> -Original Message-
> From: Marek Vasut [mailto:ma...@denx.de]
> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2018 2:55 AM
> To: Ooi, Joyce ; Joe Hershberger
>
> Cc: See, Chin Liang ; Ong, Hean Loong
> ; Priyanka Jain ; u-
> b...@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] net: phy: add TSE PCS
Hi,
On 24/12/18 4:37 PM, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
> commit 4f86a724e82c0 ("power: regulator: denied disable on always-on
> regulator") throws an error when requested to disable an always-on
> regulator. It is right that an always-on regulator should not be
> attempted to be disabled. But at the same
On 12/18/18 6:02 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> See UEFI v2.7, section 3.1.2 for details of the specification.
>
> With my efishell command[1], you can try as the following:
> => efi boot add 1 SHELL ...
> => efi boot add 2 HELLO ...
> => efi boot order 1 2
> => efi bootmgr
> (starting
TFABOOT support includes:
- ls2088aqds_tfa_defconfig to be loaded by trusted firmware
- environment address and size changes for TFABOOT
Signed-off-by: Pankit Garg
Signed-off-by: Ruchika Gupta
Signed-off-by: Rajesh Bhagat
---
board/freescale/ls2080aqds/MAINTAINERS | 2 +
TFABOOT support includes:
- ls2088ardb_tfa_defconfig to be loaded by trusted firmware
- environment address and size changes for TFABOOT
- define BOOTCOMMAND for TFABOOT
- remove EL3 specific erratas for TFABOOT
Signed-off-by: Pankit Garg
Signed-off-by: Ruchika Gupta
Signed-off-by:
From: Pankit Garg
TFABOOT support includes:
- ls1088aqds_tfa_defconfig to be loaded by trusted firmware
- environment address and size changes for TFABOOT
- MC address changes for TFABOOT
- define BOOTCOMMAND for TFABOOT
- ifc chip select changes for TFABOOT
Signed-off-by: Rajesh Bhagat
From: Pankit Garg
TFABOOT support includes:
- ls1088ardb_tfa_defconfig to be loaded by trusted firmware
- environment address and size changes for TFABOOT
- MC address changes for TFABOOT
- define BOOTCOMMAND for TFABOOT
- ifc chip select changes for TFABOOT
Signed-off-by: Rajesh Bhagat
From: Pankit Garg
Signed-off-by: Pankit Garg
---
include/configs/ls1043a_common.h | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/configs/ls1043a_common.h b/include/configs/ls1043a_common.h
index 27350dfa00..49b014181e 100644
--- a/include/configs/ls1043a_common.h
+++
Restore the legacy flow along with TFABOOT flow for
IFC configuration.
Signed-off-by: Pankit Garg
Signed-off-by: Rajesh Bhagat
---
drivers/misc/fsl_ifc.c | 173 +
1 file changed, 173 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/misc/fsl_ifc.c
Fixes for TFABOOT framework
- update eMMC bootsrc to SD_MMC
- Increase buffer size for mcinitcmd from 256 to 512
- Fix mcinitcmd and bootcmd for Secure Boot
Signed-off-by: Pankit Garg
Signed-off-by: Rajesh Bhagat
---
arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/cpu.c | 2 +-
Includes changes in u-boot framework to support TF-A for NXP Chassis 3
platforms. A new defconfig is added namely ls*_tfa_defconfig which will
be used for all boot sources when TF-A is used.
Also, provide fixes for TF-A Boot NXP Chassis 2
Dear Tom,
The following changes since commit 1f2e948d6d53f77a2ddb2dde3531b0d5bc2815ad:
Prepare v2019.01-rc2 (2018-12-17 20:25:24 -0500)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.denx.de/u-boot-samsung master
for you to fetch changes up to c96d90367a6a229210b8b16681cfe9e5c8aeced1:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 10:49:03PM +0200, Ramon Fried wrote:
> Some architectures (MIPS) needs mapping to access IOMEM.
> Fix that.
>
> Fixes: f1dcc19b213d ("net: macb: Convert to driver model")
>
> Signed-off-by: Ramon Fried
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Schwierzeck
> ---
> v2: switched to use
Add David to review the pinctrl driver.
Thanks,
- Kever
On 12/17/2018 09:30 PM, Christoph Muellner wrote:
> The current pinctrl driver for the RK3399 has a range of qulity issues.
> E.g. it only implements the .set_state_simple() callback, it
> does not parse the available pinctrl information
System will get size '0' in 32bit system if the size is 4GB
for the address is 32bit only, return the max space available
instead of actual DDR size in rockchip_sdram_size().
Signed-off-by: Kever Yang
---
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c | 7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff
Hi Vagrant,
On 12/25/2018 12:14 AM, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> I'm not so lucky. 2019.01-rc2 hangs even earlier without detecting the
> ram (on a 4GB ram model)::
>
> U-Boot SPL 2019.01-rc2+dfsg-1~20181219~2 (Dec 19 2018 - 23:12:56 +)
> Returning to boot ROM...
>
>
> U-Boot
Hi,
On 21/12/18 22:57, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> Le 04/12/2018 à 05:47, Minkyu Kang a écrit :
>> Dear Tom,
>>
>> On 04/12/18 05:23, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 08:57:21PM +0100, Guillaume GARDET wrote:
>>>
Hi,
not sure through which tree it should go
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 04:57:26PM +0100, Stefano Babic wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> please pull from u-boot-imx, u-boot-imx-20181217, thanks !
>
> - fix missing MAINTANERS for embestmx6boards
> - drop Wolfgang's patch
> - apply V4 of "pico-imx7d: Increase the CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET size " that
> use fix
Hi Michał,
> Hello,
>
> I try to load some images from USB flash drive. When issuing/usb
> start/with the flash drive on to the first USB I get some following
> information:
>
> U-Boot 2018.09-36904-gae57ffc-dirty (Dec 18 2018 - 23:00:37 +0100)
>
> CPU: Freescale i.MX6ULL rev1.1 792
On Wed, 26 Dec 2018, Fabio Estevam wrote:
On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 7:18 PM Sergey Kubushyn wrote:
OK, so is it going to be IMX8M or MX8M?
Peng has already replied. It is going to be IMX8M:
On 26.12.18 22:33, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 12/26/18 10:23 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 25.12.18 10:36, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
>>> On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 03:03:51AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 18.12.18 06:02, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> See UEFI v2.7, section
On 12/26/18 10:23 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
> On 25.12.18 10:36, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 03:03:51AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 18.12.18 06:02, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
See UEFI v2.7, section 3.1.2 for details of the specification.
With
On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 7:18 PM Sergey Kubushyn wrote:
> OK, so is it going to be IMX8M or MX8M?
Peng has already replied. It is going to be IMX8M:
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-imx.git;a=commitdiff;h=3d145ff59d183850f11ba4157f03d05fc2fcb992;hp=0c0fbad318dd6d5bee5685489455f5a5eb48ff31
On 25.12.18 12:29, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 03:19:17AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 18.12.18 06:02, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
>>> "run -e" allows for executing EFI application with a specific "Boot"
>>> variable. If no "Boot" is specified or "BootOrder"
When calling efi_dp_from_mem() use a named constant for the memory type.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt
---
cmd/bootefi.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/cmd/bootefi.c b/cmd/bootefi.c
index f8f65c63f9d..d61609e84c0 100644
--- a/cmd/bootefi.c
+++
On 25.12.18 10:36, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 03:03:51AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 18.12.18 06:02, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
>>> See UEFI v2.7, section 3.1.2 for details of the specification.
>>>
>>> With my efishell command[1], you can try as the following:
>>>
On 25.12.18 09:44, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 02:56:40AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 19.12.18 13:23, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>>> On 12/19/18 2:49 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
Heinrich,
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 07:07:02AM +0100, Heinrich
On 26.12.18 11:07, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> Refactor the switch from supervisor to hypervisor to a new function called at
> the beginning of do_bootefi().
>
> Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt
> ---
> v2
> Use weak function with implementation in arch directories
> ---
>
On Wed, 26 Dec 2018, Tom Rini wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 07:14:02PM -0800, Sergey Kubushyn wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2018, Sergey Kubushyn wrote:
Yet another thought -- maybe it's time to move all 64-bit ARM stuff to its
own arch/arm64 as it is in Linux kernel since I don't remember when?
On 26.12.18 10:54, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 12/26/18 8:52 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 25.12.18 09:26, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>>> Refactor the switch from supervisor to hypervisor to a new function called
>>> at
>>> the beginning of do_bootefi().
>>
>> Why?
>
> Currently we
On 26.12.18 13:05, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> From: Heinrich Schuchardt
>> Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2018 10:57:38 +0100
>>
>> On 12/26/18 8:42 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>
>>> On 26.12.18 03:02, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
Thanks Mark for pointing this out.
We have some major
On 12/26/18 8:47 AM, Ooi, Joyce wrote:
> Adding Marek.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: U-Boot [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Ooi, Joyce
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2018 5:40 PM
>> To: Joe Hershberger
>> Cc: Ong, Hean Loong ; Priyanka Jain
>> ; See, Chin Liang ; u-
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 07:14:02PM -0800, Sergey Kubushyn wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Dec 2018, Sergey Kubushyn wrote:
>
> Yet another thought -- maybe it's time to move all 64-bit ARM stuff to its
> own arch/arm64 as it is in Linux kernel since I don't remember when? There
> are quite a few SoCs out
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 09:30:34PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 2:01 AM Simon Glass wrote:
> >
> > Add a migration plan for video which is an important subsystem in U-Boot.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
> > ---
> >
> > Makefile | 10 ++
>
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 07:00:10AM +0100, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 9:30 PM Simon Glass wrote:
> >
> > Add a migration plan for video which is an important subsystem in U-Boot.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
> > ---
> >
> > Makefile | 10
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 12:52:21PM +0800, Bin Meng wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 12:21 AM Andy Shevchenko
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > Since X86 implies SCSI and Intel Edison board does not use it, I have got a
> > = WARNING ==
> > This
The 'exception' command allows to test exception handling.
This implementation supports ARM, x86, RISC-V and the following exceptions:
* 'breakpoint' - prefetch abort exception (ARM 32bit only)
* 'unaligned' - data abort exception (ARM only)
* 'undefined' - undefined instruction exception
Hi Horatiu,
I am adding Daniel because actually this patch is needed to be able to
boot the Luton MIPS based platform. It is on this platform that we find
this issue.
Gregory
On mer., déc. 19 2018, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> When probing soft_spi the result of dev_get_parent_priv(dev) in probe
Hi Tom,
This sounds like a great idea! Could you possibly create a google calendar
event for this (including links/info to the zoom call/local dial-in
numbers) so I can add it to my calendar?
Best regards,
Trevor
___
U-Boot mailing list
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 06:37:02PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Add MMC nodes for HiKey board based on HI6220 SoC. There are two MMC
> controllers in this SoC, first one used for eMMC and second one used
> for SD card.
>
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam
> ---
>
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 04:30:19PM +0800, Bin Meng wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 4:17 PM Michal Simek wrote:
> >
> > On 20. 12. 18 9:09, Bin Meng wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 3:55 PM Michal Simek
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Test Xilinx Versal Virt platform running on
Hi,
26.12.2018 14:28, Priit Laes:
And while at it, why not finally add the DT register definitions for
Allwinner A20 NFC. I'm certainly not the author of these, and they have been
[...]
+ nand_pins_a: nand_base0@0 {
+ allwinner,pins = "PC0",
> From: Heinrich Schuchardt
> Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2018 10:57:38 +0100
>
> On 12/26/18 8:42 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >
> > On 26.12.18 03:02, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks Mark for pointing this out.
> >>
> >> We have some major differences between bootm and bootefi:
> >>
> >> -
On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 02:37:26PM +0300, Nikolai Zhubr wrote:
> And while at it, why not finally add the DT register definitions for
> Allwinner A20 NFC. I'm certainly not the author of these, and they have been
> around for many years already. Its quite unlikely they will suddenly change,
> or
And while at it, why not finally add the DT register definitions for
Allwinner A20 NFC. I'm certainly not the author of these, and they have
been around for many years already. Its quite unlikely they will
suddenly change, or vary between different A20-based devices. The A20
SoC is gradually
Add Hynix H27UBG8T2BTR nand chip identification.
These chips are sometimes present in e.g. older A20-olinuxino-micro boards.
Signed-off-by: Nikolai Zhubr
---
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_ids.c | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_ids.c
Refactor the switch from supervisor to hypervisor to a new function called at
the beginning of do_bootefi().
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt
---
v2
Use weak function with implementation in arch directories
---
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/Makefile | 1 +
On 12/26/18 8:42 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
> On 26.12.18 03:02, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>> On 12/25/18 1:39 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
From: Heinrich Schuchardt
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2018 09:26:57 +0100
Refactor the switch from supervisor to hypervisor to a new function
On 12/26/18 8:52 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
> On 25.12.18 09:26, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>> Refactor the switch from supervisor to hypervisor to a new function called at
>> the beginning of do_bootefi().
>
> Why?
Currently we have duplicate code for loading and starting EFI binaries
in
An NVME drive may be installed on the MACCHIATObin board using the PCIe
slot or on the Clearfog Pro using mini a PCI-e slot. With the configuration
change it becomes usable.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt
---
configs/clearfog_gt_8k_defconfig | 2 ++
configs/mvebu_db_armada8k_defconfig
On 25.12.18 13:00, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 04:11:14AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 03.12.18 08:02, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 12:46:20AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 05.11.18 10:06, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
>
On 25.12.18 09:26, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> Refactor the switch from supervisor to hypervisor to a new function called at
> the beginning of do_bootefi().
Why?
>
> Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt
> ---
> With this patch I am just moving around the switch from supervisor to
>
52 matches
Mail list logo
