047, Switzerland. THIS IS FOR YOUR ATTENTION: On behalf of Trustees and Executors of the Estate of our late client, I wish to notify you that, it is been found in our records with your name as the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] x86: Import the glibc memset implementation

2011-11-13 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi Gabe, Sorry about the lateness, but I just noticed a couple of issues.. Can you put the glibc version in the patch summary? I know it is in string.c, but including it in the summary makes it more obvious. On 13/11/11 14:00, Gabe Black wrote: The new implementation is about twice as fast as

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] x86: Change printf to puts to avoid a buffer overflow

2011-11-13 Thread Graeme Russ
On 13/11/11 13:02, Gabe Black wrote: printf as currently implemented in u-boot has a problem where it can overflow an internal buffer if it prints an expanded string that's too long. Our command lines are long enough to cause this problem. A fix should be coming, but in the mean time this

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] x86: Fix how the location of the realmode and bios blobs are calculated

2011-11-13 Thread Graeme Russ
On 13/11/11 13:31, Gabe Black wrote: From: Gabe Black gabebl...@google.com There are two blobs embedded into the u-boot image which are linked to run at an address which is different from where they actually end up in the ROM, one called realmode and one called bios. There are realmode_setup

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4] x86: Don't relocate symbols which point to things that aren't relocated

2011-11-13 Thread Graeme Russ
On 13/11/11 13:34, Gabe Black wrote: This change adds an upper bound for symbols which are fixed up after u-boot is relocated into RAM. This way portions that are left at their original location can be referred to without having to manually fix up any pointers. Signed-off-by: Gabe Black

[U-Boot] join us in New York

2011-11-13 Thread The United Nations Institute for Training and Research
The United Nations Institute for Training and Research conference 2012 Subject: UNITAR CONFERENCE INVITATION,2012 Dear Participant, We hereby commemorate you on your recommendation to partake in the forth-coming United Nations Institute for Training and Research conference, which would due

Re: [U-Boot] arm mach-types.h

2011-11-13 Thread Marek Vasut
Am Sonntag 13 November 2011, 01:32:03 schrieb Marek Vasut: - every supported board in u-boot has to be supported in mainline linux, too. because that is the basic requirement for an entry to stay in this file. No, you can define CONFIG_MACH_TYPE MACH_TYPE_SOMETHING

Re: [U-Boot] arm mach-types.h

2011-11-13 Thread Michael Walle
Am Sonntag 13 November 2011, 17:18:27 schrieb Marek Vasut: Am Sonntag 13 November 2011, 01:32:03 schrieb Marek Vasut: - every supported board in u-boot has to be supported in mainline linux, too. because that is the basic requirement for an entry to stay in this

[U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-fdt

2011-11-13 Thread Jerry Van Baren
Dear Wolfgang, Please pull the bugfixes from the following changes since commit 5721385b187b3154c7768e6c182501022f4e2e45: Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-mpc83xx (2011-11-08 07:44:52 +0100) are available in the git repository at: git://git.denx.de/u-boot-fdt.git

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Add some missing endian conversions in fdt_support.c

2011-11-13 Thread Jerry Van Baren
On 11/08/2011 04:05 AM, Gabe Black wrote: Some functions in fdt_support.c use fdt_getprop to read 32 bit values out of the device tree, but then use them directly without doing any endian conversion. Because they check for a value that doesn't actually appear in practice, the functions

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] [fdt] Fix constness of the fdt void pointer in fdt_getprop_u32_default

2011-11-13 Thread Jerry Van Baren
On 11/08/2011 04:09 AM, Gabe Black wrote: The function fdt_getprop_u32_default doesn't modify the fdt, so it can use a const void * for its fdt argument. Signed-off-by: Gabe Blackgabebl...@chromium.org Applied and requested a bugfix pull. Thanks, gvb

Re: [U-Boot] arm mach-types.h

2011-11-13 Thread Marek Vasut
Am Sonntag 13 November 2011, 17:18:27 schrieb Marek Vasut: Am Sonntag 13 November 2011, 01:32:03 schrieb Marek Vasut: - every supported board in u-boot has to be supported in mainline linux, too. because that is the basic requirement for an entry to stay in

Re: [U-Boot] arm mach-types.h

2011-11-13 Thread Michael Walle
Am Sonntag 13 November 2011, 18:14:16 schrieb Marek Vasut: Am Sonntag 13 November 2011, 17:18:27 schrieb Marek Vasut: Am Sonntag 13 November 2011, 01:32:03 schrieb Marek Vasut: - every supported board in u-boot has to be supported in mainline linux, too.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/6] i.mx: Add the initial support for freescale i.MX6Q processor

2011-11-13 Thread Marek Vasut
i.MX6Q is freescale quad core processors with ARM cortex_a9 complex. This patch is to add the initial support for this processor. Signed-off-by: Jason Liu jason@linaro.org --- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/Makefile | 48 + arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/clock.c| 388 +++

Re: [U-Boot] Using Micron (Numonyx) m28w640hcb with u-boot

2011-11-13 Thread Vipin Kumar
On 11/12/2011 5:31 PM, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote: Hi list Hi Gudjon, I have replaced the at49bv642d nor flash memory on my Atmel ngw100 board with the pin compatible m28w640hcb flash memory from Micron (formerly Numonyx). I can program the U-boot to the flash without problems

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] AT91: pio: Add PIO3 features

2011-11-13 Thread Hong Xu
This patch adds the support for new PIO controller introduced by some AT91 SoCs. New features include * More peripheral multiplexing * Pull-down, Schmitt trigger, Debouncer * More irq trigger mode (may be not interesting in U-Boot) Signed-off-by: Hong Xu hong...@atmel.com --- - Correct

Re: [U-Boot] Nokia N900 - eMMC not working after commit 02f3029f1810b99869254d0cf0a71946a008a728

2011-11-13 Thread Macpaul Lin
HI Lei Wen, 2011/11/12 Macpaul Lin macp...@gmail.com: Hi Lei Wen, 2011/11/12 Lei Wen adrian.w...@gmail.com: Hi Pali, I have got 3 times retry fail on CMD8 also with FTSDC010 in recent, too. But I'm not sure where the problem is and hasn't start to check bisect with the commits. It works

Re: [U-Boot] Nokia N900 - eMMC not working after commit 02f3029f1810b99869254d0cf0a71946a008a728

2011-11-13 Thread Lei Wen
Hi Macpaul, On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Macpaul Lin macp...@gmail.com wrote: HI Lei Wen, 2011/11/12 Macpaul Lin macp...@gmail.com: Hi Lei Wen, 2011/11/12 Lei Wen adrian.w...@gmail.com: Hi Pali, I have got 3 times retry fail on CMD8 also with FTSDC010 in recent, too. But I'm not

Re: [U-Boot] Nokia N900 - eMMC not working after commit 02f3029f1810b99869254d0cf0a71946a008a728

2011-11-13 Thread Macpaul Lin
Hi Lei Wen, 2011/11/14 Lei Wen adrian.w...@gmail.com: Hi Macpaul, I see... It seems some socs always treat cmd8 as failed...? I think it is reasonable to add a quirk configuration surround the judgement of cmd8 execution, so that even it is failed anyway, it could still go on with the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ulpi: add generic ULPI functionality

2011-11-13 Thread Igor Grinberg
Hi Jana, On 11/12/11 03:09, Jana Rapava wrote: 2011/11/8 Igor Grinberg grinb...@compulab.co.il mailto:grinb...@compulab.co.il +/* + * This is a family of wrapper functions which sets bits in ULPI registers. + * Access mode could be WRITE, SET or CLEAR. What