i have a current production version of the beaglebone black, and i'd
dearly love to NFS mount the root filesystem over the USB tether
(which typically assigns net addresses of 192.68.7.[12] to the
host/board).
does u-boot support that? i just found this elinux article:
http://elinux.org/Moun
On Sun, 21 Jul 2013, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> On Sun, 21 Jul 2013 04:07:17 -0700 (PDT), "Robert P. J. Day"
> wrote:
>
> >
> > i have a current production version of the beaglebone black, and i'd
> > dearly love to NFS mount the root filesystem over the USB tether
> > (which typica
On Sun, 21 Jul 2013, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> On Sun, 21 Jul 2013 08:10:15 -0700 (PDT), "Robert P. J. Day"
> wrote:
> > p.s. just to be clear, when the BBB is up and running, the only
> > active network interface is:
> >
> > usb0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr EA:60:E8:F4:F4:BD
>
On Sun, 21 Jul 2013, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> On Sun, 21 Jul 2013 08:10:15 -0700 (PDT), "Robert P. J. Day"
> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 21 Jul 2013, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Robert,
> > >
> > > On Sun, 21 Jul 2013 04:07:17 -0700 (PDT), "Robert P. J. Day"
> > > wrote:
> > >
> >
This commit removes duplicated code for UART IP block embedded at Samsung
SoCs.
New ./include/asm/samsung-common directory has been created to store
common code for existing and future Samsung targets.
Additionally building of UART code now depends on more verbose
CONFIG_S5P_SERIAL define.
For thi
On Sun, 21 Jul 2013, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 01:43:29PM -0700, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> > in the end, i would *like* the host to have the IP address
> > 192.168.7.1, and the BBB to have the IP address 192.168.7.2, and
> > there's one other slight complication.
> >
> > i ca
Hi, Albert:
>But then, why change the board's original SYS_TEXT_BASE? Could you not
>just leave boards.cfg untouched, and only change the decompressed
>target address to 0x03F8?
>
Yes, just change the decompressed target address to 0x03F8 is also
ok!
Best wishes,
Hi Andreas,
On 07/21/2013 07:02 AM, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
To answer the second question we can have a look at the specs. I can
presume by looking at the specs that we need to switch the drive
strength for the data I/O pins to higher level for this board to fix the
problem mentioned in the comm
8 matches
Mail list logo