Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 5/7] arm, arm926ejs: Enable icache only if CONFIG_SYS_ICACHE_OFF is not defined

2012-02-01 Thread Heiko Schocher
Hello Christian, Christian Riesch wrote: > Signed-off-by: Christian Riesch > Cc: Albert Aribaud > Cc: Tom Rini > --- > arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/start.S |5 - > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) Acked-by: Heiko Schocher Tested on the cam_enc_4xx and enbw_cmc board, so:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 4/7] arm, arm926ejs: Do not clear the V bit on DA850 SoCs

2012-02-01 Thread Heiko Schocher
Hello Christian, Christian Riesch wrote: > The V bit of the c1 register of CP15 should not be cleared > since the SoC has no valid memory at 0x. > > Signed-off-by: Christian Riesch > Reported-by: Sughosh Ganu > Cc: Albert Aribaud > Cc: Tom Rini > --- > arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/start.S

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 3/7] arm, arm926ejs: Flush the data cache before disabling it

2012-02-01 Thread Heiko Schocher
Hello Christian, Christian Riesch wrote: > From: Sughosh Ganu > > The current implementation invalidates the data cache before turning it > off and causes problems on the hawkboard. See the discussion in > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-January/115212.html > > According to the ARM92

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 2/7] arm, arm926ejs: Do cpu critical inits only for boards that require it

2012-02-01 Thread Heiko Schocher
Hello Christian, Christian Riesch wrote: > This patch reverts commit ca4b55800ed74207c35271bf7335a092d4955416 > "arm, arm926ejs: always do cpu critical inits" since it impacts all > arm926ejs based configurations and caused problems, e.g., with > the hawkboard. > > Instead the patch removes the C

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 1/7] arm, davinci: Add lowlevel_init for SoCs other than DM644X

2012-02-01 Thread Heiko Schocher
Hello Christian, Christian Riesch wrote: > The low level initialization code in > arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/lowlevel_init.S was written for > DM644X SoCs only. This patch makes the lowlevel_init function in this > file a dummy function for SoCs other than DM644X. > > Signed-off-by: Christian

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v6 3/4] EXYNOS: Add SMDK5250 board support

2012-02-01 Thread Chander Kashyap
Hi Igor, On 25 January 2012 12:26, Igor Grinberg wrote: > Hi Chander, > > On 01/25/12 07:19, Chander Kashyap wrote: >> SMDK5250 board is based on Samsungs EXYNOS5250 SoC. >> >> Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap >> --- > > [...] > >> diff --git a/board/samsung/smdk5250/dmc_init.c >> b/board/samsung

[U-Boot] [PATCH 6/6] ARM: highbank: setup env from boot source register

2012-02-01 Thread Rob Herring
From: Rob Herring Add support to read the boot src register and set bootcmd env from the selected bootcmdX env setting. Based on Linkstation boot choice selection. Signed-off-by: Rob Herring --- board/highbank/highbank.c | 13 + 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

[U-Boot] [PATCH 5/6] ARM: highbank: change env config to use nvram

2012-02-01 Thread Rob Herring
From: Jason Hobbs Update the highbank config to use env from NVRAM. Also remove extra env settings as they are not used unless the default env is used. Signed-off-by: Jason Hobbs Signed-off-by: Rob Herring --- include/configs/highbank.h | 16 +++- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+

[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/6] ARM: highbank: add reset support

2012-02-01 Thread Rob Herring
From: Rob Herring Implement reset for highbank platform. Reset is triggered via a wfi instruction, so enabling armv7 for the compiler is necessary. Signed-off-by: Rob Herring --- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/highbank/config.mk |1 + board/highbank/highbank.c |8 2 files chan

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/6] ARM: highbank: Add boot counter support

2012-02-01 Thread Rob Herring
From: Rob Herring Add boot counter support using an sysreg which is persistent across reset. Signed-off-by: Rob Herring --- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/highbank/Makefile|2 +- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/highbank/bootcount.c | 36 +++ board/highbank/highbank.c

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/6] ARM: highbank: fix us_to_tick calculation

2012-02-01 Thread Rob Herring
From: Rob Herring udelay calls were off due to failing to convert us to ns. Fix this and drop the unnecessary shifts since NS_PER_TICK is only 7ns. Signed-off-by: Rob Herring --- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/highbank/timer.c |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arc

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/6] ARM: highbank: change TEXT_BASE to 0x8000

2012-02-01 Thread Rob Herring
From: Rob Herring Make some space at the beginning of RAM so the FDT can be loaded to a known fixed address at 0x1000. Signed-off-by: Rob Herring --- include/configs/highbank.h |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/configs/highbank.h b/include/config

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/6] Highbank platform updates

2012-02-01 Thread Rob Herring
From: Rob Herring This is a collection of updates to Calxeda highbank platform that adds environment in nvram, boot counter, reset and bootcmd selection support. Regards, Rob Jason Hobbs (1): ARM: highbank: change env config to use nvram Rob Herring (5): ARM: highbank: fix us_to_tick calcu

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 5/5] i.mx6q: mx6qsabrelite: Update the network configuration

2012-02-01 Thread Jason Hui
Troy, On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Troy Kisky wrote: > On 2/1/2012 6:14 PM, Troy Kisky wrote: >> >> +       ksz9021_phy_write(phydev, 0, 0x105, 0x0);       /* min rx data >> delay */ >> +       ksz9021_phy_write(phydev, 0, 0x106, 0x0);       /* min tx data >> delay */ >> +       /* max rx/tx c

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 5/5] i.mx6q: mx6qsabrelite: Update the network configuration

2012-02-01 Thread Troy Kisky
On 2/1/2012 6:14 PM, Troy Kisky wrote: + ksz9021_phy_write(phydev, 0, 0x105, 0x0); /* min rx data delay */ + ksz9021_phy_write(phydev, 0, 0x106, 0x0); /* min tx data delay */ + /* max rx/tx clock delay, min rx/tx control */ + ksz9021_phy_write(phydev, 0, 0x104,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/5] net: fec_mxc: add 1000 Mbps selection

2012-02-01 Thread Troy Kisky
On 2/1/2012 6:14 PM, Troy Kisky wrote: Define CONFIG_FEC_QUIRK_ENET_MAC and add to board files mx6qarm2 and mx6qsabrelite. Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky Acked-by: Dirk Behme --- drivers/net/fec_mxc.c | 21 +++-- drivers/net/fec_mxc.h |2 ++ include/confi

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 5/5] i.mx6q: mx6qsabrelite: Update the network configuration

2012-02-01 Thread Troy Kisky
Define CONFIG_PHY_MICREL, and minimize the tx clock delay. There is an issue with 1000 baseTx mode on early revs of the SabreLite boards. The center tap pin 9 of the mag RJ45 USB combo was connected to the 3.3 filtered supply. Letting this pin float solved the problem. Symptoms of the problem were

[U-Boot] 85xx custodianship

2012-02-01 Thread Andy Fleming
Kumar, in connection with his imminent departure from Freescale, has asked Wolfgang to step down from custodianship for U-Boot for 85xx and 86xx. As such, I will be re-assuming those duties. Please make sure to copy me on all 85xx-related patches in the future (most of the patches have been, so thi

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/5] net: fec_mxc: add PHYLIB support

2012-02-01 Thread Troy Kisky
Also, surround non PHYLIB routines miiphy_restart_aneg and miiphy_wait_aneg with ifndef CONFIG_PHYLIB. Make fec_miiphy_read, and fec_miiphy_write call a routine common with PHYLIB version so that when later PHYLIB is required it is easy to delete the non-PHYLIB code. This separation idea came from

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/5] net: fec_mxc: add 1000 Mbps selection

2012-02-01 Thread Troy Kisky
Define CONFIG_FEC_QUIRK_ENET_MAC and add to board files mx6qarm2 and mx6qsabrelite. Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky Acked-by: Dirk Behme --- drivers/net/fec_mxc.c | 21 +++-- drivers/net/fec_mxc.h |2 ++ include/configs/mx6qarm2.h |1 + include/confi

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/5] net: phy: add support for Micrel's KSZ9021

2012-02-01 Thread Troy Kisky
Add the gigabit phy KSZ9021. Also, add function ksz9021_phy_write for access to the phys extended registers. The environment variable "disable_giga" can be used to disable 1000baseTx. Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky Acked-by: Dirk Behme --- drivers/net/phy/micrel.c | 82

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 4/5] net: phy: make board_phy_config responsible for calling drv->config

2012-02-01 Thread Troy Kisky
Boards may have things they want done before or after normal phy config. Letting the boards call drv->config allows them more flexibilty. Boards affected by this change are corenet_ds and mpc8544ds. Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky Acked-by: Dirk Behme --- board/freescale/corenet_ds/eth_p4080.c |2

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/5 v2] sandbox: add lseek helper

2012-02-01 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Mike, On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > Follow up patches want to be able to seek fd's. > > Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger > --- >  arch/sandbox/cpu/os.c |   13 + >  include/os.h          |   15 +++ >  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 0 deletio

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3] net: allow setting env enetaddr from net device setting

2012-02-01 Thread Rob Herring
From: Rob Herring If the net driver has setup a valid ethernet address and an ethernet address is not set in the environment already, then set the environment variables from the net driver setting. This enables pxe booting on boards which don't set ethaddr env variable. Signed-off-by: Rob Herri

[U-Boot] [PATCH] net: calxedaxgmac: fix build due to missing __aligned definition

2012-02-01 Thread Rob Herring
From: Rob Herring Include linux/compiler.h to fix build error due to missing __aligned definition. Signed-off-by: Rob Herring --- drivers/net/calxedaxgmac.c |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/calxedaxgmac.c b/drivers/net/calxedaxgmac.c index 01

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4] arm, arm-kirkwood: disable l2c before linux boot

2012-02-01 Thread Ian Campbell
On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 19:24 +0100, Michael Walle wrote: > The decompressor expects the L2 cache to be disabled. This fixes booting > some kernels, which have CONFIG_ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT enabled. I applied this locally and was able to boot a 3.2 Linux kernel on my dreamplug where before I was having

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V6 - Part 3 - 0/2] SPI flash enhancements: allow default bus and chip-selects

2012-02-01 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 01 February 2012 14:31:39 Eric Nelson wrote: > On 02/01/2012 10:00 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Wednesday 01 February 2012 06:30:04 Stefano Babic wrote: > >> On 31/01/2012 20:14, Eric Nelson wrote: > >>> On 01/31/2012 11:11 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tuesday 31 January 201

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] SPL: Add YMODEM over UART load support

2012-02-01 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Tom Rini, > > In message > you > wrote: >> >> Maybe we need to separate out the systems which are very resource >> constrained from the ones that aren't, share code where we can and >> make that code obviously marked as such. > > I th

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] SPL: Add YMODEM over UART load support

2012-02-01 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Tom Rini, > > In message > you > wrote: >> >> > I object against opening this pandora box. >> > >> > If you have so ample resources to run such code, then load a minimal >> > configuration of U-Boot. >> >> Is this a change of heart th

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] SPL: Add YMODEM over UART load support

2012-02-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Tom Rini, In message you wrote: > > > I object against opening this pandora box. > > > > If you have so ample resources to run such code, then load a minimal > > configuration of U-Boot. > > Is this a change of heart then? No - I never was happy about pulling arbitrary code into SPL. >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] SPL: Add YMODEM over UART load support

2012-02-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Tom Rini, In message you wrote: > > Maybe we need to separate out the systems which are very resource > constrained from the ones that aren't, share code where we can and > make that code obviously marked as such. I think it's the other way round. You ned to find out which code is safe to

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] SPL: Add YMODEM over UART load support

2012-02-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Scott Wood, In message <4f29811d.5080...@freescale.com> you wrote: > > What's the alternative -- another name and separate makefile > infrastructure for non-minimal initial loaders? No, configura and use a small U-Boot image where the normal execution environment can be guaranteed. > It's i

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] SPL: Add YMODEM over UART load support

2012-02-01 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Tom Rini, > > In message > you > wrote: >> >> > What originally has been designed to be minimal code now start to pull >> > in all kinds of other crap, that has never been designed to run before >> > relocation. >> >> Boards that don'

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] SPL: Add YMODEM over UART load support

2012-02-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Tom Rini, In message you wrote: > > > What originally has been designed to be minimal code now start to pull > > in all kinds of other crap, that has never been designed to run before > > relocation. > > Boards that don't need it can opt out. We use this internally for > automated testing

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V6 - Part 3 - 0/2] SPI flash enhancements: allow default bus and chip-selects

2012-02-01 Thread Eric Nelson
On 02/01/2012 10:00 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Wednesday 01 February 2012 06:30:04 Stefano Babic wrote: On 31/01/2012 20:14, Eric Nelson wrote: On 01/31/2012 11:11 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Tuesday 31 January 2012 12:52:06 Eric Nelson wrote: Patch 1 modifies the 'sf' command to allow a d

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] SPL: Add YMODEM over UART load support

2012-02-01 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Scott Wood wrote: > On 02/01/2012 04:24 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> Dear Tom Rini, >> >> In message <1328047438-26294-1-git-send-email-tr...@ti.com> you wrote: >>> From: Matt Porter >>> >>> Adds support for loading U-Boot from UART using YMODEM protocol. >>> If YM

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4] arm, arm-kirkwood: disable l2c before linux boot

2012-02-01 Thread Michael Walle
The decompressor expects the L2 cache to be disabled. This fixes booting some kernels, which have CONFIG_ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT enabled. Signed-off-by: Michael Walle Acked-by: Prafulla Wadaskar Cc: Albert ARIBAUD Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar Cc: Wolfgang Denk --- v4: update copyright year of arch/arm

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] SPL: Add YMODEM over UART load support

2012-02-01 Thread Scott Wood
On 02/01/2012 04:24 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Tom Rini, > > In message <1328047438-26294-1-git-send-email-tr...@ti.com> you wrote: >> From: Matt Porter >> >> Adds support for loading U-Boot from UART using YMODEM protocol. >> If YMODEM support is enabled in SPL and the romcode indicates >>

[U-Boot] [PATCH] AM3517: Changed default clock rate for AM3517

2012-02-01 Thread Stefano Babic
From: Schuyler Patton AM3517: Changed default clock rate for AM3517 Changed #define MPU_M_13_ES2 from 0x1F4 to 0x258, this allows the AM3517 to boot up at 600MHz instead of 500 MHz Signed-off-by: Schuyler Patton CC: Tom Rini CC: Simon Schwarz CC: Stefano Babic --- This patch was sent to th

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V6 - Part 3 - 0/2] SPI flash enhancements: allow default bus and chip-selects

2012-02-01 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 01 February 2012 06:30:04 Stefano Babic wrote: > On 31/01/2012 20:14, Eric Nelson wrote: > > On 01/31/2012 11:11 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> On Tuesday 31 January 2012 12:52:06 Eric Nelson wrote: > >>> Patch 1 modifies the 'sf' command to allow a default bus and > >>> chip-select >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] post: new parallel nor flash test

2012-02-01 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 01 February 2012 02:47:32 Vaibhav Kothari wrote: > i am asking about possibility that in function 'write_buff' > there is no checking of protect[] status...so how to get sure that over > uboot sector is protected or not??? your summary doesn't seem to match the actual question here .

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] i.MX28: Fix VDDIO and VDDA setup

2012-02-01 Thread Robert Deliën
> Ok, what happens if you replace mx28_dram_init() with: > > while (!readl(0x8001c280)) > mx28_mem_init(); I'm sorry for my late response; I was attending an FPGA workshop today. I will test this first thing in the morning, when I'm at the office. ___

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 0/7] Change ARM926EJ-S startup code, hawkboard and calimain

2012-02-01 Thread Sughosh Ganu
hi Christian, On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Christian Riesch < christian.rie...@omicron.at> wrote: > Hi, > > In this patchset I tried to put everything from the discussion > in http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-January/115212.html > > Although this is the first version of this patchse

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] SPL: Add YMODEM over UART load support

2012-02-01 Thread Tom Rini
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:40 PM, Christian Riesch wrote: > Hi Tom, Hi Matt, > > On Tuesday, January 31, 2012, Tom Rini wrote: >> From: Matt Porter >> >> Adds support for loading U-Boot from UART using YMODEM protocol. >> If YMODEM support is enabled in SPL and the romcode indicates >> that SPL

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] SPL: Add YMODEM over UART load support

2012-02-01 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 3:24 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Tom Rini, > > In message <1328047438-26294-1-git-send-email-tr...@ti.com> you wrote: >> From: Matt Porter >> >> Adds support for loading U-Boot from UART using YMODEM protocol. >> If YMODEM support is enabled in SPL and the romcode indic

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/4] ehci-omap: Clean up added ehci-omap.c

2012-02-01 Thread Igor Grinberg
On 02/01/12 13:26, Stefano Babic wrote: > On 01/02/2012 12:01, Igor Grinberg wrote: > >> Thanks for testing! >> >> Govidraj, can the "enabling the ULPI for boards" reside >> in a separate patch and also include the boards that were >> tested with it (e.g. TAM3517)? > > Well, this is maybe too muc

Re: [U-Boot] Memory testing of flash

2012-02-01 Thread vaibhav kothari
Thnx for the previous post You said that it is not fruitful idea to test flash post test at every boot up as it is reduces the life cycle of flash??is there any mechanism to prevent that? and also i am using spi serial w25x32 flash and i dont know if it is CFI complaint or not but i know the boar

[U-Boot] u-boot in debug mode P2020

2012-02-01 Thread Ivan Neskorodev
Hello I try to run u-boot-2009.11 on the chip P2020 from SDcard. When i run u-boot i see in the terminal: CPU0: P2020E, Version: 2.1, (0x80ea0021) Core: E500, Version: 5.1, (0x80211051) Clock Configuration: CPU0:1200 MHz, CPU1:1200 MHz, CCB:600 MHz, DDR:300 MHz (600 MT/s d

[U-Boot] ARM ld: .bss overlaps section .rel.dyn

2012-02-01 Thread Amit Virdi
Hi All, I'm in the process of updating platform support for spear series of SoC on the latest u-boot. I picked u-boot v2011.12. I tried compiling for different spear boards (spear 300, 310, 300 and spear600). In every compilation, I'm getting following errors: --- arm-linux-ld

Re: [U-Boot] SPL Linux Boot

2012-02-01 Thread Stefano Babic
On 31/01/2012 15:26, Tom Rini wrote: >> A way can be to add an arch weak function to add arch specific >> initialization inside board_init_*() functions, if any. Have you seen >> other issues other what I report now ? > > That sounds about right. In short, ./MAKEALL -s arm still needs to > buil

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] i.mx: i.mx5: update imx_get_mac_from_fuse function

2012-02-01 Thread Stefano Babic
On 31/01/2012 13:07, Jason Liu wrote: > FEC does not work on the i.mx51/53evk board, it will hangup > In:serial > Out: serial > Err: serial > Net: > Applied to u-boot-imx, thanks. Best regards, Stefano Babic -- = DENX

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V6 - Part 3 - 0/2] SPI flash enhancements: allow default bus and chip-selects

2012-02-01 Thread Dirk Behme
On 01.02.2012 12:30, Stefano Babic wrote: On 31/01/2012 20:14, Eric Nelson wrote: On 01/31/2012 11:11 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Tuesday 31 January 2012 12:52:06 Eric Nelson wrote: Patch 1 modifies the 'sf' command to allow a default bus and chip-select to be specified by board headers. This

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V6 - Part 3 - 0/2] SPI flash enhancements: allow default bus and chip-selects

2012-02-01 Thread Stefano Babic
On 31/01/2012 20:14, Eric Nelson wrote: > On 01/31/2012 11:11 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> On Tuesday 31 January 2012 12:52:06 Eric Nelson wrote: >>> Patch 1 modifies the 'sf' command to allow a default bus and chip-select >>> to be specified by board headers. This allows a bare 'sf' probe command:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V6 - Part 5 - 1/1] mx6q: mx6qsabrelite: Conditionally define macros for environment in serial flash

2012-02-01 Thread Jason Hui
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Eric Nelson wrote: > The default settings store the persistent environment on SD card > and not serial flash (SPI NOR). > > To use SPI NOR to save the environment instead of SD card, edit > include/configs/mx6qsabrelite.h and > > - undefine CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_MMC > -

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V6 - Part 4 - 1/1] mx6q: mx6qsabrelite: Provide default serial flash bus and chip-select

2012-02-01 Thread Jason Hui
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Eric Nelson wrote: > Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson > Acked-by: Dirk Behme > Acked-by: Stefano Babic > --- >  board/freescale/mx6qsabrelite/mx6qsabrelite.c |    2 +- >  include/configs/mx6qsabrelite.h               |    2 ++ >  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 del

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V6 - Part 2 - 2/2] README: Add description of SPI Flash (SF) command configuration

2012-02-01 Thread Jason Hui
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Eric Nelson wrote: > Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson > --- >  README |   20 >  1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) Acked-by: Jason Liu > > diff --git a/README b/README > index 9d713e8..4dbebcb 100644 > --- a/README > +++ b/README >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V6 - Part 3 - 1/2] sf command: allow default bus and chip selects

2012-02-01 Thread Jason Hui
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Eric Nelson wrote: > This patch allows a board configuration file to provide default bus > and chip-selects for SPI flash so that first argument to the 'sf' command > is optional. > > On boards that use the mxc_spi driver and a GPIO for chip select, this allows > a

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/4] ehci-omap: Clean up added ehci-omap.c

2012-02-01 Thread Stefano Babic
On 01/02/2012 12:01, Igor Grinberg wrote: > Thanks for testing! > > Govidraj, can the "enabling the ULPI for boards" reside > in a separate patch and also include the boards that were > tested with it (e.g. TAM3517)? Well, this is maybe too much ;-) ... and Govidraj has no possibility to test i

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V6 - Part 2 - 3/3] mx6q: mx6qsabrelite: Add ECSPI support to the Sabrelite platform

2012-02-01 Thread Jason Hui
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Eric Nelson wrote: > Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson > Acked-by: Dirk Behme > Acked-by: Stefano Babic > --- >  board/freescale/mx6qsabrelite/imximage.cfg    |    2 +- >  board/freescale/mx6qsabrelite/mx6qsabrelite.c |   25 > + >  include/confi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V6 - Part 2 - 2/3] mx6q: Add support for ECSPI through mxc_spi driver

2012-02-01 Thread Jason Hui
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Eric Nelson wrote: > Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson > Acked-by: Dirk Behme > Acked-by: Stefano Babic > --- >  arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/imx-regs.h |   44 > ++ >  1 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) Acked-by: Jason Liu

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V6 - Part 2 - 1/3] mxc_spi: move machine specifics into CPU headers

2012-02-01 Thread Jason Hui
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Eric Nelson wrote: > Move (E)CSPI register declarations into the imx-regs.h files for each > supported CPU > > Introduce two new macros to control conditional setup >     MXC_CSPI - Used for processors with the Configurable Serial Peripheral > Interface (MX3x) >  

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/4] ehci-omap: Clean up added ehci-omap.c

2012-02-01 Thread Igor Grinberg
Hi Stefano, On 01/29/12 13:42, Stefano Babic wrote: > On 29/01/2012 10:42, Igor Grinberg wrote: >> Hi Govindraj, >> > > Hi all, > >> Put Remy on Cc. > > Remy resigned as USB maintainer - but Tom is aware about these patches... Right. This patch touches the USB subsystem, therefore I put Remy i

Re: [U-Boot] Can u-Boot Ran from RAM?

2012-02-01 Thread Marek Vasut
> Dear Marek Vasut, > > In message <20120201.09465.marek.va...@gmail.com> you wrote: > > > On Monday 30 January 2012 23:07:05 Bud Miljkovic wrote: > > > > While getting acquainted with possible u-Boot development issues, I > > > > read FAQ "14.2.1. Can U-Boot be configured such that it can be

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] arm, arm-kirkwood: disable l2c before linux boot

2012-02-01 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
> -Original Message- > From: Michael Walle [mailto:mich...@walle.cc] > Sent: 01 February 2012 04:53 > To: u-boot@lists.denx.de > Cc: Michael Walle; Albert ARIBAUD; Prafulla Wadaskar; Wolfgang Denk > Subject: [PATCH v3] arm, arm-kirkwood: disable l2c before linux boot > > The decompressor

[U-Boot] [PATCH] post: new parallel nor flash test

2012-02-01 Thread Vaibhav Kothari
 i am asking about possibility that in function 'write_buff' there is no checking of protect[] status...so how to get sure that over uboot sector is protected or not??? thanks in advanece___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de

Re: [U-Boot] Can u-Boot Ran from RAM?

2012-02-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Marek Vasut, In message <20120202.28009.marek.va...@gmail.com> you wrote: > > The FAQ really means "is it possible to load u-boot from u-boot" ... which is > possible in some cases, but officially unsupported. This is your interpretation, and it is not quite correct. Best regards, Wol

Re: [U-Boot] Can u-Boot Ran from RAM?

2012-02-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Marek Vasut, In message <20120201.09465.marek.va...@gmail.com> you wrote: > > On Monday 30 January 2012 23:07:05 Bud Miljkovic wrote: > > > While getting acquainted with possible u-Boot development issues, I read > > > FAQ "14.2.1. Can U-Boot be configured such that it can be started in

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] SPL: Add YMODEM over UART load support

2012-02-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Tom Rini, In message <1328047438-26294-1-git-send-email-tr...@ti.com> you wrote: > From: Matt Porter > > Adds support for loading U-Boot from UART using YMODEM protocol. > If YMODEM support is enabled in SPL and the romcode indicates > that SPL loaded via UART then SPL will wait for start o

Re: [U-Boot] Can u-Boot Ran from RAM?

2012-02-01 Thread Marek Vasut
> On 01/30/2012 09:07 PM, Bud Miljkovic wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > > > > > While getting acquainted with possible u-Boot development issues, I read > > FAQ "14.2.1. Can U-Boot be configured such that it can be started in > > RAM?" and was puzzled to learn that u-Boot cannot run from RAM. > >

Re: [U-Boot] Can u-Boot Ran from RAM?

2012-02-01 Thread Marek Vasut
> On Monday 30 January 2012 23:07:05 Bud Miljkovic wrote: > > While getting acquainted with possible u-Boot development issues, I read > > FAQ "14.2.1. Can U-Boot be configured such that it can be started in > > RAM?" and was puzzled to learn that u-Boot cannot run from RAM. > > you misread it.

[U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc/usb: fix bug of CPU halt when missing USB PHY clock

2012-02-01 Thread Shengzhou Liu
when missing USB PHY clock and issuing "usb start" at u-boot prompt, writing to or_portsc register will cause CPU halt. We should check USBGP[PHY_CLK_VALID] bit at the first time in ehci_hcd_init() to avoid CPU hang in this case. Signed-off-by: Shengzhou Liu --- drivers/usb/host/ehci-fsl.c | 2