[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 5/7] MAINTAINERS: Add Tetsuyuki Kobayshi for kzm9g

2012-07-16 Thread Tetsuyuki Kobayshi
From: Tetsuyuki Kobayashi Signed-off-by: Tetsuyuki Kobayashi --- Changes for v2: - New Changes for v3: - No change Changes for v4: - No change MAINTAINERS |1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 45446f4..55a6c1b 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 7/7] arm: rmobile: kzm9g: enable reset command

2012-07-16 Thread Tetsuyuki Kobayshi
From: Tetsuyuki Kobayashi Do soft power on reset in U-Boot reset command. Signed-off-by: Tetsuyuki Kobayashi --- Changes for v4: - New arch/arm/include/asm/arch-rmobile/sh73a0.h |4 board/kmc/kzm9g/kzm9g.c|2 ++ 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 6/7] arm: rmobile: kzm9g: Modify bus controller setting for CS4

2012-07-16 Thread Tetsuyuki Kobayshi
From: Tetsuyuki Kobayashi Problem: Linux kernel hangs up when it write a file to NFS mounted directory. Solution: Modify bus controller setting for CS4, which connected smsc9221 ethernet controller. Detail: Modify CS4BCR bit[29:28] (IWW[1:0]) from 00 to 01. Modify CS4BCR bit[20:19] (IWRRD[1:0])

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 3/7] arm: rmobile: kzm9g: change prompt to board specific

2012-07-16 Thread Tetsuyuki Kobayshi
From: Tetsuyuki Kobayashi Change U-Boot prompt to board specific one. Signed-off-by: Tetsuyuki Kobayashi Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu --- Changes for v2: - No change. Just rebased. Changes for v3: - No change. Changes for v4: - No change. include/configs/kzm9g.h |2 +- 1 file chan

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 4/7] arm: rmobile: kzm9g: Add dummy member to struct sh73a0_rwdt

2012-07-16 Thread Tetsuyuki Kobayshi
From: Tetsuyuki Kobayashi Add dummy member to struct sh73a0_rwdt in sh73a0.h. Without this, initializing watch dog timer goes wrong. Signed-off-by: Tetsuyuki Kobayashi --- Changes for v2: - New Changes for v3: - No change Changes for v4: - No change arch/arm/include/asm/arch-rmobile/sh73a0

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 2/7] arm: rmobile: kzm9g: Adjust low level hardware setting

2012-07-16 Thread Tetsuyuki Kobayshi
From: Tetsuyuki Kobayashi Adjust low level hardware setting in s_init. Signed-off-by: Tetsuyuki Kobayashi Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu --- Changes for v2: - No change. Just rebased. Changes for v3: - No change. Changes for v4: - No change. arch/arm/include/asm/arch-rmobile/sh73a0.h |

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/7] arm: rmobile: kzm9g: Modify sdram area

2012-07-16 Thread Tetsuyuki Kobayshi
From: Tetsuyuki Kobayashi Reserve first 16MB for RT-CPU (as same as kernel config). Signed-off-by: Tetsuyuki Kobayashi Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu --- Changes for v2: - No change. Just rebased. Changes for v3: - No change. Changes for v4: - No change. include/configs/kzm9g.h |5 +

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 0/7] arm: rmobile: kzm9g: enable booting Linux kernel

2012-07-16 Thread Tetsuyuki Kobayshi
From: Tetsuyuki Kobayashi Hi, Iwamatsu-san This is v4 patch set for kzm9g. I modified bus controller setting for CS4. And enabled reset command. Tetsuyuki Kobayashi (7): arm: rmobile: kzm9g: Modify sdram area arm: rmobile: kzm9g: Adjust low level hardware setting arm: rmobile: kzm9g: ch

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] video: support exynos fimd driver for various exynos series

2012-07-16 Thread Minkyu Kang
Dear Donghwa, On 2 July 2012 11:22, Donghwa Lee wrote: > This patch supports exynos fimd driver for various exynos series different > from > existing it supports only exynos4 chip. > > Signed-off-by: Donghwa Lee > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park > --- > arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/fb.h |

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-nios/master

2012-07-16 Thread Thomas Chou
On 04/24/2012 09:38 AM, thomas wrote: The following changes since commit 61ddce07f8b96c5df7d00466b4da9edaecb0eff1: sandbox: Use the new run_command() (2012-04-23 22:53:54 +0200) are available in the git repository at: git://git.denx.de/u-boot-nios.git master Thomas Chou (1): nios2

[U-Boot] [PATCH u-boot-arm/next v2 1/1] OMAP3: igep00x0: add SPL support for IGEP-based boards

2012-07-16 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
This patch adds SPL support for IGEP-based boards. Tested on an IGEPv2 Rev.C board with Micron NAND Flash memory. Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas --- Changes since v1: - CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE should be 54 * 1024 instead of 45 * 1024 as suggested by Tom Rini board/isee/igep0020/config.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH u-boot-arm/next 1/2] OMAP3: igep00x0: Add config option to choose flash storage memory

2012-07-16 Thread Tom Rini
On 07/16/2012 04:41 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: [snip] > Runtime detection is possible reading the sysboot as you said (in fact > this is how we do it in the kernel) but as Tom said I didn't find a > common way to do this. I guess you can manually detect the NAND type > and configure the G

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH u-boot-arm/next 1/2] OMAP3: igep00x0: Add config option to choose flash storage memory

2012-07-16 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On 07/16/2012 12:43 AM, Enric Balletbò i Serra wrote: > > [snip] >> I would like to investigateif we can do this using runtime detection >> instead of a separate config option. Give me some days. The runtime >> detection can be done reading the sy

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH u-boot-arm/next 2/2] OMAP3: igep00x0: add SPL support for IGEP-based boards

2012-07-16 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On 07/13/2012 12:41 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > >> This patch adds SPL support for IGEP-based boards. >> >> Tested on an IGEPv2 Rev.C board with Micron NAND Flash memory. > [snip] >> +#define CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE (45 * 1024) > >

Re: [U-Boot] Notes from the U-Boot BOF Meeting in Geneva 2012/07/12

2012-07-16 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi Detlev, On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Detlev Zundel wrote: > > * Conflict resolution: setting up a moderator procedure for > unhappy submitters > > A recent occurence on the mailing list where contributers were sent > through multiple rounds of patch submissions for non-obvious reasons w

[U-Boot] [PATCH v7 12/15] tegra20: enable SPL for tegra20 boards

2012-07-16 Thread Allen Martin
Add SPL options to tegra20 config files and enable SPL build for tegra20 boards. Also remove redundant code from u-boot that is not contained in SPL. Signed-off-by: Allen Martin Acked-by: Stephen Warren Tested-by: Thierry Reding --- Makefile |9 ++ arch/arm/cp

[U-Boot] [PATCH v7 03/15] tegra20: rename CONFIG_MACH_TEGRA_GENERIC

2012-07-16 Thread Allen Martin
Rename CONFIG_MACH_TEGRA_GENERIC to the less confusing CONFIG_TEGRA. The meaning of the config options is now: CONFIG_TEGRA - Any tegra chip CONFIG_TEGRA20 - A tegra20 family chip CONFIG_TEGRA30 - A tegra30 family chip (not added yet) Signed-off-by: Allen Martin Acked-by: Stephen Warren Tested-

[U-Boot] [PATCH v7 09/15] ARM: add tegra20 support to arm720t

2012-07-16 Thread Allen Martin
Add support for tegra20 arm7 boot processor. This processor is used to power on the Cortex A9 and transfer control to it. In tegra this processor is an ARM7TDMI not an ARM720T, but since we don't use cache it was easier to just reuse the ARM720T code as the processors are otherwise identical exce

[U-Boot] [PATCH v7 10/15] tegra20: add u-boot-*-tegra.bin targets

2012-07-16 Thread Allen Martin
Add target for tegra20 u-boot image. This is a concatenation of tegra spl and normal u-boot binaries. For non-devicetree builds this is named "u-boot-nodtb-tegra.bin" for devicetree builds is named "u-boot-dtb-tegra.bin". Signed-off-by: Allen Martin Acked-by: Stephen Warren Tested-by: Thierry

[U-Boot] [PATCH v7 05/15] tegra20: make board mkdir commands unconditional

2012-07-16 Thread Allen Martin
Change the mkdir commands for the object directories to be unconditional. This fixes an issue when building for SPL where SRCTREE and OBJTREE are the same, but $(obj) is under SPLTREE. Signed-off-by: Allen Martin Acked-by: Stephen Warren Tested-by: Thierry Reding --- board/avionic-design/medc

[U-Boot] [PATCH v7 08/15] tegra20: remove timer_init from SPL build

2012-07-16 Thread Allen Martin
Don't use timer_init from tegra board.c. This comes out of arm720t for the SPL build. Signed-off-by: Allen Martin Acked-by: Stephen Warren Tested-by: Thierry Reding --- board/nvidia/common/board.c |2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/board/nvidia/common/board.c b/board/nvi

[U-Boot] [PATCH v7 02/15] tegra20: move tegra20 SoC code to arch/arm/cpu/tegra20-common

2012-07-16 Thread Allen Martin
In preparation for splitting out the armv4t code from tegra20, move the tegra20 SoC code to arch/arm/cpu/tegra20-common. This code will be compiled armv4t for the arm7tdmi and armv7 for the cortex A9. Signed-off-by: Allen Martin Acked-by: Stephen Warren Tested-by: Thierry Reding --- Makefile

[U-Boot] [PATCH v7 14/15] spl: fix SPL build of private libgcc

2012-07-16 Thread Allen Martin
This fixes the SPL build to link with the SPL version of libgcc if USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC is set to "yes". Previously it was linking with the libgcc from the normal u-boot build because it gets set in PLATFORM_LIBS and passed down the to the SPL build. Signed-off-by: Allen Martin Acked-by: Stephen W

[U-Boot] [PATCH v7 07/15] ARM: Fix arm720t SPL build

2012-07-16 Thread Allen Martin
Take a few SPL fixes from armv7 and apply them to arm720t: -Use dummy exception handlers for SPL build -Initialize relocation register r9 to 0 for the case of no relocation -ifdef out interrupt handler code Signed-off-by: Allen Martin Acked-by: Stephen Warren Tested-by: Thierry Reding --- arch

[U-Boot] [PATCH v7 11/15] tegra20: move SDRAM param save to later in boot

2012-07-16 Thread Allen Martin
Move warmboot_save_sdram_params() to later in the boot sequence. This code relies on devicetree to get the address of the memory controller and with upcoming changes for SPL boot it gets called early in the boot process when devicetree is not initialized yet. Signed-off-by: Allen Martin Acked-by

[U-Boot] [PATCH v7 15/15] tegra20: Remove armv4t build flags

2012-07-16 Thread Allen Martin
These flags were necessary when building tegra20 as a single binary that supported ARM7TDMI and Cortex A9. Now that the ARM7TDMI support is split into a separate SPL, this is no longer necessary. Signed-off-by: Allen Martin Acked-by: Stephen Warren Tested-by: Thierry Reding --- arch/arm/cpu/a

[U-Boot] [PATCH v7 13/15] arm: enable libgcc build for SPL

2012-07-16 Thread Allen Martin
Enable the building of private libgcc for SPL Signed-off-by: Allen Martin Acked-by: Stephen Warren Tested-by: Thierry Reding --- arch/arm/lib/Makefile |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/Makefile b/arch/arm/lib/Makefile index 39a9550..bd3b77f 100

[U-Boot] [PATCH v7 00/15] split tegra20 arm7 code into separate SPL

2012-07-16 Thread Allen Martin
This patch series fixes a long standing problem with the tegra20 u-boot build. Tegra20 contains an ARM7TDMI boot processor and a Cortex A9 main processor. Prior to this patch series this was accomplished by #ifdefing out any armv7 code from the early boot sequence and creating a single binary tha

[U-Boot] [PATCH v7 06/15] mkconfig: add support for SPL CPU

2012-07-16 Thread Allen Martin
Add support for specifying a different CPU for main u-boot and SPL u-boot builds. This is done by adding an optional SPL CPU after the main CPU in boards.cfg as follows: normal_cpu:spl_cpu This this case CPU will be set to "normal_cpu" during the main u-boot build and "spl_cpu" during the S

[U-Boot] [PATCH v7 04/15] tegra20: tec: add tegra20-common-post.h

2012-07-16 Thread Allen Martin
Add tegra20-common-post.h to be consistent with other tegra20 boards. Signed-off-by: Allen Martin Acked-by: Thierry Reding Acked-by: Stephen Warren Tested-by: Thierry Reding --- include/configs/tec.h |2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/configs/tec.h b/include/conf

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fsl: board EEPROM has the CRC in the wrong location

2012-07-16 Thread Scott Wood
On 07/16/2012 02:57 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Scott, > > In message <5000ab43.6090...@freescale.com> you wrote: >> >>> You are interpreting something which can be random data. >>> if (e.version == 0) crc_offset = 0x72; So here we're reading the 'version' field before w

Re: [U-Boot] i.MX dcache issues

2012-07-16 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Dirk Behme, > On 15.07.2012 00:08, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 11:28:03PM +0200, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote: > >> Shouldn't the MMC/eSDHC drivers flush/invalidate the dcache ranges > >> that they use > >> for DMA operations? Not doing so would explain why stack-allocated

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] i.MX28: Check if we are using a valid VBUS for power initialization

2012-07-16 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: ... >> early_delay(1000); >> - if (readl(&power_regs->hw_power_sts) & POWER_STS_VDD5V_GT_VDDIO) { >> + if (mx28_valid_vbus() && > > This is still likely to break any device that doesn't source it's 5V power > supply from USB I migh

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] i.MX28: Check if we are using a valid VBUS for power initialization

2012-07-16 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Otavio Salvador, > Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador > --- > Changes in v2: > - add comments > - fix when we have vbus OR vdd5v > - improve patch short description > > arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx28/spl_power_init.c | 26 > +++--- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 > deleti

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 1/2] i.MX28: Check if we are using a valid VBUS when initializing power

2012-07-16 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > Dear Otavio Salvador, > > [...] >> >> - if (tmp & POWER_STS_VDD5V_GT_VDDIO) { >> + if (mx28_valid_vbus() && (tmp & POWER_STS_VDD5V_GT_VDDIO)) { > > > So if the board isn't supplied by USB VBUS, this will fail now? I sen

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] i.MX28: Check if we are using a valid VBUS for power initialization

2012-07-16 Thread Otavio Salvador
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador --- Changes in v2: - add comments - fix when we have vbus OR vdd5v - improve patch short description arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx28/spl_power_init.c | 26 +++--- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ej

[U-Boot] Notes from the U-Boot BOF Meeting in Geneva 2012/07/12

2012-07-16 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi, as promised, here are my expanded notes from the BoF meeting at LSM2012 last week. It was a pleasure to get some core developers into one room at the same time and discuss controversial topics without the health of any one attendant being in jeopardy at any time, so thanks again to everybody

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 2/2] i.MX28: use a clear name for DDR2 initialization

2012-07-16 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Otavio Salvador, > The mx28 prefix has been added to the initialization data and function > so it is clear by which SoC it is used as i.MX233 will have a specific > one. > > Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador Acked-by: Marek Vasut [...] Best regards, Marek Vasut

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 1/2] i.MX28: Check if we are using a valid VBUS when initializing power

2012-07-16 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Otavio Salvador, [...] > > - if (tmp & POWER_STS_VDD5V_GT_VDDIO) { > + if (mx28_valid_vbus() && (tmp & POWER_STS_VDD5V_GT_VDDIO)) { So if the board isn't supplied by USB VBUS, this will fail now? [...] Best regards, Marek Vasut

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] i.MX28: extend print_cpuinfo() to use chip information

2012-07-16 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: >> The information now is gathered from HW_DIGCTL_CHIPID register and >> includes the chip modem and revision on the output. >> >> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador > > This one is OK with me, queue for next maybe? Fine with me. This is not urgent

[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 2/2] i.MX28: use a clear name for DDR2 initialization

2012-07-16 Thread Otavio Salvador
The mx28 prefix has been added to the initialization data and function so it is clear by which SoC it is used as i.MX233 will have a specific one. Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador --- arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx28/spl_mem_init.c | 12 ++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) d

[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 1/2] i.MX28: Check if we are using a valid VBUS when initializing power

2012-07-16 Thread Otavio Salvador
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador --- arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx28/spl_power_init.c | 21 ++--- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx28/spl_power_init.c b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx28/spl_power_init.c index 4b09b0c..c8a35af 100644 -

[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/2] i.MX28 SoC pending patches

2012-07-16 Thread Otavio Salvador
Those patches are waiting in my tree for some time and are part of my work i.MX233 support. Am trying to send small parts that are ready for merging and that do not depends on i.MX233 SoC to work. Otavio Salvador (2): i.MX28: Check if we are using a valid VBUS when initializing power i.MX28: u

Re: [U-Boot] DaVinci PHYs

2012-07-16 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Tom Rini, > On 07/16/2012 11:58 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > Dear Tom Rini, > > > >> On 07/16/2012 12:33 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote: > >>> Hello Marek, > >>> > >>> added Tom Rini to cc, as he is the ti maintainer ... > >>> > >>> On 15.07.2012 15:42, Marek Vasut wrote: > Hi guys, > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] i.MX28: extend print_cpuinfo() to use chip information

2012-07-16 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Otavio Salvador, > The information now is gathered from HW_DIGCTL_CHIPID register and > includes the chip modem and revision on the output. > > Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador This one is OK with me, queue for next maybe? Acked-by: Marek Vasut > --- > Changes in v2: > - use ?? for uniden

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fsl: board EEPROM has the CRC in the wrong location

2012-07-16 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Scott, In message <5000ab43.6090...@freescale.com> you wrote: > > > You are interpreting something which can be random data. > > > >> if (e.version == 0) > >>crc_offset = 0x72; > >> > >> So here we're reading the 'version' field before we validate the data, > >> because we need to check

Re: [U-Boot] DaVinci PHYs

2012-07-16 Thread Tom Rini
On 07/16/2012 11:58 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > Dear Tom Rini, > >> On 07/16/2012 12:33 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote: >>> Hello Marek, >>> >>> added Tom Rini to cc, as he is the ti maintainer ... >>> >>> On 15.07.2012 15:42, Marek Vasut wrote: Hi guys, is there any hope the ad-hoc implemen

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3] i.MX28: extend print_cpuinfo() to use chip information

2012-07-16 Thread Otavio Salvador
The information now is gathered from HW_DIGCTL_CHIPID register and includes the chip modem and revision on the output. Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador --- Changes in v2: - use ?? for unidentified revision and cpu type - use numeric revisions Changes in v3: - drop mx23 data as it will be posted in

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Add support for eco5-pk ARM board

2012-07-16 Thread Raphael Assenat
This patch adds support for the 8D Technologies ECO5-PK board which is based on the TI AM3505 ARM SOC. Signed-off-by: Raphael Assenat diff --git a/board/8dtech/eco5pk/Makefile b/board/8dtech/eco5pk/Makefile new file mode 100644 index 000..befe60a --- /dev/null +++ b/board/8dtech/eco5pk/Makef

Re: [U-Boot] DaVinci PHYs

2012-07-16 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Tom Rini, > On 07/16/2012 12:33 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote: > > Hello Marek, > > > > added Tom Rini to cc, as he is the ti maintainer ... > > > > On 15.07.2012 15:42, Marek Vasut wrote: > >> Hi guys, > >> > >> is there any hope the ad-hoc implementation of davinci emac PHYs will > >> ever be

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH u-boot-arm/next 2/2] OMAP3: igep00x0: add SPL support for IGEP-based boards

2012-07-16 Thread Tom Rini
On 07/13/2012 12:41 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > This patch adds SPL support for IGEP-based boards. > > Tested on an IGEPv2 Rev.C board with Micron NAND Flash memory. [snip] > +#define CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE (45 * 1024) This should be 54 * 1024. Thanks! -- Tom _

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH u-boot-arm/next 1/2] OMAP3: igep00x0: Add config option to choose flash storage memory

2012-07-16 Thread Tom Rini
On 07/16/2012 12:43 AM, Enric Balletbò i Serra wrote: [snip] > I would like to investigateif we can do this using runtime detection > instead of a separate config option. Give me some days. The runtime > detection can be done reading the sysboot configuration for example. I > think it's possible,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 12/20] arm/km: add support for external switchconfiguration

2012-07-16 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi, >> How about amending the U-Boot design principles with > > Go for it - it's a wiki. Thinking about it, I turned it not into a rule, but into a Lemma from the 10 rules: Lemmas from the golden rules 1. Generic Code is Good Code New code shall be as generic as possible and added t

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3 RESEND] MX28: SPI: Pull out the PIO transfer function

2012-07-16 Thread Stefano Babic
On 09/07/2012 12:48, Marek Vasut wrote: > Pull out all the PIO transfer logic into separate function, > so DMA can be added. > > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut > Cc: Fabio Estevam > Cc: Otavio Salvador > Cc: Stefano Babic > Cc: Wolfgang Denk > --- Applied to u-boot-imx, next branch, thanks. Bes

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3 V2] MX28: SPI: Refactor spi_xfer a bit

2012-07-16 Thread Stefano Babic
On 09/07/2012 12:48, Marek Vasut wrote: > This makes it easier to adapt for addition of DMA support. > > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut > Cc: Fabio Estevam > Cc: Otavio Salvador > Cc: Stefano Babic > Cc: Wolfgang Denk > --- Applied to u-boot-imx, next branch, thanks. Best regards, Stefano Babic

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3 V2] MX28: SPI: Add DMA transfer support

2012-07-16 Thread Stefano Babic
On 09/07/2012 12:48, Marek Vasut wrote: > The DMA transfers happen only if the transfered data are larger > than 512 bytes. Otherwise PIO is used. This is a small speed > optimization. > > The DMA transfer doesn't work if unaligned transfer is requested > due to the limitation of the DMA controlle

Re: [U-Boot] DaVinci PHYs

2012-07-16 Thread Tom Rini
On 07/16/2012 12:33 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote: > Hello Marek, > > added Tom Rini to cc, as he is the ti maintainer ... > > On 15.07.2012 15:42, Marek Vasut wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> is there any hope the ad-hoc implementation of davinci emac PHYs will >> ever be >> flipped to phylib ? > > I curren

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/2] mxs: generalize code for print_cpuinfo()

2012-07-16 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Stefano Babic wrote: > On 30/06/2012 17:07, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> The information now is gathered from HW_DIGCTL_CHIPID register and >> includes the revision of the chip on the output. > > could you take a look and rebase it ? It does not apply anymore - thanks

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/4] Board support and feature for LaCie devices

2012-07-16 Thread Simon Guinot
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 01:16:49AM +0200, Simon Guinot wrote: > Changes for v2: > - Move board support and feature into a separate patch set. > - Move mach-types update into a separate patch. > > Simon Guinot (4): > lacie_kw: add support for EFI partitions > ARM: add netspace_mini_v2 to mach

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 3/8] ehci-hcd.c, musb_core, usb.h: Add USB_DMA_MINALIGN define for cache alignment

2012-07-16 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Ilya Yanok, > Dear Marek, > > ok, I finally managed to fix it. Will post the patches in a few seconds. So the link I sent you was true afterall ? :) What was the problem? I'll pick the patches for -next though, unless we're 100% definitelly sure they won't break anything else. > Regards,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/2] mxs: generalize code for print_cpuinfo()

2012-07-16 Thread Stefano Babic
On 30/06/2012 17:07, Otavio Salvador wrote: > The information now is gathered from HW_DIGCTL_CHIPID register and > includes the revision of the chip on the output. > > Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador > Cc: Marek Vasut > Cc: Stefano Babic > Cc: Fabio Estevam > > --- Hi Otavio, could you take

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] imx: Use a clear identification of an unidentified CPU type

2012-07-16 Thread Stefano Babic
On 30/06/2012 17:07, Otavio Salvador wrote: > In case an unidentified CPU type is detected it now returns > i.MX??, in a const char. > > Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador > Cc: Marek Vasut > Cc: Stefano Babic > Cc: Fabio Estevam > > --- Applied to u-boot-imx, next branch, thanks. Best regards,

[U-Boot] [PATCH] kirkwood: add support for Iomega iConnect board

2012-07-16 Thread Luka Perkov
Add support for new board iConnect from Iomega. More information about the device can be found here: http://go.iomega.com/en/products/network-storage-desktop/wireless-data-station/network-hard-drive-iconnect/?partner=4735 Signed-off-by: Luka Perkov Tested-by: Wojciech Dubowik Tested-by: Tim Fl

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] mxc_i2c: remove setting speed at each start

2012-07-16 Thread Stefano Babic
On 13/07/2012 12:38, Marek Vasut wrote: > Dear Dirk Behme, > > [...] > >>> Ok, everything was already clear, and I can also add my: >>> >>> Acked-by: Stefano Babic >> >> Same for this one: Is this applied anywhere? It doesn't seem to be part >> of v2012.07-rc1? >> >> Best regards > > Stefano, o

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/4] mmc: Support designWare Controller

2012-07-16 Thread Minkyu Kang
Dear Andy, On 9 July 2012 11:45, Jaehoon Chung wrote: > Hi Andy, > > Could you merge these series? > If you don't mind, could we merge this at u-boot-samsung? > To use the exynos5, must enable the DesignWare Controller for eMMC. > > Best Regards, > Jaehoon Chung > > On 07/03/2012 04:57 PM, Jaehoo

[U-Boot] Uboot and initramfs

2012-07-16 Thread Wojtek
Hi, I'm struggling with the topic for long two days and I want to ask for help. I have a DNS-320 system with u-boot. I compiled kernel and it works well, but I need initramfs. I prepared contents on this system (ARM) (no need to cross-compile), then did: find . -print0 | cpio --null -ov --fo

[U-Boot] [PATCH V2a 3/8] ehci-hcd.c, musb_core, usb.h: Add USB_DMA_MINALIGN define for cache alignment

2012-07-16 Thread Ilya Yanok
From: Tom Rini The USB spec says that 32 bytes is the minimum required alignment. However on some platforms we have a larger minimum requirement for cache coherency. In those cases, use that value rather than the USB spec minimum. We add a cpp check to to define USB_DMA_MINALIGN and make use o

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ehci-hcd: program asynclistaddr before every transfer

2012-07-16 Thread Ilya Yanok
Move or_asynclistaddr programming to ehci_submit_async() function to make sure queue head is properly programmed before every transfer. This solves the problem with changing qh address. Also remove unneeded qh_list->qh_link reprogramming at the end of transfer. Signed-off-by: Ilya Yanok --- dri

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 3/8] ehci-hcd.c, musb_core, usb.h: Add USB_DMA_MINALIGN define for cache alignment

2012-07-16 Thread Ilya Yanok
Dear Marek, ok, I finally managed to fix it. Will post the patches in a few seconds. Regards, Ilya. ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] DaVinci PHYs

2012-07-16 Thread Heiko Schocher
Hello Marek, added Tom Rini to cc, as he is the ti maintainer ... On 15.07.2012 15:42, Marek Vasut wrote: Hi guys, is there any hope the ad-hoc implementation of davinci emac PHYs will ever be flipped to phylib ? I currently have no such job in sight ... bye, Heiko -- DENX Software Engineer

Re: [U-Boot] USB on mx53

2012-07-16 Thread Stefano Babic
On 16/07/2012 08:26, Andreas Salvisberg wrote: > Dear Mr. Babic > > Hi, please use the U-Boot ML for U-Boot related questions. You will find much more help than asking to a single person and your questions can interest many other people. > > I try to run a USB Host on a i.MX53 Board. Unfortu