[U-Boot] pull request: u-boot-uniphier/master

Hi Tom, Please pull some more UniPhier updates for v2016.09-rc3. Thanks! The following changes since commit da968c7bfa4cc1203a4f9f61a97f55c85dfbb3b6: Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-i2c (2016-08-26 07:42:06 -0400) are available in the git repository at:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: uniphier: support system reset functionality for PSCI

2016-08-25 21:03 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada : > This supports the system reset via PSCI for ARMv7 SoCs. > > Because the system reset is not supported on PSCI 0.1, let's define > CONFIG_ARMV7_PSCI_1_0. (it is supported since PSCI 0.2, but there > is no CONFIG to enable

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/3] ARM: uniphier: some more fixes for v2016.09

2016-08-25 17:02 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada : > > > > Masahiro Yamada (3): > ARM: uniphier: display revision of Micro Support Card 3.6.x kindly > ARM: uniphier: increase CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN for sLD3 > ARM: dts: uniphier: add u-boot,dm-pre-reloc to use eMMC

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: uniphier: change UNIPHIER_SERIAL to default y option

2016-08-25 19:00 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada : > This is very likely to be necessary for normal use cases. > Set its default to 'y' for shorter defconfig files. > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada Applied to u-boot-uniphier/master. --

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/5] mmc: uniphier: migrate to CONFIG_DM_MMC_OPS and CONFIG_BLK

2016-08-25 14:52 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada : > > > > Masahiro Yamada (5): > mmc: uniphier-sd: migrate to CONFIG_DM_MMC_OPS > mmc: uniphier-sd: move uniphier_sd_init() below > mmc: uniphier-sd: return error code if unsupported width is given > mmc:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mmc: uniphier-sd: add static qualifiers to probe and remove callbacks

2016-08-12 19:19 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada : > They are both only referenced in this file. > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada > --- Applied to u-boot-uniphier/master. -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada

[U-Boot] [RFC] mmc: fsl_esdhc: fix misaligned cache operation warning

When using gzwrite to eMMC on an i.MX6Q board, the following warning occurs repeatedly: CACHE: Misaligned operation at range [4fd63318, 4fe63318] I tried to cache-line align the start and end parameter for flush_dcache_range in esdhc_setup_data. (Same approach as in

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/4] config: rk3399: add support for dwc3 gadget

Hi Kever, On Aug 23, 2016 20:48, "Kever Yang" wrote: > > To support fastboot, we need to enable the controller first. > rk3399 is using dwc3 as usb device controller, this patch enable > the configs for dwc3 gadget. > > Signed-off-by: Kever Yang

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Kconfig: update FASTBOOT_FLASH_MMC_DEV

handle FASTBOOT_FLASH_MMC_DEV default properly Signed-off-by: Steve Rae --- I was hoping that the FASTBOOT_FLASH_MMC_DEV Kconfig option could be an integer (eg. 0, 1, or 2 etc.) or undefined (to signify that it is not being used). However, it seems that (Kconfig experts

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] Disable SPL_MMC_SUPPORT if ROCKCHIP_SPL_BACK_TO_BROM is enabled.

Default SPL_MMC_SUPPORT to false when ROCKCHIP_SPL_BACK_TO_BROM is enabled. Signed-off-by: Sandy Patterson --- Changes in v2: - Rebase after "Kconfig: Move CONFIG_SPL_..._SUPPORT to Kconfig." - Remove all the refactoring in the configs. - Split enabling featuring

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/2] With this change the SPL binary shrinks from 32k to 23k when

ROCKCHIP_SPL_BACK_TO_BROM is enabled. This has been tested on the rock2 board. It should work with any rk3288 though since the bootrom is loading the SPL already it should load the main U-Boot as well. Rock2 has been tested with ROCKCHIP_SPL_BACK_TO_BROM. Also, this moves around the images on

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/2] Enable ROCKCHIP_SPL_BACK_TO_BROM for rock2 board

Rock2 has been tested with back to brom feature. The tricky part is that with this feature the default environment is inside u-boot, and it's defined for every rk3288 board independetly. So I just changed it for rock2 here. Solve by moving environment after u-boot before 1M boundary

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] RK3288 needs fdt and initrd below 256M now.

On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Sandy, > > On 11 July 2016 at 11:38, Sandy Patterson > wrote: > > I am not sure why this limit is changing. But my kernel > > doesn't load when it's above 256. This was testing on the > >

Re: [U-Boot] u-boot - raspberry pi

Thanks for the response. We like what you do with u-boot, we believe it is a better solution. We've reviewed the PI netboot project and have come to the conclusion that even with modifications it will not provide the flexibility of u-boot, due to the proprietary nature of the PI firmware.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5] rk_pwm: use clock framework API to get module clock

On 12 August 2016 at 11:21, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Kever, > > On 12 August 2016 at 03:57, Kever Yang wrote: >> This patch use clock API instead of hardcode for get pwm clock. >> >> Signed-off-by: Kever Yang >> --- >> >>

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] RK3288 needs fdt and initrd below 256M now.

Hi Sandy, On 11 July 2016 at 11:38, Sandy Patterson wrote: > I am not sure why this limit is changing. But my kernel > doesn't load when it's above 256. This was testing on the > rock2 board. > > Signed-off-by: Sandy Patterson > --- > >

Re: [U-Boot] [RESEND PATCH v2 3/5] config: evb-rk3399: enable pinctrl driver

On 16 August 2016 at 03:58, Kever Yang wrote: > This patch enable rk3399 pinctrl driver and gpio driver which is sub-node > of pinctrl. > > Signed-off-by: Kever Yang > Acked-by: Simon Glass > --- > > Changes in v2: None >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5] rk3288: add arch_cpu_init for rk3288

On 15 August 2016 at 22:50, Simon Glass wrote: > On 12 August 2016 at 03:58, Kever Yang wrote: >> >> We do some SoC level one time setting initialization in >> arch_cpu_init. >> >> Signed-off-by: Kever Yang >> --- >> >>

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] rockchip: use dummy byte only enable OF_PLATDATA

On 12 August 2016 at 11:20, Simon Glass wrote: > On 12 August 2016 at 01:43, Ziyuan Xu wrote: >> Add a condition to determine the rk3288_sdram_channel size. >> >> This patch fixes read sdram_channel property failed from DT on rk3288 >> boards, which not

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5] rk_pwm: remove grf setting code from driver

On 12 August 2016 at 11:21, Simon Glass wrote: > On 12 August 2016 at 03:58, Kever Yang wrote: >> We consider the grf setting for pwm controller select as the system >> operation instead of driver operation, move it to soc init, let's >> remove it

Re: [U-Boot] [RESEND PATCH v2 2/5] pinctrl: add driver for rk3399

Hi, On 16 August 2016 at 22:15, Simon Glass wrote: > On 16 August 2016 at 03:58, Kever Yang wrote: >> >> This patch add pinctrl driver for rk3399. >> >> Signed-off-by: Kever Yang >> --- >> >> Changes in v2: >> - move and

Re: [U-Boot] [RESEND PATCH v2 4/5] rk3399: enable the pwm2/3 pinctrl in board init

On 16 August 2016 at 03:58, Kever Yang wrote: > There is no interrupt line for each PWM which used by pinctrl to get the > periph_id, so it's not able to enable the default pinctrl setting by pinctrl > framework, let's enable it at board_init(). > > Signed-off-by: Kever

Re: [U-Boot] [RESEND PATCH v2 5/5] dts: rk3399: add pinctrl for sdmmc

On 16 August 2016 at 03:58, Kever Yang wrote: > This patch add pinctrl for sdcard which may not be initialized before > uboot. > > Signed-off-by: Kever Yang > Acked-by: Simon Glass > --- > > Changes in v2: None > >

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] rockchip: rk3288: skip lowlevel_init process

On 27 August 2016 at 07:53, Ziyuan Xu wrote: > lowlevel_init() is never needed for rk3288, so drop it. > > Signed-off-by: Ziyuan Xu > > --- > > arch/arm/mach-rockchip/board.c| 4 > arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3288-board-spl.c | 4

Re: [U-Boot] [RESEND PATCH v2 1/5] rk3399: syscon: add support for pmugrf

On 16 August 2016 at 03:58, Kever Yang wrote: > pmugrf is a module like grf which contain some of the iomux registers > and other registers. > > Signed-off-by: Kever Yang > Acked-by: Simon Glass > --- > > Changes in v2:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] README: add cmd directory description

On 26 August 2016 at 05:54, Ziyuan Xu wrote: > All of the command files have moved to cmd directory, add description to > Directory Hierarchy. > > Signed-off-by: Ziyuan Xu > --- > > README | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) Reviewed-by: Simon

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] sunxi: display: Use PWM to drive backlight where applicable

Hi Hans, On 26 August 2016 at 08:21, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > > On 26-08-16 16:15, Peter Korsgaard wrote: >>> >>> "Hans" == Hans de Goede writes: >> >> >> > When the backlight's pwm input is connected to a pwm output of the SoC, >> >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] rockchip: rk3288-firefly: enable boot from eMMC

Hi, On 12 August 2016 at 11:20, Simon Glass wrote: > On 9 August 2016 at 19:56, Jacob Chen wrote: >> Add eMMC dt node and define fallback boot devices. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jacob Chen >> --- >> >>

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 22/30] dtoc: Add methods for reading data from properties

On 25 July 2016 at 18:59, Simon Glass wrote: > Provide easy helpers for reading integer, string and boolean values from > device-tree properties. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass > --- > > tools/dtoc/fdt_util.py | 25 + > 1 file

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 19/30] dtoc: Support packing the device tree

On 25 July 2016 at 18:59, Simon Glass wrote: > After any node/property deletion the device tree can be packed to remove > spare space. Add a way to perform this operation. > > Note that for fdt_fallback, fdtput automatically packs the device tree after > deletion, so no action

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] rockchip: Disable SPL_MMC_SUPPORT if ROCKCHIP_SPL_BACK_TO_BROM is enabled.

Hi Sandy, On 25 August 2016 at 06:05, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Sandy, > > On 24 August 2016 at 15:00, Sandy Patterson wrote: >> >> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Sandy Patterson >> wrote: [...] >>> >>> Hi Simon, >>>

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 21/30] dtoc: Correct quotes in fdt_util

On 25 July 2016 at 18:59, Simon Glass wrote: > The style is to use single quotes for strings where possible. Adjust this > function. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass > --- > > tools/dtoc/fdt_util.py | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 20/30] dtoc: Support finding the offset of a property

On 25 July 2016 at 18:59, Simon Glass wrote: > Add a way to find the byte offset of a property within the device tree. This > is only supported with the normal libfdt implementation since fdtget does > not provide this information. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 18/30] dtoc: Support deleting device tree properties

On 25 July 2016 at 18:59, Simon Glass wrote: > Add support for deleting a device tree property. With the fallback > implementation this uses fdtput. With libfdt it uses the API call and > updates the offsets afterwards. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass > --- >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 15/30] dtoc: Drop the convert_dash parameter to GetProps()

On 25 July 2016 at 18:59, Simon Glass wrote: > This is not used anywhere in dtoc, so drop it. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass > --- > > tools/dtoc/fdt_fallback.py | 5 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) Applied to u-boot-dm/next.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 17/30] dtoc: Move to using bytearray

On 25 July 2016 at 18:59, Simon Glass wrote: > Since we want to be able to change the in-memory device tree using libfdt, > use a bytearray instead of a string. This makes interfacing from Python > easier. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass > --- > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 16/30] dtoc: Prepare for supporting changing of device trees

On 25 July 2016 at 18:59, Simon Glass wrote: > For binman we need to support deleting properties in the device tree. This > will change the offsets of nodes after the deletion. In preparation, add > code to keep track of when the offsets are invalid, and regenerate them. > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 13/30] patman: Add a library to handle logging and progress

On 25 July 2016 at 18:59, Simon Glass wrote: > When tools want to display information of varying levels of importance, it > helps to provide the user with control over the verbosity of these messages. > Progress messages work best if they are displayed and then removed from the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 14/30] dtoc: Allow the device tree to be compiled from source

On 25 July 2016 at 18:59, Simon Glass wrote: > If a source device tree is provide to the Fdt() constructors, compile it > automatically. This will be used in tests, where we want to build a > particular test .dts file and check that it works correctly in binman. > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 09/30] dtoc: Move BytesToValue() and GetEmpty() into PropBase

On 25 July 2016 at 18:59, Simon Glass wrote: > These functions are currently in a separate fdt_util file. Since they are > only used from PropBase and subclasses, it makes sense for them to be in the > PropBase class. > > Move these functions into fdt.py along with the list of

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 10/30] dtoc: Move Widen() and GetPhandle() into the base class

On 25 July 2016 at 18:59, Simon Glass wrote: > These functions are identical in both subclasses. Move them into the base > class. > > Note: In fact there is a bug in one version, which was fixed by this patch: > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/651697/ > > Signed-off-by:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 11/30] dtoc: Move a few more common functions into fdt.py

On 25 July 2016 at 18:59, Simon Glass wrote: > Some functions have the same code in the subclasses. Move these into the > superclass to avoid duplication. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass > --- > > tools/dtoc/fdt.py | 57 >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 12/30] patman: Add a tools library for using temporary files

On 25 July 2016 at 18:59, Simon Glass wrote: > For tools which want to use input files and temporary output, it is useful > to have the handling of these dealt with in one place. Add a new library > which allows input files to be read, and output files to be written, all >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 08/30] dtoc: Create a base class for Fdt

On 25 July 2016 at 18:59, Simon Glass wrote: > At present we have two separate implementations of the Fdt library, one which > uses fdtget/fdtput and one which uses libfdt (via swig). > > Before adding more functionality it makes sense to create a base class for > these. This

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 07/30] dtoc: Rename fdt.py to fdt_normal.py

On 25 July 2016 at 18:59, Simon Glass wrote: > In preparation for creating an Fdt base class, rename this file to indicate > it is the normal Fdt implementation. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass > --- > > tools/dtoc/{fdt.py => fdt_normal.py} | 0 >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 06/30] dtoc: Move the fdt library selection into fdt_select

On 25 July 2016 at 18:59, Simon Glass wrote: > Rather than have dtc worry about which fdt library to use, move this into > a helper file. Add a function which creates a new Fdt object and scans it, > regardless of the implementation. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 05/30] dtoc: Move the struct import into the correct order

On 25 July 2016 at 18:59, Simon Glass wrote: > This should be in with the other system includes. Move it. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass > --- > > tools/dtoc/dtoc.py | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) Applied to u-boot-dm/next.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 04/30] patman: Adjust command.Output() to raise an error by default

On 25 July 2016 at 18:59, Simon Glass wrote: > It is more useful to have this method raise an error when something goes > wrong. Make this the default and adjust the few callers that don't want to > use it this way. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass > --- > >

[U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-rockchip

Hi Tom, The following changes since commit da968c7bfa4cc1203a4f9f61a97f55c85dfbb3b6: Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-i2c (2016-08-26 07:42:06 -0400) are available in the git repository at: git://git.denx.de/u-boot-rockchip.git for you to fetch changes up to

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/30] binman: A tool for creating firmware images

Hi, On 25 July 2016 at 18:58, Simon Glass wrote: > This series introduces binman, a tool designed to create firmware images. > It provides a way to bring together various binaries and place them in an > image, at particular positions and with configurable alignment. > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3 v2] Sandbox: document support of block device emulation

On 11 August 2016 at 14:52, Stefan Brüns wrote: > Signed-off-by: Stefan Brüns > Acked-by: Simon Glass > --- > board/sandbox/README.sandbox | 19 +++ > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) Applied to

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3 v2] sandbox: Add "host size" hostfs command for fs test

On 11 August 2016 at 14:52, Stefan Brüns wrote: > This complements the size/fatsize/ext4size commands added in > commit cf6598193aed5de8855eaf70c1994f2bc437255a > load, save and ls are already implemented for hostfs, now tests can > cover the same operations on

[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] rockchip: rk3288: skip lowlevel_init process

lowlevel_init() is never needed for rk3288, so drop it. Signed-off-by: Ziyuan Xu --- arch/arm/mach-rockchip/board.c| 4 arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3288-board-spl.c | 4 include/configs/rk3288_common.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 1 insertion(+),

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] TI: Rework SRAM definitions and maximums

On Friday 26 August 2016 11:00 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On all TI platforms the ROM defines a "downloaded image" area at or near > the start of SRAM which is followed by a reserved area. As it is at > best bad form and at worst possibly harmful in corner cases to write in > this reserved area, we

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] TI: Rework SRAM definitions and maximums

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On all TI platforms the ROM defines a "downloaded image" area at or near > the start of SRAM which is followed by a reserved area. As it is at > best bad form and at worst possibly harmful in corner cases to write in > this

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 8/8] armv8: ls1046ardb: Add LS1046ARDB board support

> -Original Message- > From: Gong Qianyu [mailto:qianyu.g...@nxp.com] > Sent: Friday, August 26, 2016 6:29 AM > To: u-boot@lists.denx.de; york sun > Cc: Prabhakar Kushwaha ; Mingkai Hu > ; Shaohui Xie ;

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] ARM: TI: Enable DISPLAY_{CPU/BOARD}INFO

This series adds ID code detection support for AM437x and enables CONFIG_DISPLAY_{CPU/BOARD}INFO on all TI platforms. Lokesh Vutla (2): ARM: AM437X: Add Silicon ID support configs: ti: armv7_common: Enable DISPLAY_{CPU/BOARD}INFO arch/arm/cpu/armv7/am33xx/sys_info.c | 5 -

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] configs: ti: armv7_common: Enable DISPLAY_{CPU/BOARD}INFO

Enable CONFIG_DISPLAY_{CPU/BOARD}INFO on all TI platforms. Also removing the duplicated configs. Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla --- include/configs/ti_armv7_common.h| 4 include/configs/ti_armv7_keystone2.h | 1 - include/configs/ti_omap4_common.h| 2 --

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] ARM: AM437X: Add Silicon ID support

Add silicon ID code for AM437x silicon. This can be used to print the cpu info using CONFIG_DISPLAY_CPUINFO. Also printing "CPU :" along with cpu name in order to be consistent with other OMAP platforms. Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla --- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/am33xx/sys_info.c

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] board: k2g: Enable ECC byte lane

Enable ECC byte lane for k2g-evm Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla --- arch/arm/mach-keystone/ddr3.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-keystone/ddr3.c b/arch/arm/mach-keystone/ddr3.c index 34606f4..6b92530 100644 ---

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] board: k2g: Enable ECC support

This series enables ECC support on k2g-evm. Lokesh Vutla (2): board: ks2: Enable ECC using detected DDR size board: k2g: Enable ECC byte lane arch/arm/mach-keystone/ddr3.c | 3 +-- board/ti/ks2_evm/board.c | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) -- 2.9.3

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] board: ks2: Enable ECC using detected DDR size

EEC is being enabled based on the ddr size populated by SPD data. But not all keystone platforms have SPD data to detect ddr3 size. So, enable ECC using the detected DDR size. Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla --- board/ti/ks2_evm/board.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

[U-Boot] x86: How to run UEFI BIOS + u-boot + linux on haswell/broadwell board?

Hi, I'd like to run u-boot+linux on a haswell+pch board which uses AMI UEFI BIOS. Which board in u-boot may I take as a porting template? Or if any guys with such experience, pls share with me . Any suggestion is greatly appreciated. Thank you. Best Regards!

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/8] armv8: fsl-layerscape: Increase L2 Data RAM latency and L2 Tag RAM latency

> -Original Message- > From: Gong Qianyu [mailto:qianyu.g...@nxp.com] > Sent: Friday, August 26, 2016 6:29 AM > To: u-boot@lists.denx.de; york sun > Cc: Prabhakar Kushwaha ; Mingkai Hu > ; Shaohui Xie