RE: [PATCH v2 05/38] ppc: qemu: Fix CONFIG_SYS_PCI_MAP_END

2021-02-21 Thread Priyanka Jain
>-Original Message- >From: Bin Meng >Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2021 9:28 PM >To: Simon Glass ; Alexander Graf ; >Priyanka Jain >Cc: U-Boot Mailing List ; Tom Rini > >Subject: [PATCH v2 05/38] ppc: qemu: Fix CONFIG_SYS_PCI_MAP_END > >CONFIG_SYS_PCI_MAP_END currently points to

RE: [PATCH v2 03/38] common: fdt_support: Support special case of PCI address in fdt_read_prop()

2021-02-21 Thread Priyanka Jain
>-Original Message- >From: Bin Meng >Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2021 9:28 PM >To: Simon Glass ; Alexander Graf ; >Priyanka Jain >Cc: U-Boot Mailing List ; Tom Rini > >Subject: [PATCH v2 03/38] common: fdt_support: Support special case of PCI >address in fdt_read_prop() > >At present

RE: [PATCH v2 02/38] ppc: qemu: Update MAINTAINERS for correct email address

2021-02-21 Thread Priyanka Jain
>-Original Message- >From: Bin Meng >Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2021 9:28 PM >To: Simon Glass ; Alexander Graf ; >Priyanka Jain >Cc: U-Boot Mailing List ; Tom Rini > >Subject: [PATCH v2 02/38] ppc: qemu: Update MAINTAINERS for correct email >address > >Alex's previous email address

Re: [PATCH v3] video: sunxi_display: Convert to DM_VIDEO

2021-02-21 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
Hi Andre, On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 00:17:05 + Andre Przywara andre.przyw...@arm.com wrote: ... > Thanks for that. I just sent a v4 with some small fixes and all the > tags. > > And just to be sure: with "queue it" you mean for -next, so the April > merge window? I meant to queue it for my build

[PATCH v3 4/4] test: scmi: add local variables for scmi agent reference

2021-02-21 Thread Etienne Carriere
Add local variables agent0/agent1 to refer to SCMI sandbox context agent and ease readability of the test. For consistency, rename regul_dev to regul0_dev and remove sandbox_voltd in dm_test_scmi_voltage_domains(). Signed-off-by: Etienne Carriere --- Changes in v3 - new change added to the

[PATCH v3 3/4] firmware: scmi: fix inline comments and minor coding style issues

2021-02-21 Thread Etienne Carriere
Fix inline comments and empty line in scmi driver and test files. Remove test on IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_*_SCMI) in test/dm/scmi.c since these configuration are expected enabled when CONFIG_FIRMWARE_SCMI is enabled in sandbox configuration. Signed-off-by: Etienne Carriere Reviewed-by: Simon Glass

[PATCH v3 2/4] firmware: scmi: sandbox test for voltage regulator

2021-02-21 Thread Etienne Carriere
Implement sandbox regulator devices for SCMI voltage domains and test them in DM scmi tests. Signed-off-by: Etienne Carriere Reviewed-by: Simon Glass Reviewed-by: Jaehoon Chung --- Changes in v3: - applied review tags Changes in v2: - don't test IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DM_REGULATOR_SCMI) in

[PATCH v3 1/4] firmware: scmi: voltage regulator

2021-02-21 Thread Etienne Carriere
Implement voltage regulators interfaced by the SCMI voltage domain protocol. The DT bindings are defined in the Linux kernel since SCMI voltage domain and regulators patches [1] and [2] integration in v5.11-rc7. Link: [1]

RE: [PATCH 56/57] ppc: Remove T4160RDB board

2021-02-21 Thread Priyanka Jain
>-Original Message- >From: Tom Rini >Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2021 6:37 AM >To: u-boot@lists.denx.de >Cc: Priyanka Jain >Subject: [PATCH 56/57] ppc: Remove T4160RDB board > >This board has not been converted to CONFIG_DM_MMC by the deadline. >Remove it. As this is the last ARCH_T1023

RE: [PATCH 55/57] ppc: Remove T1023RDB board

2021-02-21 Thread Priyanka Jain
>-Original Message- >From: Tom Rini >Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2021 6:37 AM >To: u-boot@lists.denx.de >Cc: Priyanka Jain >Subject: [PATCH 55/57] ppc: Remove T1023RDB board > >This board has not been converted to CONFIG_DM_MMC by the deadline. >Remove it. As this is the last

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] firmware: scmi: sandbox test for voltage regulator

2021-02-21 Thread Etienne Carriere
On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 at 12:55, Simon Glass wrote: > > On Fri, 19 Feb 2021 at 06:34, Etienne Carriere > wrote: > > > > Implement sandbox regulator devices for SCMI voltage domains > > and test them in DM scmi tests. > > > > Signed-off-by: Etienne Carriere > > --- > > Changes in v2: > > - don't

RE: [PATCH 54/57] ppc: Remove MPC837XEMDS board

2021-02-21 Thread Priyanka Jain
>-Original Message- >From: Tom Rini >Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2021 6:37 AM >To: u-boot@lists.denx.de >Cc: Priyanka Jain >Subject: [PATCH 54/57] ppc: Remove MPC837XEMDS board > >This board has not been converted to CONFIG_DM_MMC by the deadline. >Remove it. As this is the last

RE: [PATCH 52/57] ppc: Remove MPC8569MDS board

2021-02-21 Thread Priyanka Jain
>-Original Message- >From: Tom Rini >Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2021 6:36 AM >To: u-boot@lists.denx.de >Cc: Priyanka Jain >Subject: [PATCH 52/57] ppc: Remove MPC8569MDS board > >This board has not been converted to CONFIG_DM_MMC by the deadline. >Remove it. As this is the last

RE: [PATCH 53/57] ppc: Remove Cyrus_P5020 and P5040 boards

2021-02-21 Thread Priyanka Jain
>-Original Message- >From: Tom Rini >Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2021 6:37 AM >To: u-boot@lists.denx.de >Cc: Andy Fleming ; Priyanka Jain > >Subject: [PATCH 53/57] ppc: Remove Cyrus_P5020 and P5040 boards > >These boards have not been converted to CONFIG_DM_MMC by the >deadline. >Remove

RE: [PATCH 51/57] ppc: configs: Remove a few non-updated build configurations

2021-02-21 Thread Priyanka Jain
>-Original Message- >From: Tom Rini >Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2021 6:36 AM >To: u-boot@lists.denx.de >Cc: Priyanka Jain >Subject: [PATCH 51/57] ppc: configs: Remove a few non-updated build >configurations > >In the cases of T2080RDB_SECURE_BOOT, T2080RDB_SRIO_PCIE_BOOT,

RE: [PATCH 49/57] ppc: Remove ARCH_P1022 support

2021-02-21 Thread Priyanka Jain
>-Original Message- >From: Tom Rini >Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2021 6:36 AM >To: u-boot@lists.denx.de >Cc: Priyanka Jain >Subject: [PATCH 49/57] ppc: Remove ARCH_P1022 support > >With the last of the ARCH_P1022 platforms removed, finish removing the rest of >the platform support. > >Cc:

RE: [PATCH 42/57] ppc: Remove T1040RDB boards

2021-02-21 Thread Priyanka Jain
>-Original Message- >From: Tom Rini >Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2021 6:36 AM >To: u-boot@lists.denx.de >Cc: Priyanka Jain ; Ruchika Gupta >; Sumit Garg >Subject: [PATCH 42/57] ppc: Remove T1040RDB boards > >These boards have not been converted to CONFIG_DM_MMC by the >deadline. >Remove

Re: [PATCH 2/3] am33xx: board: remove GPIO platforma data

2021-02-21 Thread Lokesh Vutla
Hi Dario, On 13/02/21 4:30 pm, Dario Binacchi wrote: > Since the board has been converted to driver model and DT is supported, > GPIO platform are no more required and can be removed. > > Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi Not all am335x platforms are converted to DT. Due to SPL size constraints

i.MX8MQ EVK not booting with latest mainline U-Boot

2021-02-21 Thread Fabio Estevam
Hi Peng and Andrey, Lukas reported that i.MX8MQ EVK does not boot with the latest U-Boot and I confirm the same here too. We are following the instructions from doc/board/freescale/imx8mq_evk.rst I haven't debugged this yet and I am wondering if you have any suggestions. Thanks, Fabio Estevam

[v2] arm: include: secure: Don't include asm\global_data.h in .S file

2021-02-21 Thread Siew Chin Lim
Commit "common: Drop asm/global_data.h from common header" added asm/global_data.h into secure.h. However, secure.h will be included by psci.S. Adding asm/global_data.h has caused compilation failure in pcsi.S. Update secure.h to only include asm/global_data.h in non-assembly section.

Re: [PATCH v2 14/38] test: cmd: Add a basic test for 'addrmap' command

2021-02-21 Thread Bin Meng
Hi Simon, On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 12:24 AM Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Bin, > > On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 at 06:01, Bin Meng wrote: > > > > Hi Simon, > > > > On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 7:55 PM Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 at 08:59, Bin Meng wrote: > > > > > > > > This adds a basic

RE: [PATCH] arm: include: secure: Don't include asm\global_data.h in .S file

2021-02-21 Thread Lim, Elly Siew Chin
Hi Simon, > -Original Message- > From: Simon Glass > Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2021 7:55 PM > To: Lim, Elly Siew Chin > Cc: U-Boot Mailing List ; Marek Vasut > ; Tan, Ley Foon ; See, Chin Liang > ; Simon Goldschmidt > ; Chee, Tien Fong > ; Westergreen, Dalon > ; Gan, Yau Wai >

Re: [PATCH v3] video: sunxi_display: Convert to DM_VIDEO

2021-02-21 Thread Andre Przywara
On Sun, 21 Feb 2021 17:47:53 +0100 Anatolij Gustschin wrote: Hi Anatolij, > On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 19:45:17 -0500 > Tom Rini tr...@konsulko.com wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 12:07:35AM +, Andre Przywara wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 7 Feb 2021 07:37:34 -0700 > > > Simon Glass wrote: > >

[PATCH v4] video: sunxi_display: Convert to DM_VIDEO

2021-02-21 Thread Andre Przywara
From: Jagan Teki DM_VIDEO migration deadline is already expired, but around 80 Allwinner boards are still using video in a legacy way: = WARNING == This board does not use CONFIG_DM_VIDEO Please update the board to use CONFIG_DM_VIDEO before the v2019.07

Re: [PATCH] mmc: fsl_esdhc_imx: fix the DTOCV to 0xE

2021-02-21 Thread Jaehoon Chung
On 2/20/21 4:25 AM, Ye Li wrote: > From: Haibo Chen > > On imx6Q/imx6DL, we find if config the DTOCV to 0~3, it will impact > cmd6 behavior, after cmd6 get transfer complete interrupt, the data0 > line will keep low over 5 seconds. This should be a IC bug on imx6Q/DL. > For other platforms, do

Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] firmware: scmi: fix inline comments and minor coding style issues

2021-02-21 Thread Jaehoon Chung
On 2/19/21 10:33 PM, Etienne Carriere wrote: > Fix inline comments and empty line in scmi driver and test files. > > Remove test on IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_*_SCMI) in test/dm/scmi.c since these > configuration are expected enabled when CONFIG_FIRMWARE_SCMI is enabled > in sandbox configuration. > >

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] firmware: scmi: sandbox test for voltage regulator

2021-02-21 Thread Jaehoon Chung
On 2/19/21 10:33 PM, Etienne Carriere wrote: > Implement sandbox regulator devices for SCMI voltage domains > and test them in DM scmi tests. > > Signed-off-by: Etienne Carriere Reviewed-by: Jaehoon Chung Best Regards, Jaehoon Chung > --- > Changes in v2: > - don't test

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] firmware: scmi: voltage regulator

2021-02-21 Thread Jaehoon Chung
On 2/19/21 10:33 PM, Etienne Carriere wrote: > Implement voltage regulators interfaced by the SCMI voltage domain > protocol. The DT bindings are defined in the Linux kernel since > SCMI voltage domain and regulators patches [1] and [2] integration > in v5.11-rc7. > > Link: [1] >

Re: Pull request for efi-2021-04-rc3

2021-02-21 Thread Tom Rini
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 10:50:05AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > The following changes since commit ea966d24ef3a9f7f32712a518a07374f9ae43905: > > Merge https://gitlab.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-sunxi > (2021-02-19 21:06:16 -0500) > > are available in the Git repository at: > >

Re: [U-Boot] Please pull from u-boot-i2c

2021-02-21 Thread Tom Rini
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 08:04:02AM +0100, Heiko Schocher wrote: > Hello Tom, > > please pull from u-boot-i2c.git master > > The following changes since commit ea966d24ef3a9f7f32712a518a07374f9ae43905: > > Merge https://gitlab.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-sunxi (2021-02-19 > 21:06:16

Re: [U-Boot] Please pull from u-boot-i2c

2021-02-21 Thread Tom Rini
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 08:04:02AM +0100, Heiko Schocher wrote: > Hello Tom, > > please pull from u-boot-i2c.git master > > The following changes since commit ea966d24ef3a9f7f32712a518a07374f9ae43905: > > Merge https://gitlab.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-sunxi (2021-02-19 > 21:06:16

Re: [PULL] u-boot-sh/master

2021-02-21 Thread Tom Rini
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 01:15:56AM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > The following changes since commit ea966d24ef3a9f7f32712a518a07374f9ae43905: > > Merge https://gitlab.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-sunxi (2021-02-19 > 21:06:16 -0500) > > are available in the Git repository at: > >

Re: [PATCH v3] video: sunxi_display: Convert to DM_VIDEO

2021-02-21 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 19:45:17 -0500 Tom Rini tr...@konsulko.com wrote: > On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 12:07:35AM +, Andre Przywara wrote: > > > On Sun, 7 Feb 2021 07:37:34 -0700 > > Simon Glass wrote: > > > > Hi Simon, > > > > coming back to this patch, answering to the other comments I skipped

Re: [PATCH v3] video: sunxi_display: Convert to DM_VIDEO

2021-02-21 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Andre, On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 at 17:08, Andre Przywara wrote: > > On Sun, 7 Feb 2021 07:37:34 -0700 > Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Simon, > > coming back to this patch, answering to the other comments I skipped > over the last time. > > In general this patch is the shortest way to get to some kind

Re: [PATCH v2 14/38] test: cmd: Add a basic test for 'addrmap' command

2021-02-21 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Bin, On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 at 06:01, Bin Meng wrote: > > Hi Simon, > > On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 7:55 PM Simon Glass wrote: > > > > On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 at 08:59, Bin Meng wrote: > > > > > > This adds a basic test for the newly introduced 'addrmap' command. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Bin Meng >

Re: [PATCH 44/57] ppc: Remove T2081QDS board and ARCH_T2081 support

2021-02-21 Thread Tom Rini
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 07:46:57PM +1300, Chris Packham wrote: > On Sun, 21 Feb 2021, 2:16 PM Tom Rini, wrote: > > > This board has not been converted to CONFIG_DM_MMC by the deadline. > > Remove it. It is also the only ARCH_T2081 board so remove that support > > as well. > > > > Cc: Shengzhou

Re: [PATCH 1/1] net: cortina_ni: buffer overrun

2021-02-21 Thread Ramon Fried
On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 11:44 AM Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > When copying to a u32 field we should use sizeof(u32) and not > sizeof(*u32) in memcpy. > > On 64bit systems like cortina_presidio-asic-emmc_defconfig using > sizeof(*u32) leads to a buffer overrun. > > Fixes: febe13b438b3 ("net:

Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] dm: i2c: use CONFIG_IS_ENABLED macro for DM_I2C/DM_I2C_GPIO

2021-02-21 Thread Heiko Schocher
Hello Igor, On 09.02.21 12:52, Igor Opaniuk wrote: > From: Igor Opaniuk > > Use CONFIG_IS_ENABLED() macro, which provides more convenient > way to check $(SPL)DM_I2C/$(SPL)DM_I2C_GPIO configs > for both SPL and U-Boot proper. > > CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(DM_I2C) expands to: > - 1 if CONFIG_SPL_BUILD

Re: [PATCH 35/57] arm: Remove mx53smd board

2021-02-21 Thread Fabio Estevam
On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 10:14 PM Tom Rini wrote: > > This board has not been converted to CONFIG_DM_MMC by the deadline. > Remove it. > > Cc: Fabio Estevam > Signed-off-by: Tom Rini Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam

Re: [PATCH 33/57] arm: Remove mx53ard board

2021-02-21 Thread Fabio Estevam
On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 10:14 PM Tom Rini wrote: > > This board has not been converted to CONFIG_DM_MMC by the deadline. > Remove it. > > Cc: Fabio Estevam > Signed-off-by: Tom Rini Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam

Re: [PATCH 07/57] arm: Remove mx25pdk board

2021-02-21 Thread Fabio Estevam
On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 10:08 PM Tom Rini wrote: > > This board has not been converted to CONFIG_DM_MMC by the deadline. > Remove it. > > Cc: Fabio Estevam > Signed-off-by: Tom Rini Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam

Re: [PATCH 2/2] mx28evk: Convert to driver model

2021-02-21 Thread Fabio Estevam
Hi Tom, On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 7:09 PM Tom Rini wrote: > Can you please do that in a follow-up to your series, as you're taking > over the overall platform? Thanks! Sure, I will send a follow-up patch removing the 3 other targets after this series gets applied. Thanks

Pull request for efi-2021-04-rc3

2021-02-21 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
The following changes since commit ea966d24ef3a9f7f32712a518a07374f9ae43905: Merge https://gitlab.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-sunxi (2021-02-19 21:06:16 -0500) are available in the Git repository at: https://gitlab.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-efi.git tags/efi-2021-04-rc3 for you

[PATCH] sunxi: add fdtoverlay_addr_r environment variable

2021-02-21 Thread Jernej Skrabec
Commit 69076dff2284 ("cmd: pxe: add support for FDT overlays") added support for loading DT overlay files to PXE boot. However, it needs additional environment variable which points to memory location which can be used to temporary store overlay data. Add it and in the process unify alignment

[PATCH 1/1] efi_loader: ACPI tables must be in EfiACPIReclaimMemory

2021-02-21 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
The UEFI spec does not allow ACPI tables to be in runtime services memory. It recommends EfiACPIReclaimMemory. Remove a superfluous check that the allocated pages are 16 byte aligned. EFI pages are 4 KiB aligned. Fixes: 86df34d42b05 ("efi_loader: Install ACPI configuration tables")

Re: [PATCH 1/2] efi: Add ESRT to the EFI system table

2021-02-21 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
On 2/19/21 7:04 PM, Jose Marinho wrote: The ESRT is initialised during efi_init_objlist after efi_initialize_system_table(). The ESRT is initially created with size for 50 FW image entries. The ESRT is resized when it runs out of space. Every resize adds 50 additional entries. Please,