Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 12/15] bootstage: Replace show_boot_progress/error() with bootstage_...()

2012-03-20 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Wolfgang, On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 1:34 AM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote: Dear Simon Glass, In message 1329177081-29496-13-git-send-email-...@chromium.org you wrote: These calls should not be made directly any more, since bootstage will call the show_boot_...() functions as needed.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5] mx6: Read silicon revision from register

2012-03-20 Thread Stefano Babic
On 19/03/2012 23:07, Fabio Estevam wrote: Instead of hardcoding the mx6 silicon revision, read it in run-time. Also, besides the silicon version print the mx6 variant type: quad,dual/solo or solo-lite. Tested on a mx6qsabrelite, where it shows: CPU: Freescale i.MX6Q rev1.0 at 792 MHz

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] USB: ehci-mx6: Add proper IO accessors

2012-03-20 Thread Stefano Babic
On 19/03/2012 23:36, Fabio Estevam wrote: Add proper IO accessors for mx6 usb registers. Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com --- This patch depends on [PATCH v5] mx6: Read silicon revision from register drivers/usb/host/ehci-mx6.c | 13 - 1 files

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mx53ard: Initialize return code with error

2012-03-20 Thread Stefano Babic
On 20/03/2012 00:41, Fabio Estevam wrote: The variable rc is the return of board_eth_init() function. Initialize it with an error code, so that this function can return an error when CONFIG_SMC911X is not set. Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com ---

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] add new board nas62x0

2012-03-20 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Luka Perkov, Hi Marek, On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 04:50:52PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: +#define IB62x0_OE_LOW(~(0)) +#define IB62x0_OE_HIGH (~(0)) Fix this constant please (0x) and remove those parenthesis ... btw OE_HIGH and

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] USB: ehci-mx6: Add proper IO accessors

2012-03-20 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Stefano Babic, On 19/03/2012 23:36, Fabio Estevam wrote: Add proper IO accessors for mx6 usb registers. Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com --- This patch depends on [PATCH v5] mx6: Read silicon revision from register drivers/usb/host/ehci-mx6.c |

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/9] ARM926EJS: Implement cache operations

2012-03-20 Thread Stefano Babic
On 16/03/2012 05:33, Marek Vasut wrote: Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de Cc: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de --- arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/cache.c | 66 --- 1 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] i.MX28: Make the stabilization delays shorter

2012-03-20 Thread Stefano Babic
On 31/01/2012 01:05, Marek Vasut wrote: Cut down the VDDIO/VDDA regulator stabilization delays to 500 uS. That should be enough according to the datasheet and bootlets. Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com Cc: Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de Cc: Detlev Zundel d...@denx.de Cc:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] i.MX28: Drop __naked function from spl_mem_init

2012-03-20 Thread Stefano Babic
On 16/03/2012 22:32, Marek Vasut wrote: Instead of compiling the function and using the result as a constant, simply use the constant. NOTE: This patch works around bug: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52546 Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de Cc: Stefano Babic

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mxs_spi: Return proper timeout error

2012-03-20 Thread Stefano Babic
On 19/03/2012 04:23, Fabio Estevam wrote: Instead of returning -1, it is preferred to return -ETIMEDOUT in case of timeouts. Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com --- Applied to u-boot-imx, thanks Best regards, Stefano Babic --

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] add new board nas62x0

2012-03-20 Thread DrEagle
Hi Luka, Le 19/03/2012 16:50, Marek Vasut a écrit : Dear Luka Perkov, Hi Marek, On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 04:15:53PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: + * Copyright (C) 2011 G??rald Kerma drea...@doukki.net Can you please fix your name here? I think your mail agent is not displaying UTF8

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] i.MX28: Drop __naked function from spl_mem_init

2012-03-20 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Stefano Babic, On 16/03/2012 22:32, Marek Vasut wrote: Instead of compiling the function and using the result as a constant, simply use the constant. NOTE: This patch works around bug: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52546 Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] add new board nas62x0

2012-03-20 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear DrEagle, Hi Luka, Le 19/03/2012 16:50, Marek Vasut a écrit : Dear Luka Perkov, Hi Marek, On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 04:15:53PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: + * Copyright (C) 2011 G??rald Kerma drea...@doukki.net Can you please fix your name here? I think your mail agent

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] i.MX28: Drop __naked function from spl_mem_init

2012-03-20 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Stefano, In message 4f683862.4030...@denx.de you wrote: + /* The following is subs pc, r14, #4, used as return from DABT. */ + const uint32_t data_abort_memdetect_handler = 0xe25ef004; ... Are we maybe becoming warning addicted ? I know the reason for this (GCC raises a warning

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] i.MX28: Drop __naked function from spl_mem_init

2012-03-20 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Wolfgang Denk, Dear Stefano, In message 4f683862.4030...@denx.de you wrote: + /* The following is subs pc, r14, #4, used as return from DABT. */ + const uint32_t data_abort_memdetect_handler = 0xe25ef004; ... Are we maybe becoming warning addicted ? I know the reason for

[U-Boot] [PATCH] include/mmc.h: remove struct mmc_csd

2012-03-20 Thread Andreas Bießmann
From: Andreas Bießmann biessm...@corscience.de The outdated struct mmc_csd was only used by old atmel_mci driver which was removed in c9abb4260c30fbfd51bb2cd551e7426e2ae15b66. Signed-off-by: Andreas Bießmann biessm...@corscience.de cc: Andy Fleming aflem...@freescale.com --- include/mmc.h |

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] i.MX28: Drop __naked function from spl_mem_init

2012-03-20 Thread Stefano Babic
On 20/03/2012 09:39, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Stefano, Hi Wolfgang, Yes, we should fix warnings. If you run a MAKEALL and can be sure that any message printed is a new problem you will not miss it, and act as needed. If youy know that a build will pop up a number or warnings, it's

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] i.MX28: Drop __naked function from spl_mem_init

2012-03-20 Thread Stefano Babic
On 20/03/2012 10:09, Marek Vasut wrote: In which way is this self-modifying code? I don't think so. Because it rewrites piece of RAM, which is then called in the Data abort context. Exactly My understanding is that to avoid the warning we can either use this pre-compiled constant

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] i.MX28: Drop __naked function from spl_mem_init

2012-03-20 Thread Stefano Babic
On 16/03/2012 22:32, Marek Vasut wrote: Instead of compiling the function and using the result as a constant, simply use the constant. NOTE: This patch works around bug: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52546 Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de Cc: Stefano Babic

[U-Boot] LAN9514 on Beagleboard

2012-03-20 Thread Maximilian Schwerin
Hi, could someone with a beagleboard xm please tell me if the LAN9514 works correctly? We've built two clones, that have the LAN9514 attached via the TPS65950 and I get register write errors when trying to set the MAC address. The linux drivers don't have this problem, so it's probably not a

Re: [U-Boot] Building uboot image for panda board

2012-03-20 Thread mr894381
Hi Aneesh Can you show me where to get the new version uboot code for panda ICS ? Thanks. Charles On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Aneesh V ane...@ti.com wrote: Hi Charles, On Thursday 08 March 2012 04:48 PM, charlesKAO wrote: Hi i am charles. I am building the panda uboot image, but

Re: [U-Boot] LAN9514 on Beagleboard

2012-03-20 Thread Peter Meerwald
Hello, could someone with a beagleboard xm please tell me if the LAN9514 works correctly? We've built two clones, that have the LAN9514 attached via the TPS65950 and I get register write errors when trying to set the MAC address. The linux drivers don't have this problem, so it's probably not

[U-Boot] TI DM3730 - NAND

2012-03-20 Thread Prashant Shah
Hi, Is there any guide on configuring NAND device with u-boot ? I am trying to configure u-boot to detect the NAND device Samsung K9GAG08UOE - 16GBits connected to TI DM3730 - GPMC controller. Regards. ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de

[U-Boot] [PATCH v6] mx6: Read silicon revision from register

2012-03-20 Thread Fabio Estevam
Instead of hardcoding the mx6 silicon revision, read it in run-time. Also, besides the silicon version print the mx6 variant type: quad,dual/solo or solo-lite. Tested on a mx6qsabrelite, where it shows: CPU: Freescale i.MX6Q rev1.0 at 792 MHz Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v6] mx6: Read silicon revision from register

2012-03-20 Thread Stefano Babic
On 20/03/2012 15:21, Fabio Estevam wrote: Instead of hardcoding the mx6 silicon revision, read it in run-time. Also, besides the silicon version print the mx6 variant type: quad,dual/solo or solo-lite. Tested on a mx6qsabrelite, where it shows: CPU: Freescale i.MX6Q rev1.0 at 792 MHz

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v6] mx6: Read silicon revision from register

2012-03-20 Thread Eric Nelson
On 03/20/2012 07:21 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote: Instead of hardcoding the mx6 silicon revision, read it in run-time. Also, besides the silicon version print the mx6 variant type: quad,dual/solo or solo-lite. Tested on a mx6qsabrelite, where it shows: CPU: Freescale i.MX6Q rev1.0 at 792 MHz

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] i.MX28: Drop __naked function from spl_mem_init

2012-03-20 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Marek Vasut, In message 201203201009.43717.ma...@denx.de you wrote: + const uint32_t data_abort_memdetect_handler = 0xe25ef004; ... Because it rewrites piece of RAM, which is then called in the Data abort context. This is a mere implementation detail. You could use a pointer

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc/83xx: increment malloc heap size for the MPC832x MDS boards

2012-03-20 Thread Scott Wood
On 03/18/2012 04:07 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Tabi Timur-B04825, In message CAOZdJXUem_-mgDSqF+p4R0npZQ6qu14G1yexQCBUe2G=nr2...@mail.gmail.com you wrote: Doubling it is kind of aggressive strategy. You know exactly how much free room needs to be guaranteed, so why don't you

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc/83xx: increment malloc heap size for the MPC832x MDS boards

2012-03-20 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Scott Wood, In message 4f68cf30.8000...@freescale.com you wrote: Make your code more robust. The robust thing to do would be to not be stingy with the malloc size, and change all boards to have at least 1 MiB for malloc (except ones with very small amounts of RAM). Maybe have a

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/5] Revert Add board_pre_console_putc to deal with early console output

2012-03-20 Thread Stephen Warren
On 03/19/2012 10:59 PM, Simon Glass wrote: This reverts commit 295d3942b806552503243f5cfb36aec6f1b5a9bf. It turns that this really doesn't work very nicely. Instead we should have a pre-console panic function so that we know that further execution is impossible and we don't need to worry

[U-Boot] [PATCH] tegra: Specify debugging serial port at boot.

2012-03-20 Thread Stephen Warren
This works together with a kernel change that looks at the scratchpad register to determine which of the many UARTs it should use for early printing: http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg154633.html Note that this configuration only affects the kernel's decompressor and earlyprintk code.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] tegra: Specify debugging serial port at boot.

2012-03-20 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Stephen, On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote: This works together with a kernel change that looks at the scratchpad register to determine which of the many UARTs it should use for early printing:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V4] MAKEALL: Add -m/-M option to determine maintainers

2012-03-20 Thread Marek Vasut
The -m option tries to find the board in MAINTAINERS file and figure out the email. The -M option lists boards including their maintainers emails and all affiliated emails. There are multiple strategies used to retrieve these emails: 1) Check board/boardname with git log and use three most

[U-Boot] [RESEND] ca9x4_ct_vxp build error

2012-03-20 Thread Marek Vasut
As my previous remark about this board not building was ignored, I'm resending it one more time. I'll do one more resend of this note and if noone fixes this I'll submit a removal patch. $ CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabi- ARCH=arm ./MAKEALL ca9x4_ct_vxp Configuring for ca9x4_ct_vxp board...

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] tegra: Specify debugging serial port at boot.

2012-03-20 Thread Stephen Warren
On 03/20/2012 02:13 PM, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Stephen, On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote: This works together with a kernel change that looks at the scratchpad register to determine which of the many UARTs it should use for early printing:

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/5] pmic: Add support for the Dialog DA9053 PMIC

2012-03-20 Thread Fabio Estevam
Add support for the Dialog DA9053 PMIC. Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com --- drivers/misc/Makefile |1 + drivers/misc/pmic_dialog.c | 37 + include/dialog_pmic.h | 187 3 files changed, 225

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5] mx5: Add clock config interface

2012-03-20 Thread Fabio Estevam
mx5: Add clock config interface Add clock config interface support, so that we can configure CPU or DDR clock in the later init Signed-off-by: Jason Liu jason@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Eric Miao eric.m...@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com ---

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] imx-common: Factor out get_ahb_clk()

2012-03-20 Thread Fabio Estevam
get_ahb_clk() is a common function between mx5 and mx6. Place it into imx-common directory. Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com --- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/imx-common/cpu.c| 23 arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx5/clock.c | 17

[U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5] mx53loco: Add support for 1GHz operation for DA9053-based boards

2012-03-20 Thread Fabio Estevam
There are two types of mx53loco boards: initial boards were built with a Dialog DA9053 PMIC and more recent version is based on a Freescale MC34708 PMIC. Add DA9053 PMIC support and adjust the required voltages and clocks for running the CPU at 1GHz. Tested on both versions of mx53loco boards.

[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5] mx53loco: Allow to print CPU information at a later stage

2012-03-20 Thread Fabio Estevam
Print CPU information within board_late_init(). This is in preparation for adding 1GHz support, which requires programming a PMIC via I2C. As I2C is only available after relocation, print the CPU information later at board_late_init(), so that the CPU frequency can be printed correctly.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] Add board_panic_no_console() to deal with early critical errors

2012-03-20 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi Simon, On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: This patch adds support for console output in the event of a panic() before the console is inited. The main purpose of this is to deal with a very early panic() which would otherwise cause a silent hang. A new

[U-Boot] [PATCH] README.mx28: add

2012-03-20 Thread Otavio Salvador
This is mainline a copy of README.m28 changing the references to the mx28 counterpart but it makes easy for people looking for information about mx28 based boards. Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br Cc: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com --- doc/README.mx28 | 224

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] README.mx28: add

2012-03-20 Thread Fabio Estevam
Hi Otavio, On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote: This is mainline a copy of README.m28 changing the references to the mx28 counterpart but it makes easy for people looking for information about mx28 based boards. Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] Add board_panic_no_console() to deal with early critical errors

2012-03-20 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Graeme, On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Simon, On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: This patch adds support for console output in the event of a panic() before the console is inited. The main purpose of this is

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] tegra: Specify debugging serial port at boot.

2012-03-20 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi Stephen, Simon, On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote: On 03/20/2012 02:13 PM, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Stephen, On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote: This works together with a kernel change that looks at the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] tegra: Specify debugging serial port at boot.

2012-03-20 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Stephen, On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote: On 03/20/2012 02:13 PM, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Stephen, On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote: This works together with a kernel change that looks at the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] tegra: Specify debugging serial port at boot.

2012-03-20 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Graeme, On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Stephen, Simon, On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote: On 03/20/2012 02:13 PM, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Stephen, On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Stephen Warren

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] Add board_panic_no_console() to deal with early critical errors

2012-03-20 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi Simon, On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: Hi Graeme, On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Simon, OK, so what about in panic():  - If gd-have_console is not set:    o call the board specific

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] tegra: Specify debugging serial port at boot.

2012-03-20 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi Simon, On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: Hi Graeme, On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Stephen, Simon, On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote: On 03/20/2012 02:13 PM,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] tegra: Specify debugging serial port at boot.

2012-03-20 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Graeme, On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Simon, On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: Hi Graeme, On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Stephen, Simon, On Wed, Mar 21,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] Add board_panic_no_console() to deal with early critical errors

2012-03-20 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Graeme, On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Simon, On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: Hi Graeme, On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Simon, OK, so what about in

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] tegra: Specify debugging serial port at boot.

2012-03-20 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi Simon, On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: Hi Graeme, On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Simon, On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: We cannot select the UART via CONFIG -

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] tegra: Specify debugging serial port at boot.

2012-03-20 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Graeme, On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Simon, On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: Hi Graeme, On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Simon, On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] Add board_panic_no_console() to deal with early critical errors

2012-03-20 Thread Stephen Warren
On 03/20/2012 05:22 PM, Simon Glass wrote: On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote: ... OK, so what about in panic(): - If gd-have_console is not set: o call the board specific setup_panic_uarts() o call print_pre_console_buffer() passing panic_putc()

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] Add board_panic_no_console() to deal with early critical errors

2012-03-20 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Stephen, On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote: On 03/20/2012 05:22 PM, Simon Glass wrote: On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote: ... OK, so what about in panic():  - If gd-have_console is not set:    o call the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] tegra: Specify debugging serial port at boot.

2012-03-20 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi Simon On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: Hi Graeme, On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Simon, And we are talking about one board vendor taking a SoC and using UARTA for the panic output and another board

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] tegra: Specify debugging serial port at boot.

2012-03-20 Thread Stephen Warren
On 03/20/2012 05:33 PM, Simon Glass wrote: ... We cannot select the UART via CONFIG - remember that all of these boards have the same U-Boot binary. Please read that again :-) The device tree is the only thing that distinguishes them. All of the CONFIG options are identical for all boards. I

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] tegra: Specify debugging serial port at boot.

2012-03-20 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Graeme, On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Simon On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: Hi Graeme, On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Simon, And we are talking about one

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] tegra: Specify debugging serial port at boot.

2012-03-20 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi Stehpen, On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: Hi Graeme, On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Simon On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: Hi Graeme, On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 5:17

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] tegra: Specify debugging serial port at boot.

2012-03-20 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Stephen, On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote: On 03/20/2012 05:33 PM, Simon Glass wrote: ... We cannot select the UART via CONFIG - remember that all of these boards have the same U-Boot binary. Please read that again :-) The device tree is the only

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] README.mx28: add

2012-03-20 Thread Otavio Salvador
This is mainline a copy of README.m28 changing the references to the mx28 counterpart but it makes easy for people looking for information about mx28 based boards. Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br Cc: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com --- doc/README.mx28 | 152

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/5] Revert Add board_pre_console_putc to deal with early console output

2012-03-20 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Wolfgang, On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote: On 03/19/2012 10:59 PM, Simon Glass wrote: This reverts commit 295d3942b806552503243f5cfb36aec6f1b5a9bf. It turns that this really doesn't work very nicely. Instead we should have a pre-console panic

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3 v3] sandbox: new SPI flash driver

2012-03-20 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Mike, On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Thursday 15 March 2012 00:09:59 Simon Glass wrote: On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: +/* Used to quickly bulk erase backing store */ +static u8 sb_sf_0xff[0x1]; Ick, Does it

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v6] mx6: Read silicon revision from register

2012-03-20 Thread Liu Hui-R64343
-Original Message- From: Stefano Babic [mailto:sba...@denx.de] Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 10:35 PM To: Estevam Fabio-R49496 Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; sba...@denx.de; eric.nel...@boundarydevices.com; dirk.be...@de.bosch.com; Liu Hui- R64343 Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] mx6: Read silicon

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sh_spi: Add 4 chip select signals supporting

2012-03-20 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Applied. Thanks, Nobuhiro 2012/3/6 Shimoda, Yoshihiro yoshihiro.shimoda...@renesas.com: The module has 4 chip select signals. This patch supports it. Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda yoshihiro.shimoda...@renesas.com ---  drivers/spi/sh_spi.c |   19 ---  drivers/spi/sh_spi.h

[U-Boot] powerpc/85xx:debugger support patch

2012-03-20 Thread Prabhakar Kushwaha
This series of patches include 4 parts to overcome the limitation of e500 and e500v2 processor to support any debugger. 1. doc:Add documentation for e500 external debugger support 2. powerpc/85xx:Fix MSR[DE] bit in MSR to support debugger 3. powerpc/85xx:Make debug exception vector accessible

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4][v2] doc:Add documentation for e500 external debugger support

2012-03-20 Thread Prabhakar Kushwaha
This describes requirement of e500 and e500v2 processor to support external debugger. It also provide an insight of the configuration switch required and their description. Signed-off-by: Radu Lazarescu radu.lazare...@freescale.com Signed-off-by: Marius Grigoras marius.grigo...@freescale.com

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4][v2] powerpc/85xx:Make debug exception vector accessible

2012-03-20 Thread Prabhakar Kushwaha
Debugging of e500 and e500v1 processer requires debug exception vecter (IVPR + IVOR15) to have valid and fetchable OP code. While executing in translated space (AS=1), whenever a debug exception is generated, the MSR[DS/IS] gets cleared i.e. AS=0 and the processor tries to fetch an instruction

[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] powerpc/85xx:Fix NAND code base to support debugger

2012-03-20 Thread Prabhakar Kushwaha
Update NAND code base to ovecome e500 and e500v2's second limitation i.e. IVPR + IVOR15 should be valid fetchable OP code address. As NAND SPL does not compile vector table so making sure IVOR + IVOR15 points to any fetchable valid data Signed-off-by: Radu Lazarescu radu.lazare...@freescale.com

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4][v2] powerpc/85xx:Fix MSR[DE] bit in MSR to support debugger

2012-03-20 Thread Prabhakar Kushwaha
Debugging of e500 and e500v1 processer requires MSR[DE] bit to be set always. Where MSR = Machine State register Make sure of MSR[DE] bit is set uniformaly across the different execution address space i.e. AS0 and AS1. Signed-off-by: Radu Lazarescu radu.lazare...@freescale.com Signed-off-by:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] add new board nas62x0

2012-03-20 Thread Luka Perkov
Hi Marek, On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 07:48:05AM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: +#define CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT /* disable board lowlevel_init */ Are you sure you want to skip lowlevel init? It'll break cache setup etc. I believe. I will retest and send v4 once I

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4] add new board nas62x0

2012-03-20 Thread Luka Perkov
Add support for new boards RaidSonic ICY BOX NAS6210 and NAS6220. Only difference between boards is number of SATA ports. Signed-off-by: Luka Perkov ub...@lukaperkov.net Signed-off-by: Gerald Kerma drea...@doukki.net --- Changes from version v3: * don't use utf8 for Geralds name * don't mix