Hi Tom,
I've re-worded this as:
common/image.c: Fix regression with ramdisk load/entry points in FIT
A FIT image with a ramdisk that sets the entry or load points to 0x0
must be treated as meaning leave in place and NOT relocate to 0x0.
This regression was introduced in a51ec63.
Hi Julius,
On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 17:30:16 -0700, Julius Werner
jwer...@chromium.org wrote:
The existing USB configuration parsing code relies on the descriptors'
own length values when reading through the configuration blob. Since the
size of those descriptors is always well-defined, we should
Dear Tom,
Please apply this patch to u-boot directly.
I wish that this fix will be merged before release.
On 13 July 2013 02:08, Lukasz Majewski l.majew...@samsung.com wrote:
Provide proper setting for the APLL fout frequency calculation for
Exynos4 based targets (especially Exynos4210 -
Am 12/07/2013 23:24, schrieb Tom Rini:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 03:09:23PM +0200, Stefano Babic wrote:
Booting a FIT image containing a ramdisk,
the ramdisk is loaded at address 0x0 that causes
bus errors for architectures that do not have
RAM starting at address zero.
Signed-off-by:
Fix the following warning:
mpc8323erdb.c: In function 'mac_read_from_eeprom':
mpc8323erdb.c:198:3: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break
strict-aliasing rules [-Wstrict-aliasing]
if (crc32(crc, buf, 24) == *(unsigned int *)buf[24]) {
^
Size remains unchanged after and
Hi,
Am 2013-07-11 15:54, schrieb Justin Waters:
Justin Waters (6):
am335x_evm: Make NAND support modular
am335x_evm: Add command line editing
am335x_evm: Rework bootcmd to handle two MMC devs
Add additional MLO images to .gitignore
am335x_evm: Add support for eMMC environment
Dear Tom Rini,
In message 20130712212416.GV13531@bill-the-cat you wrote:
A FIT image with a ramdisk that sets the entry or load points to 0x0
must be treated as meaning leave in place and NOT relocate to 0x0.
Why is this the case? 0x0 could be a valid address on some systems.
If we need a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/13/2013 07:21 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Tom Rini,
In message 20130712212416.GV13531@bill-the-cat you wrote:
A FIT image with a ramdisk that sets the entry or load points to
0x0 must be treated as meaning leave in place and NOT
On 07/13/2013 05:21 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Tom Rini,
In message 20130712212416.GV13531@bill-the-cat you wrote:
A FIT image with a ramdisk that sets the entry or load points to 0x0
must be treated as meaning leave in place and NOT relocate to 0x0.
Why is this the case? 0x0 could
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/13/2013 10:26 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 07/13/2013 05:21 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Tom Rini,
In message 20130712212416.GV13531@bill-the-cat you wrote:
A FIT image with a ramdisk that sets the entry or load points
to 0x0 must be
10 matches
Mail list logo
