Hello,
I am trying to add support for watchdog in one board and it is not
working as expected.
I did add the:
#define CONFIG_HW_WATCHDOG
#define CONFIG_IMX_WATCHDOG
into the board config file.
Into the board .c file, I added:
int board_late_init(void)
{
...
#ifdef CONFIG_HW_WATCHDOG
hw_w
Hi Jeroen,
On Sun, 22 Sep 2013 20:26:07 +0200, Jeroen Hofstee
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 08/24/2013 06:32 PM, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
> > 4) Keep the s_init in crt0.S or move it to the board_init_f?
> > The disadvantage of the later is that all the different
> > board_init_f's need to call system_ini
There're cases we want to use active-low LEDs and the 'inverted' logic
needs to be added. This includes it using the STATUS_LED_INVERT macro.
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
---
Changes in v2:
- rework to keep calling __led_init
doc/README.LED| 2 ++
drivers/misc/status_led.c | 22 +
The modelist data uses the list definition but the 'list.h' header
were not being included. The build failure is bellow:
,
| In file included from .c:16:0:
| .../u-boot/include/linux/fb.h:503:19: error: field 'modelist' has incomplete
type
| struct list_head modelist; /* mode list */
|
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
---
Changes in v2:
- new patch
drivers/misc/status_led.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/misc/status_led.c b/drivers/misc/status_led.c
index 6b71ad4..33148c9 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/status_led.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/st
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
---
Changes in v2: None
doc/README.JFFS2_NAND | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/doc/README.JFFS2_NAND b/doc/README.JFFS2_NAND
index 5018ae8..09788d5 100644
--- a/doc/README.JFFS2_NAND
+++ b/doc/README.JFFS2_NAND
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
JF
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
---
Changes in v2: None
common/cmd_led.c | 27 ---
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common/cmd_led.c b/common/cmd_led.c
index c48603c..d541f2f 100644
--- a/common/cmd_led.c
+++ b/common/cmd_led.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7
The part_validate comment had a wrong description of the actions it
does and referenced to non-existent functions while in fact it calls
'part_validate_eraseblock()'.
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
---
Changes in v2:
- rework commit log (Eric Benard)
common/cmd_mtdparts.c | 8
1 file c
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Benoît Thébaudeau
> wrote:
>> Dear Otavio Salvador,
>>
>> On Saturday, September 28, 2013 5:24:17 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>> There're cases we want to use active-low LEDs and the 'inverted' logic
>>> nee
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Eric Bénard wrote:
>
>> Maybe the real fix would be to check why gpio_get_value doesn't return
>> the level of the gpio when it's configured as an output.
>
> I agree with Eric.
>
> Could you please test the
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> From: Fabio Estevam
>
> When the GPIO is configured as an output, we should return the value from the
> DR
> register.
>
> This implements the same fix as in the following kernel commit from FSL BSP:
> http://git.freescale.com/git/cgit.cgi/
python used in buildman doesn't need to be placed in
/usr/bin/python, So use env to ensure that the interpreter
will pick the python from environment.
Usefull with several versions of python's installed on system.
Signed-off-by: Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki
---
tools/buildman/buildman.py | 2 +-
Can any one encounter this! looks like some issue on python setup?
$ ./tools/buildman/buildman -b master
File "./tools/buildman/buildman", line 42
print result
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
Let me know for any input, I am using Python 3.3.0
--
Thanks,
Jagan.
Jagann
From: Fabio Estevam
When the GPIO is configured as an output, we should return the value from the DR
register.
This implements the same fix as in the following kernel commit from FSL BSP:
http://git.freescale.com/git/cgit.cgi/imx/linux-2.6-imx.git/commit/arch/arm/plat-mxc/gpio.c?h=imx_3.0.35_4.1
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Benoît Thébaudeau
wrote:
> Dear Otavio Salvador,
>
> On Saturday, September 28, 2013 5:24:17 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> There're cases we want to use active-low LEDs and the 'inverted' logic
>> needs to be added. This includes it using the STATUS_LED_INVERT mac
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Otavio Salvador
wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
Please provide a commit log and explain which function from list.h is
needed and/or what is the build error you get without this header.
___
U-Boot mailing list
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Eric Bénard wrote:
> Maybe the real fix would be to check why gpio_get_value doesn't return
> the level of the gpio when it's configured as an output.
I agree with Eric.
Could you please test the patch below?
--- a/drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/mx
Dear Otavio Salvador,
On Saturday, September 28, 2013 5:24:17 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> There're cases we want to use active-low LEDs and the 'inverted' logic
> needs to be added. This includes it using the STATUS_LED_INVERT macro.
There is already a STATUS_LED_ACTIVE definition (though not on
Hi Otavio,
Le Sat, 28 Sep 2013 00:24:16 -0300,
Otavio Salvador a écrit :
> The GPIO need to be set as input before reading its current value and
> set back to output for setting it; this fixes the non-working
> 'led toggle' for GPIO based LEDs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
> ---
> driv
Hi Otavio,
Le Sat, 28 Sep 2013 00:24:12 -0300,
Otavio Salvador a écrit :
> The part_validate comment had a wrong description of the actions it
> does and referenced to non-existent functions while in fact it calls
> 'part_validate_eraseblock()'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
> ---
> comm
than uImage"
(i already tossed the original post so i can't reply to it directly,
sorry.)
this recent patch by tom rini to make zImage rather than uImage the
default kernel format for am335x_evm:
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2013-September/163365.html
seems flawed as the loading wi
21 matches
Mail list logo
