Re: [U-Boot] Formatting bootable SD, freescale platform

> Hello, > > Does anybody happen to know a reference with _details_ of how to format and > mkfs an SD card to be bootable for freescale platform? Google for p1010rdb SD boot? M > > Background: I'm using a freescale utility ( > https://github.com/kergoth/boot-format), but it fails at runtime,

[U-Boot] Refactoring eth_write_hwaddr() and friends (was: Re: [PATCH v2] net/eth.c: fix eth_write_hwaddr() to use dev->enetaddr as fall back)

On 23.01.2012 08:31, Simon Glass wrote: ... Note: This resend is based on my understanding from http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-January/116118.html Please let Eric and me know if I missed anything there. I don't think you have missed anything and I have already acked this

Re: [U-Boot] Does U-boot support ASLR?

Dear Jason, please keep the ML on Cc: In message <4f33e93e.5070...@ggsg.cisco.com> you wrote: > > Do you happen to have a reference to that presentation? I'm very > interested, as i thought ASLR was in place to make it harder. I've done > a weak google search but haven't turned up anything

[U-Boot] Problem in loading rootfs

Hi, I am facing problem in loading my image on Netgear GSM7353S switch. Let me give you some context 1. I started with following link http://www.openflowhub.org/display/Indigo/Upgrading+the+Flash+of+the+Netgear+73xx+for+OpenFlow . 2. Link said to copy the image using command *flashcp

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 9/9] tegra: i2c: Enable I2C on Seaboard

Hello Simon, Simon Glass wrote: > This enables I2C on Seaboard. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass > --- > Changes in v3: > - Use CONFIG_TEGRA_I2C instead of CONFIG_TEGRA2_I2C > > include/configs/seaboard.h |8 > 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) Acked-by: Heiko Schoch

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 8/9] tegra: i2c: Select number of controllers for Tegra2 boards

Hello Simon, Simon Glass wrote: > The Tegra 2x SOC has four ports, so define TEGRA_I2C_NUM_CONTROLLERS > in the shared config file. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass > --- > > include/configs/tegra2-common.h |3 +++ > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) Acked-by: Heiko Schocher

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 7/9] tegra: i2c: Select I2C ordering for Seaboard

Hello Simon, Simon Glass wrote: > Select the port ordering for I2C on Seaboard. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass > --- > Changes in v2: > - Disable port 2 as it is not used > > Changes in v3: > - Move speed setting from tegra20.dtsi to board .dts file > > board/nvidia/dts/tegra2-seaboard.dts |

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 6/9] tegra: i2c: Initialise I2C on Nvidia boards

Hello Simon, Simon Glass wrote: > This enables I2C on all Nvidia boards including Seaboard and > Harmony. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass > --- > Changes in v2: > - Add build warning if CONFIG_SYS_I2C_INIT_BOARD is not defined > > Changes in v3: > - Use CONFIG_TEGRA_I2C instead of CONFIG_TEGRA2_

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 5/9] tegra: i2c: Add I2C driver

Hello Simon, Simon Glass wrote: > From: Yen Lin > > Add basic i2c driver for Tegra2 with 8- and 16-bit address support. > The driver requires CONFIG_OF_CONTROL to obtain its configuration > from the device tree. > > (Simon Glass: s...@chromium.org modified for upstream) > > Signed-off-by: Simo

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 4/9] tegra: fdt: i2c: Add extra I2C bindings for U-Boot

Hello Simon, Simon Glass wrote: > Add U-Boot's peripheral clock information to the Tegra20 device tree file. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass > --- > Changes in v2: > - Adjust definitions to fit new peripheral clock bindings > - Change 'speed' to 'clock-frequency' > - Remove u-boot,pinmux binding

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/2] da850evm: read mac address from I2C EEPROM on AM18x EVM

add support to read mac address for AM18x EVM manufactured from Spectrum digital which have mac address stored in I2C EEPROM manufactured by WINBOND. This patch reads mac address from I2C EEPROM and sets the environment variable if not set, If mac address is already present in environment compare i

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/9] tegra: Add I2C driver and associated parts

Hello tom, Tom Warren wrote: > Heiko, > >> -Original Message- >> From: Heiko Schocher [mailto:h...@denx.de] >> Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 12:02 AM >> To: Simon Glass >> Cc: U-Boot Mailing List; linux-te...@vger.kernel.org; Tom Warren >> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/9] tegra: A

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] da850evm: add support to read mac address from SPI flash

add support to read mac address for da850/L138 evm manufactured by Logic PD which store mac address in SPI flash manufactured by ST Microelectronics. This patch adds support to read mac address from SPI flash and set the mac address if it hasn't been set in environment, If it has been set in the en

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/2] da850evm: add board specific functions

There are two da850 SOC based EVMs, one from Spectrum digital and other from Logic PD. Boards from Spectrum digital have mac address stored in I2C EEPROM and they have spi flash manufactured by WINBOND. Boards from Logic PD store mac address in ST Microelectronics SPI flash. This patch series adds

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3] davinci: cleanup davinci_sync_env_enetaddr() fucntion

check for the return status for eth_getenv_enetaddr_by_index() and eth_setenv_enetaddr() functions and print appropriate message on failure. Signed-off-by: Manjunath Hadli Cc: Tom Rini Cc: Mike Frysinger Cc: Wolfgang Denk --- Changes for v3: undo conversion of debug statement to printf().

[U-Boot] please pull u-boot-samsung/master

Dear Albert, The following changes since commit ca849aa4b86b282f837c58a0b129460ebfad2239: ARM: activate DISPLAY_CPUINFO for VCMA9 + SMDK2410 board (2012-02-06 22:47:25 +0100) are available in the git repository at: git://git.denx.de/u-boot-samsung master Chander Kashyap (8): Exynos:

[U-Boot] Formatting bootable SD, freescale platform

Hello, Does anybody happen to know a reference with _details_ of how to format and mkfs an SD card to be bootable for freescale platform? Background: I'm using a freescale utility ( https://github.com/kergoth/boot-format), but it fails at runtime, unhappy with my SD MBR. Console output is shown

[U-Boot] Password protection of U-Boot command line

Hi All, As an adjunct to a recent discussion, I wonder if there would be much point in password protecting access to the U-Boot command line. The password could be saved in an environment variable as an MD-5 or SHA-256 hash. But I wonder if: a) It's worth it, and; b) If it would be secure anyw

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] EXYNOS: SMDK5250: Add support for DDR3 memory.

Dear Chander, Thanks for your review. Please find inline my replies to your comments. On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Chander Kashyap wrote: > Dear Hatim, > > On 8 February 2012 17:14, Hatim Ali wrote: > > SMDK5250 development boards have different memory variants like > > DDR3, LPDDR2 and LPDD

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5] efikamx: Fix CONFIG_SYS_MEMTEST_END

> CONFIG_SYS_MEMTEST_END should be higher than CONFIG_SYS_MEMTEST_START. > > Cc: Marek Vasut > Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam > --- > include/configs/efikamx.h |2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/configs/efikamx.h b/include/configs/efikamx.h > i

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] SMDK5250: Add ethernet support

On 10 February 2012 02:00, Simon Glass wrote: > On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 3:26 AM, Chander Kashyap > wrote: >> This patch enable support for SMC911X based ethernet device. >> >> Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap > > Acked-by: Simon Glass > >> --- >> Changes in v2: >>        - As Simon pointed smc9115

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 18/28] net: Add NetUpdateEther() to handle ARP or Ping replies (VLAN or SNAP)

Hi Mike, On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thursday 19 January 2012 19:53:21 Joe Hershberger wrote: >> --- a/net/net.c >> +++ b/net/net.c >> >> +int >> +NetUpdateEther(struct Ethernet_t *et, uchar *addr, uint prot) >> +{ >> +     ushort protlen; >> + >> +     memcpy(et->e

[U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5] efikamx: Fix CONFIG_SYS_MEMTEST_END

CONFIG_SYS_MEMTEST_END should be higher than CONFIG_SYS_MEMTEST_START. Cc: Marek Vasut Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam --- include/configs/efikamx.h |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/configs/efikamx.h b/include/configs/efikamx.h index e2f0f74..af542f

[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5] mx53smd: Fix CONFIG_SYS_MEMTEST_END

CONFIG_SYS_MEMTEST_END should be higher than CONFIG_SYS_MEMTEST_START. Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam --- include/configs/mx53smd.h |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/configs/mx53smd.h b/include/configs/mx53smd.h index 032f722..a04db3f 100644 --- a/in

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5] mx53evk: Fix CONFIG_SYS_MEMTEST_END

CONFIG_SYS_MEMTEST_END should be higher than CONFIG_SYS_MEMTEST_START. Cc: Jason Liu Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam --- include/configs/mx53evk.h |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/configs/mx53evk.h b/include/configs/mx53evk.h index 11fe6ef..a77e5b2

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] mx51evk: Fix CONFIG_SYS_MEMTEST_END

CONFIG_SYS_MEMTEST_END should be higher than CONFIG_SYS_MEMTEST_START. Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam --- include/configs/mx51evk.h |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/configs/mx51evk.h b/include/configs/mx51evk.h index 3b18a18..1477b21 100644 --- a/in

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/5] mx31pdk: Fix CONFIG_SYS_MEMTEST_END

CONFIG_SYS_MEMTEST_END should be higher than CONFIG_SYS_MEMTEST_START. Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam --- include/configs/mx31pdk.h |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/configs/mx31pdk.h b/include/configs/mx31pdk.h index 4da6020..49d440b 100644 --- a/in

Re: [U-Boot] Does U-boot support ASLR?

Hi Jason, On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Jason Markley (ggsg) wrote: > > > On 2/9/12 5:16 PM, Graeme Russ wrote: >> Hi Guys, >> >> My 2c worth... >> >> The thought of applying ASLR to improve security is pointless unless you >> have identified a reason to do so. You can't just apply a security

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] EXYNOS: SMDK5250: Add support for DDR3 memory.

Hatim, Overall comments: * Random delays are evil. Please explain each sdelay() call. Be sure to include information about why exactly 65,536 iterations through a delay loop is necessary in each case. * For functions that are nearly the same between dmc_init.c and dmc_init_ddr3.c should be un

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 5/9] tegra: i2c: Add I2C driver

On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 17:13 -0800, Simon Glass wrote: > From: Yen Lin > > Add basic i2c driver for Tegra2 with 8- and 16-bit address support. > The driver requires CONFIG_OF_CONTROL to obtain its configuration > from the device tree. > > (Simon Glass: s...@chromium.org modified for upstream) >

Re: [U-Boot] Does U-boot support ASLR?

On 2/9/12 5:16 PM, Graeme Russ wrote: > Hi Guys, > > My 2c worth... > > The thought of applying ASLR to improve security is pointless unless you > have identified a reason to do so. You can't just apply a security > hardening technique willy-nilly and expect you security to improve. The > securit

[U-Boot] How to use external fdt file with kernel+initramfs uimage?

Hi, I can boot my (powerpc 440gx) board as a "triple" uImage (kernel + external_initramfs + fdt) using tftp. (external_initramfs here means an initramfs gzip'd cpio file archive that is not linked into the kernel as one file.) I can also load the individual components and boot via bootm. What I

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 09/28] net: cosmetic: Un-typedef variables in net

Hi Mike, On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thursday 19 January 2012 19:53:12 Joe Hershberger wrote: >> Un-typedef IP_t, Ethernet_t, VLAN_Ethernet_t, ARP_t, ICMP_t > > i'm not sure about this.  i don't mind the typedefs myself and they have the > advantage of already being

Re: [U-Boot] Does U-boot support ASLR?

Hi Guys, My 2c worth... The thought of applying ASLR to improve security is pointless unless you have identified a reason to do so. You can't just apply a security hardening technique willy-nilly and expect you security to improve. The security of a system is equal to the weakest link and no amou

Re: [U-Boot] Configuration settings for Freescale i.MX53x demo boards

On 02/09/2012 03:37 PM, Bud Miljkovic wrote: > Hello Jason Liu, > > > > Is there a glossary for the defines used in the > /include/configs/ files? The symbols should be documented in README or under doc/ (though some are probably missing). -Scott _

Re: [U-Boot] Configuration settings for Freescale i.MX53x demo boards

On Friday 10 February 2012 10:37:44 Bud Miljkovic wrote: > Hello Jason Liu, > > > > Is there a glossary for the defines used in the > /include/configs/ files? I find it far easier to just grep the code. -- Charles ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.d

[U-Boot] Configuration settings for Freescale i.MX53x demo boards

Hello Jason Liu, Is there a glossary for the defines used in the /include/configs/ files? Regards, Bud Miljkovic ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] Does U-boot support ASLR?

On 2/9/12 2:28 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > On 02/09/2012 12:58 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> On Thursday 09 February 2012 13:37:15 Jason Markley wrote: >> >> please don't top post, and keep the mailing list in cc >> >>> I agree any proposal would need to be accompanied by good reasoning. >>> I'm hones

Re: [U-Boot] Does U-boot support ASLR?

On 2/9/12 3:34 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thursday 09 February 2012 15:06:48 Scott Wood wrote: >> As for tftpload not having length bounds, that's the kind of thing that >> anyone trying to put together a secure loader would want to fix >> (assuming they're using tftpload in the first place)

Re: [U-Boot] Build u-Boot for NAND boot on i.MX53x platform

On 02/09/2012 02:04 PM, Charles Manning wrote: > On Wednesday 08 February 2012 17:16:10 Bud Miljkovic wrote: >> Can someone clue me in how one goes about a NAND bootable u-Boot? >> > > Bud > > You can't actually run uboot from NAND per se. The rom boot loader reads the > image into ram where it

Re: [U-Boot] Does U-boot support ASLR?

On Thursday 09 February 2012 15:06:48 Scott Wood wrote: > As for tftpload not having length bounds, that's the kind of thing that > anyone trying to put together a secure loader would want to fix > (assuming they're using tftpload in the first place) which is my point -- u-boot is so completely op

Re: [U-Boot] Does U-boot support ASLR?

On Thursday 09 February 2012 14:55:09 Jason Markley wrote: > that ASLR on such a platform doesn't make sense, but who's to say it > wouldn't be useful for other boards? you have yet to show how it'd be useful. as the person proposing the new feature, it's on you to show why it isn't just a waste

Re: [U-Boot] Does U-boot support ASLR?

On 02/09/2012 01:50 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thursday 09 February 2012 14:28:07 Scott Wood wrote: >> On 02/09/2012 12:58 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> On Thursday 09 February 2012 13:37:15 Jason Markley wrote: I agree any proposal would need to be accompanied by good reasoning. I'm

Re: [U-Boot] Build u-Boot for NAND boot on i.MX53x platform

On Wednesday 08 February 2012 17:16:10 Bud Miljkovic wrote: > Can someone clue me in how one goes about a NAND bootable u-Boot? > Bud You can't actually run uboot from NAND per se. The rom boot loader reads the image into ram where it runs. Based on my experience with omap - which uses a very s

Re: [U-Boot] Does U-boot support ASLR?

On 2/9/12 2:50 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thursday 09 February 2012 14:28:07 Scott Wood wrote: >> On 02/09/2012 12:58 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> On Thursday 09 February 2012 13:37:15 Jason Markley wrote: I agree any proposal would need to be accompanied by good reasoning. I'm hon

Re: [U-Boot] Does U-boot support ASLR?

On 2/9/12 2:28 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > On 02/09/2012 12:58 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> On Thursday 09 February 2012 13:37:15 Jason Markley wrote: >> >> please don't top post, and keep the mailing list in cc >> >>> I agree any proposal would need to be accompanied by good reasoning. >>> I'm hones

Re: [U-Boot] Does U-boot support ASLR?

On Thursday 09 February 2012 14:28:07 Scott Wood wrote: > On 02/09/2012 12:58 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Thursday 09 February 2012 13:37:15 Jason Markley wrote: > >> I agree any proposal would need to be accompanied by good reasoning. > >> I'm honestly a little confused as to why a generally

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] common/image.c: align usage of fdt_high with initrd_high

Hi Shawn, On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Shawn Guo wrote: > Hi Simon, > > Thanks for looking at the patch. > > On 9 February 2012 09:37, Simon Glass wrote: > ... >>>   fdt_high     - if set this restricts the maximum address that the >>>                  flattened device tree will be copied in

Re: [U-Boot] Does U-boot support ASLR?

On 02/09/2012 12:58 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thursday 09 February 2012 13:37:15 Jason Markley wrote: > > please don't top post, and keep the mailing list in cc > >> I agree any proposal would need to be accompanied by good reasoning. >> I'm honestly a little confused as to why a generally a

Re: [U-Boot] Does U-boot support ASLR?

On Thursday 09 February 2012 13:37:15 Jason Markley wrote: please don't top post, and keep the mailing list in cc > I agree any proposal would need to be accompanied by good reasoning. > I'm honestly a little confused as to why a generally accepted security > feature such as ASLR would NOT be use

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] common/image.c: align usage of fdt_high with initrd_high

Hi Simon, Thanks for looking at the patch. On 9 February 2012 09:37, Simon Glass wrote: ... >>   fdt_high     - if set this restricts the maximum address that the >>                  flattened device tree will be copied into upon boot. >> +                 For example, if you have a system with

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Add option to disable code relocation

Hi Graeme, On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Graeme Russ wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > >> Also make sure that the I-Cache is on as early as possible. Relocation >> is done with the d-cache off so is slow. Takes about 40ms for me from > > Have a close l

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] net/eth.c: fix eth_write_hwaddr() to use dev->enetaddr as fall back

Hi Dirk, On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Dirk Behme wrote: > On 23.01.2012 17:17, Simon Glass wrote: >> >> Hi Dirk, >> >> >> On Jan 23, 2012 12:30 AM, "Dirk Behme" > > wrote: >>  > >>  > On 23.01.2012 08:31, Simon Glass wrote: >>  >> >>  >> Hi, >>  >> >>  >> On Th

[U-Boot] [PATCH] UBIFS: Improve error message when reading superblock failed

In addition to the error message also display the error code. I had the problem that my malloc memory was not enough (ENOMEM), and if u-boot had displayed the error code immediately that would have saved me some debugging. Signed-off-by: Bernhard Walle --- fs/ubifs/super.c |2 +- 1 files cha

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/7] tegra: Add I2C driver

Hi Yen, On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Yen Lin wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 15:26 -0800, Simon Glass wrote: >> > >> > Why isn't Yen's S-o-b line here, since he's listed as the patch author >> > in git? >> >> It will work if he replies to this thread or the new patch that I sent >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] common/image.c: align usage of fdt_high with initrd_high

Hi Shawn, On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Shawn Guo wrote: > The commit message of a28afca (Add uboot "fdt_high" enviroment variable) > states that fdt_high behaves similarly to the existing initrd_high. > But fdt_high actually has an outstanding difference from initrd_high. > The former specifi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/9] tegra: Add I2C driver and associated parts

Heiko, > -Original Message- > From: Heiko Schocher [mailto:h...@denx.de] > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 12:02 AM > To: Simon Glass > Cc: U-Boot Mailing List; linux-te...@vger.kernel.org; Tom Warren > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/9] tegra: Add I2C driver and associated > parts >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] common/image.c: align usage of fdt_high with initrd_high

Hi Stefan, On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:39 AM, Stefano Babic wrote: > On 10/01/2012 08:54, Shawn Guo wrote: >> The commit message of a28afca (Add uboot "fdt_high" enviroment variable) >> states that fdt_high behaves similarly to the existing initrd_high. >> But fdt_high actually has an outstanding di

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] SMDK5250: Add ethernet support

On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 3:26 AM, Chander Kashyap wrote: > This patch enable support for SMC911X based ethernet device. > > Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap Acked-by: Simon Glass > --- > Changes in v2: >        - As Simon pointed smc9115_pre_init() is moved inside >          in board_eth_init() in

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/5] mx53loco: Use gpio_direction_input prior to gpio_get_value

On 08/02/2012 13:34, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Use gpio_direction_input prior to gpio_get_value. > > Cc: Jason Liu > Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam > --- Applied to u-boot-imx, thanks. Best regards, Stefano Babic -- = DENX Softwa

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5] mx51evk: Use gpio_direction_input prior to gpio_get_value

On 08/02/2012 13:34, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Use gpio_direction_input prior to gpio_get_value. > > Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam > --- Applied to u-boot-imx, thanks. Best regards, Stefano Babic -- = DENX Software Engineering Gm

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5] mx53evk: Use gpio_direction_input prior to gpio_get_value

On 08/02/2012 13:34, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Use gpio_direction_input prior to gpio_get_value. > > Cc: Jason Liu > Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam > --- Applied to u-boot-imx, thanks. Best regards, Stefano Babic -- = DENX Softwa

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5] mx53smd: Use gpio_direction_input prior to gpio_get_value

On 08/02/2012 13:34, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Use gpio_direction_input prior to gpio_get_value. > > Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam > --- Applied to u-boot-imx, thanks. Best regards, Stefano Babic -- = DENX Software Engineering Gm

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] mx53ard: Use gpio_direction_input prior to gpio_get_value

On 08/02/2012 13:34, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Use gpio_direction_input prior to gpio_get_value. > > Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam > --- Applied to u-boot-imx, thanks. Best regards, Stefano Babic -- = DENX Software Engineering

Re: [U-Boot] Does U-boot support ASLR?

On Thursday 09 February 2012 10:13:29 Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Jason wrote: > > Curious if there is any built-in support for ASLR (address space layout > > randomization) in U-bootdoes anybody know the level of support for > > such things? > > No it does not, and there are no plans to support su

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] davinci: cleanup davinci_sync_env_enetaddr() fucntion

On Thursday 09 February 2012 07:16:21 Hadli, Manjunath wrote: > On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 09:48:55, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Wednesday 08 February 2012 06:14:35 Manjunath Hadli wrote: > > > - debug("### Setting environment from EEPROM MAC address = " > > > + printf("### Setting en

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] SMDK5250: Add ethernet support

Acked-by: Mike Frysinger -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] Does U-boot support ASLR?

Dear Jason, In message <4f33dc75.4040...@ggsg.cisco.com> you wrote: > Curious if there is any built-in support for ASLR (address space layout > randomization) in U-bootdoes anybody know the level of support for > such things? No it does not, and there are no plans to support such a thing. Al

[U-Boot] Does U-boot support ASLR?

Curious if there is any built-in support for ASLR (address space layout randomization) in U-bootdoes anybody know the level of support for such things? -Jason ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] Skipping relocation RAM to RAM, esp. on i.MX6?

On Thursday 09 February 2012 05:14 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Aneesh V, In message<4f33614d.8020...@ti.com> you wrote: What exactly are you talking about here that "was adding a considerable delay" - the memory copy ? Are you really sure about that? I didn't measure it part by part, bu

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] EXYNOS: SMDK5250: Add support for DDR3 memory.

Dear Hatim, On 8 February 2012 17:14, Hatim Ali wrote: > SMDK5250 development boards have different memory variants like > DDR3, LPDDR2 and LPDDR3. This patch adds supports for DDR3. > The DDR3 is configured for 667Mhz and is being enabled by default. > > This patch is based on Chander Kashyap's

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] davinci: cleanup davinci_sync_env_enetaddr() fucntion

Mike, On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 09:48:55, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Wednesday 08 February 2012 06:14:35 Manjunath Hadli wrote: > > - debug("### Setting environment from EEPROM MAC address = " > > + printf("### Setting environment from EEPROM MAC address = " > > i don't think th

Re: [U-Boot] Skipping relocation RAM to RAM, esp. on i.MX6?

Dear Aneesh V, In message <4f33614d.8020...@ti.com> you wrote: > > > What exactly are you talking about here that "was adding a > > considerable delay" - the memory copy ? Are you really sure about > > that? > > I didn't measure it part by part, but removing relocation gave a > noticeable speed-

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] SMDK5250: Add ethernet support

This patch enable support for SMC911X based ethernet device. Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap --- Changes in v2: - As Simon pointed smc9115_pre_init() is moved inside in board_eth_init() in smc911x_initialize - Removed CONFIG_ETHADDR and CONFIG_NET_MULTI defines. board/s

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] SMDK5250: Add ethernet support

Hi Mike, On 24 January 2012 23:39, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tuesday 24 January 2012 08:03:20 Chander Kashyap wrote: >> --- a/include/configs/smdk5250.h >> +++ b/include/configs/smdk5250.h >> >> +#define CONFIG_NET_MULTI > > dead define -> delete thanks for pointing out. I will remove it. > >> +

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] SMDK5250: Add ethernet support

Hi Simon, On 24 January 2012 21:49, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Chander, > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 5:03 AM, Chander Kashyap > wrote: >> This patch enable support for SMC911X based ethernet device. >> >> Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap >> --- >>  board/samsung/smdk5250/smdk5250.c |   89 >> +++

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: Convert spear3xx and spear6xx boards to boards.cfg

On Thursday 09 February 2012 11:25:33 Amit Virdi wrote: > Signed-off-by: Amit Virdi I have the same patch sitting in my queue. So, Acked-by: Stefan Roese Thanks, Stefan -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: Convert spear3xx and spear6xx boards to boards.cfg

Signed-off-by: Amit Virdi --- Makefile |8 boards.cfg |4 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index 0438f1e..1cee57f 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -655,14 +655,6 @@ ucname = $(shell echo $(1) | sed -e 's/\(.*\)_

[U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-cfi-flash

Hi Wolfgang, please pull the following patches: The following changes since commit 137703b811502dfea364650fb3e17f20b4c21333: overo: add SPL support (2012-01-16 08:40:13 +0100) are available in the git repository at: git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-cfi-flash.git master for you to fetch change

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] add STM29F400BB to table of supported legacy flashs

On Monday 06 February 2012 09:42:54 David Müller (ELSOFT AG) wrote: > Signed-off-by: David Mueller Applied to u-boot-cfi-flash. Thanks. Best regards, Stefan -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, G

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] * Fix: watchdog timed out, if flash blank (0xFF) blocks

On Friday 27 January 2012 09:29:53 Jens Scharsig (BuS Elektronik) wrote: > The current implementation of cfi_flash uses udelay to reset watchdog. > If several blocks are blank (0xff filled) the watchdog timed out. > The reason is, udelay is never called, if flash device is ready to fast. > > e.g.

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 2/4] OMAP3+: fix issues with Thumb build

Hi Albert, On Tuesday 07 February 2012 02:36 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Le 06/02/2012 12:37, Aneesh V a écrit : When U-Boot/SPL is built using the Thumb instruction set the toolchain has a potential issue with weakly linked symbols. If a function has a weakly linked default implementation in C a

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] usb/ehci: Add USB support for the MX6Q

Currently, only USB Host 1 is supported. Cc: Remy Bohmer Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Grandegger --- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/clock.c | 13 ++ arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/clock.h|1 + arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/imx-regs.h |3 + drivers/usb/host/Makefile|

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/2] mx6qsabrelite: add and enable USB Host 1 support

Cc: Stefano Babic Cc: Jason Liu Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Grandegger --- board/freescale/mx6qsabrelite/mx6qsabrelite.c | 18 ++ include/configs/mx6qsabrelite.h | 13 + 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/board/freescale/mx6

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/2] usb/mx6q: USB EHCI support for MX6Q boards

v1 was bad, sorry. v2 fixes various issues reported by Dirk and Fabio. The patches are based on head of Stefano's "u-boot-imx" tree. Wolfgang Wolfgang Grandegger (2): usb/ehci: Add USB support for the MX6Q mx6qsabrelite: add and enable USB Host 1 support arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/clock.c

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] mx6qsabrelite: add and enable USB Host 1 support

Hi Dirk, On 02/09/2012 08:18 AM, Dirk Behme wrote: > Hi Wolfgang, > > On 08.02.2012 16:23, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: >> Cc: Stefano Babic >> Cc: Jason Liu >> Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Grandegger >> --- >> board/freescale/mx6qsabrelite/mx6qsabrelite.c | 12 >> include/configs/mx6