Dear Simon Glass,
> Also please do check tests (make qcheck) since sandbox enables more
> options than most boards.
All tests passed, please check the detailed log in the attachment.
Best regards,
Rover Mo
At 2021-11-09 15:21:43, "Rover Mo" wrote:
>To prevent booting unsigned images, don't
To prevent booting unsigned images, don't enable the non-secure boot
commands(booti, bootz .etc) by default if secure boot enabled.
Signed-off-by: Rover Mo
Cc: Heinrich Schuchardt
Cc: Simon Glass
---
Changes for v2:
- Don't enable the non-secure boot commands too if !EFI_SECURE_BOOT
-
On 11/6/21 2:39 AM, Sean Anderson wrote:
> [ fsl_esdhc commit 30f6444d024a74ee48aa6969c1531aecd3c59deb ]
>
> Fix mmc->clock with actual clock which is divided by the
> controller, and record it with priv->clock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu
> Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson
> ---
>
> drivers/mmc
On 11/6/21 2:39 AM, Sean Anderson wrote:
> [ fsl_esdhc commit 07bae1de382723b94244096953b05225572728cd ]
>
> This patch is to clean up bus width setting code.
>
> - For DM_MMC, remove getting "bus-width" from device tree.
> This has been done in mmc_of_parse().
>
> - For non-DM_MMC, move bus w
TPM drivers have currently no maintainers. Add myself since I contributed
the TIS implementation.
Reviewed-by: Heinrich Schuchardt
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass
Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas
---
MAINTAINERS | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index
A previous patch added support for an mmio based TPM.
Add an example in QEMU on it's usage
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass
Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas
---
doc/board/emulation/qemu-arm.rst | 25 +
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
diff --git a/doc/board/emulation/qemu-arm.rs
Convert our SPI TPM driver and use the newly added API
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass
Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas
---
drivers/tpm/Makefile | 2 +-
drivers/tpm/tpm2_tis_spi.c | 447 +++--
2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 417 deletions(-)
diff --git a/driv
A previous commit is adding an MMIO TPMv2 driver. Include in the default
qemu arm configs, since we plan on using them on EFI testing
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass
Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas
---
configs/qemu_arm64_defconfig | 2 ++
configs/qemu_arm_defconfig | 2 ++
2 files changed, 4 insert
There's a lot of code duplication in U-Boot right now. All the TPM TIS
compatible drivers we have at the moment have their own copy of a TIS
implementation.
So let's create a common layer which implements the core TIS functions.
Any driver added from now own, which is compatible with the TIS spec
Add support for devices that expose a TPMv2 though MMIO.
Apart from those devices, we can use the driver in our QEMU setups and
test TPM related code which is difficult to achieve using the sandbox
driver (e.g test the EFI TCG2 protocol).
It's worth noting that a previous patch added TPMv2 TIS cor
With the upcoming TPM2 API, some of the functions name are part of the new
header file. So switch conflicting internal function names and defines.
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass
Reviewed-by: Heinrich Schuchardt
Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas
---
drivers/tpm/tpm_tis_lpc.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed,
With the upcoming TPM2 API, some of the functions name are part of the new
header file. So switch conflicting internal function names and defines.
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass
Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas
---
drivers/tpm/tpm_tis_infineon.c | 34 +-
1 file changed
Hi!
This is the update for [1].
Changes since v6:
- added a few missing @return in function documentation
- switched TPM1_ defines to TPM_INFINEON_
Changes since v5:
- Fixed 2 tpmv1.2 drivers. Some of the internal driver functions were
conflicting with the new API
Changes since v4:
- renamed st
Hi Marek and Pali,
On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 3:04 PM Marek Behún wrote:
>
> On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 14:48:03 -0800
> Tony Dinh wrote:
>
> > > So to avoid calling 'pci enum' manually, you need to put pci_init();
> > > function call into your board board_early_init_r() function.
> >
> > Thanks! will do th
On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 6:53 PM Peter Hoyes wrote:
>
> On 28/10/2021 19:55, Ramon Fried wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 10:56 PM Simon Glass wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 at 05:21, Andre Przywara
> >> wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 12:24:45 -0600
> >>> Simon Glass wrote:
>
On 11/4/21 4:13 PM, Minkyu Kang wrote:
> to fix following checkpatch warnings.
> Use 'if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG...))' instead of '#if or #ifdef' where
> possible
>
> Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang
> Cc: Dzmitry Sankouski
Reviewed-by: Jaehoon Chung
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-e
On 11/4/21 4:13 PM, Minkyu Kang wrote:
> to fix following checkpatch warings.
> WARNING: struct should normally be const
>
> Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang
> Cc: Dzmitry Sankouski
Reviewed-by: Jaehoon Chung
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/exynos/pinctrl-exynos78x0.c | 14 ++
On 11/6/21 12:39 AM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> Provide human readable descriptions of the speed nodes instead of the name
> of constants from the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt
Reviewed-by: Jaehoon Chung
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
> ---
> doc/usage/mmc.rst | 36
On 11/5/21 10:34 PM, Julien Masson wrote:
> With the recent changes on mmc driver, we saw that the boot is ~5 secs
> longer compared to v2021.07 on mediatek platforms.
>
> This regression is seen during mmc_init and caused by the following
> patch [1].
>
> Indeed since we did not support poll dat
On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 18:20:43 -0800
Roman Bacik wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 5:12 PM Marek Behún wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 16:48:33 -0800
> > Roman Bacik wrote:
> >
> > > To be honest changing status codes coming from FW does not seem right. But
> > > we will try to make the requeste
Hi Tom,
The following changes since commit 52207514ba419a69a8105d16997b025f966c8879:
Merge branch '2021-11-05-Kconfig-syncs' (2021-11-05 15:38:46 -0400)
are available in the Git repository at:
https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-riscv.git
for you to fetch changes up to 990e1e4
On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 5:12 PM Marek Behún wrote:
>
> On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 16:48:33 -0800
> Roman Bacik wrote:
>
> > To be honest changing status codes coming from FW does not seem right. But
> > we will try to make the requested changes.
>
> I looked at kernel's implementation of this driver and t
On Mon, 2021-11-08 at 22:39 +0100, Daniel Schwierzeck wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, dem 04.11.2021 um 17:48 +0800 schrieb Weijie Gao:
> > This patch adds support for MediaTek MT7621 SoC.
> > All files are dedicated for u-boot.
> >
> > Currently only ramboot is supported.
> > The default build target is
HI jagan and ta
I might have a different view， the caller can not get the correct response even
though we can not
operate the device sucessfully.
I think it is necessary to return a valid value.
if return 0, the device cannot actually be operated but the correct results are
not possible
On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 17:17:33 +0100
Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 11/8/21 17:05, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 08:58:33AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 at 04:18, Heinrich Schuchardt
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 11/6/21 14:53, Tom Rini
Support for booting from removable media is now added to UEFI boot
manager. Here we should modify efidebug command in order to define
a proper "Boot" variable.
With this patch applied, you will be able to specify the boot order,
usb and scsi:
=> efidebug -b 1 SCSI scsi 0:1
=> efidebug boot dum
Under the current implementation, booting from removal media using
a architecture-specific default image name, say BOOTAA64.EFI, is
supported only in distro_bootcmd script. See the commit 74522c898b35
("efi_loader: Add distro boot script for removable media").
This is, however, half-baked implemen
This function will be used in the next commit where some behavior
of EFI boot manager will be expanded.
Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro
---
include/efi_loader.h | 4
lib/efi_loader/efi_boottime.c | 7 +++
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/efi
# This task is a bit motivated by Simon's discussion about bootflow[1].
Booting UEFI system from removable media is currently supported by
distro_bootcmd script. But the behavior should be best implemented
in UEFI Boot Manager.
(Historically, the boot manager was added later than the support for
r
On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 16:48:33 -0800
Roman Bacik wrote:
> To be honest changing status codes coming from FW does not seem right. But
> we will try to make the requested changes.
I looked at kernel's implementation of this driver and these hwrm
functions and they don't return STATUS_*.
Marek
Hi Marek,
> -Original Message-
> From: Marek Behún
> Sent: Monday, November 8, 2021 3:43 PM
> To: Roman Bacik
> Cc: U-Boot Mailing List ; Pali Rohar
> ; Bharat Gooty ; Joe
> Hershberger ; Ramon Fried
>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/2] net: brcm: netXtreme driver
>
> Hello Roman,
>
> some
On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 05:09:14PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Heinrich,
>
> On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 09:17, Heinrich Schuchardt
> wrote:
> >
> > On 11/8/21 17:05, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 08:58:33AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 at 04:
On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 11:05, Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
>
> Compiler is not happy:
>
> common/image-board.c: In function ‘boot_get_kbd’:
> common/image-board.c:902:17: warning: implicit declaration of function
> ‘do_bdinfo’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> 902 | do_bdinfo(NULL, 0
Hi Heinrich,
On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 09:17, Heinrich Schuchardt
wrote:
>
> On 11/8/21 17:05, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 08:58:33AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 at 04:18, Heinrich Schuchardt
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 11/6/21 14:53, To
On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 11:04, Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
>
> After the commit 4ed37abc49c2 ("image: Remove ifdefs around
> image_setup_linux() el at"):
>
> common/image-board.c: In function ‘boot_get_kbd’:
> common/image-board.c:902:17: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘do_bdinfo’
> 902 | d
Hi,
On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 11:45, Ilias Apalodimas
wrote:
>
> Hi chiming in a little late but
>
> On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 06:46, AKASHI Takahiro
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 10:12:16AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > Hi Takahiro,
> > >
> > > On Thu, 4 Nov 2021 at 20:49, AKASHI Takahiro
Hello Roman,
some last requests from me.
On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 14:46:10 -0800
Roman Bacik wrote:
> +#define bnxt_down_chip(bp) bnxt_hwrm_run(down_chip, bp, 0)
> +#define bnxt_bring_chip(bp)bnxt_hwrm_run(bring_chip, bp, 1)
Could these be changed to functions instead of macros, please?
>
On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 14:48:03 -0800
Tony Dinh wrote:
> > So to avoid calling 'pci enum' manually, you need to put pci_init();
> > function call into your board board_early_init_r() function.
>
> Thanks! will do that.
Don't do that.
Instead enable CONFIG_PCI_INIT_R and CONFIG_SYS_EARLY_PCI_INIT
On Monday 08 November 2021 09:31:14 Roman Bacik wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Pali Rohár
> > Sent: Sunday, November 7, 2021 1:44 AM
> > To: Roman Bacik
> > Cc: U-Boot Mailing List ; Bharat Gooty
> > ; Joe Hershberger
> > ; Ramon Fried
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] net: brcm:
Hi Pali,
On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 2:02 PM Pali Rohár wrote:
>
> On Monday 08 November 2021 12:54:39 Tony Dinh wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 3:11 AM Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Sunday 07 November 2021 18:08:56 Tony Dinh wrote:
> ...
> > > > > I think some more investigation is needed. Why did we
From: Bharat Gooty
Broadcom bnxt L2 driver support. Used by the Broadcom
iproc platforms.
Signed-off-by: Bharat Gooty
Reviewed-by: Ramon Fried
Signed-off-by: Roman Bacik
---
Changes in v10:
- move unnecessary code from bnxt_read_rom_hwaddr to bnxt_eth_probe
Changes in v9:
- remove bnxt_ver
From: Bharat Gooty
Load NetXtreme firmware in board_init when BNXT_ETH is selected.
Signed-off-by: Bharat Gooty
Signed-off-by: Roman Bacik
---
(no changes since v4)
Changes in v4:
- remove bnxt commands
- load bnxt firmware in board_init
Changes in v3:
- remove commands set/get mac/speed
-
On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 10:40 AM Roman Bacik wrote:
>
> From: Bharat Gooty
>
> Broadcom bnxt L2 driver support. Used by the Broadcom
> iproc platforms.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bharat Gooty
> Reviewed-by: Ramon Fried
>
> Signed-off-by: Roman Bacik
> ---
>
> Changes in v9:
> - remove bnxt_ver.h
> - ad
On Monday 08 November 2021 12:54:39 Tony Dinh wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 3:11 AM Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Sunday 07 November 2021 18:08:56 Tony Dinh wrote:
...
> > > > I think some more investigation is needed. Why did we need to do "pci
> > > > enum", and then "usb reset", in that order, to
Am Donnerstag, dem 04.11.2021 um 17:48 +0800 schrieb Weijie Gao:
> The mt7621_rfb board supports integrated giga PHYs plus one external
> giga PHYs. It also has up to 512MiB DDR3, 16MB SPI-NOR, 3 mini PCI-e
> x1
> slots, SDXC and USB.
>
> The mt7621_nand_rfb board is almost the same as mt7621_rfb
Am Donnerstag, dem 04.11.2021 um 17:48 +0800 schrieb Weijie Gao:
> This patch adds support for MediaTek MT7621 SoC.
> All files are dedicated for u-boot.
>
> Currently only ramboot is supported.
> The default build target is u-boot-lzma.img.
> This file can be booted using bootm command, or be use
Hi Pali,
On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 3:11 AM Pali Rohár wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> On Sunday 07 November 2021 18:08:56 Tony Dinh wrote:
> > Hi Pali,
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 7, 2021 at 4:58 PM Tony Dinh wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Pali,
> > >
> > > Looks like it is working! But in a weird way. Please see my response
From: Bharat Gooty
Broadcom bnxt L2 driver support. Used by the Broadcom
iproc platforms.
Signed-off-by: Bharat Gooty
Reviewed-by: Ramon Fried
Signed-off-by: Roman Bacik
---
Changes in v9:
- remove bnxt_ver.h
- add DRIVER_VERSION_* definitions to bnxt.h
- remove pci_read_/pci_write_/pci_map
Hi chiming in a little late but
On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 06:46, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 10:12:16AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Takahiro,
> >
> > On Thu, 4 Nov 2021 at 20:49, AKASHI Takahiro
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 08:02:05PM -0600, Simon Glass
From: Bharat Gooty
Load NetXtreme firmware in board_init when BNXT_ETH is selected.
Signed-off-by: Bharat Gooty
Signed-off-by: Roman Bacik
---
(no changes since v4)
Changes in v4:
- remove bnxt commands
- load bnxt firmware in board_init
Changes in v3:
- remove commands set/get mac/speed
-
Compiler is not happy:
common/image-board.c: In function ‘boot_get_kbd’:
common/image-board.c:902:17: warning: implicit declaration of function
‘do_bdinfo’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
902 | do_bdinfo(NULL, 0, 0, NULL);
| ^
Move the forward de
After the commit 4ed37abc49c2 ("image: Remove ifdefs around
image_setup_linux() el at"):
common/image-board.c: In function ‘boot_get_kbd’:
common/image-board.c:902:17: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘do_bdinfo’
902 | do_bdinfo(NULL, 0, 0, NULL);
| ^
comm
> -Original Message-
> From: Pali Rohár
> Sent: Sunday, November 7, 2021 1:44 AM
> To: Roman Bacik
> Cc: U-Boot Mailing List ; Bharat Gooty
> ; Joe Hershberger
> ; Ramon Fried
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] net: brcm: netXtreme driver
>
> Hello!
>
> When sending a new version of patch, tr
From: Pali Rohár
kwbimage v0 sldo has 32-bit data checksum at the end like kwbimage v1.
Use same data checksum validation for both v0 and v1 image types.
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
Signed-off-by: Marek Behún
---
tools/kwbimage.c | 80 ++--
1 file ch
From: Pali Rohár
For documentation purposes update struct main_hdr_v0 to include information
where version of the image must be stored. For kwbimage v0 it obviously
must be 0. By default all image header memory is initialized to zero,
therefore this change has no functional effect.
Signed-off-by
From: Pali Rohár
Field srcaddr in kwbimage v0 needs to be adjusted similarly like in v1.
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
Signed-off-by: Marek Behún
---
tools/kwbimage.c | 22 ++
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/kwbimage.c b/tools/kwbimage.c
index 952023c14c..
From: Pali Rohár
Fill the real header size without padding into the main header
This allows to reduce final image when converting image to another format
which does not need additional padding.
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
Signed-off-by: Marek Behún
---
tools/kwbimage.c | 9 +
1 file ch
From: Pali Rohár
Kwbimage v0 has similar alignment requirements as v1.
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
Signed-off-by: Marek Behún
---
tools/kwbimage.c | 24
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/kwbimage.c b/tools/kwbimage.c
index 114b313b4d..
From: Pali Rohár
Currently kwbimage header is always aligned to 4096 bytes. But it does not
have to be aligned to such a high value.
The header needs to be just 4-byte aligned, while some image types have
additional alignment restrictions.
This change reduces size of kwbimage binaries by removi
From: Pali Rohár
This change allows to convert image from one format to another without need
to include unnecessary padding (e.g. when target image format has smaller
alignment requirement as source image format).
Do it by storing real image data size without padding to the kwbimage
header.
Sig
From: Pali Rohár
xmodem block size is 128 bytes, therefore it is possible to transfer only
images with size multiple of 128 bytes. kwboot automatically pads image
with zero bytes at the end to align it to 128 bytes boundary.
Do this padding when generating image to allow uploading with other xmo
From: Pali Rohár
There are more unused enums and function prototypes. Remove them. The
function kwbimage_check_params() does not return enum kwbimage_cmd_types,
but a boolean value returned as int.
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
Signed-off-by: Marek Behún
---
tools/kwbimage.c | 2 +-
tools/kwbima
From: Pali Rohár
kwbimage must have valid blockid member instead of zero value. Thus if
config file does not contain BOOT_FROM command, use by default the value
for SPI booting (which is probably the most common).
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
Signed-off-by: Marek Behún
---
tools/kwbimage.c | 32
From: Pali Rohár
These two commands allow to specify custom setting of UART port used for
printing BootROM messages.
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
Signed-off-by: Marek Behún
---
tools/kwbimage.c | 20 +++-
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/kwbimag
From: Marek Behún
Hi Stefan,
Pali has prepared another series of patches for kwbimage, I have reviewed
them.
Marek
Pali Rohár (11):
tools: kwbimage: Add support for new commands UART_PORT and UART_MPP
tools: kwbimage: Explicitly set version also for kwbimage v0
tools: kwbimage: Set BOOT_
From: Marek Behún
Hi Stefan,
Pali has prepared another series of patches for kwbimage, I have reviewed
them.
Marek
Pali Rohár (11):
tools: kwbimage: Add support for new commands UART_PORT and UART_MPP
tools: kwbimage: Explicitly set version also for kwbimage v0
tools: kwbimage: Set BOOT_
On 28/10/2021 19:55, Ramon Fried wrote:
On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 10:56 PM Simon Glass wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 at 05:21, Andre Przywara wrote:
On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 12:24:45 -0600
Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Simon,
On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 at 02:40, Peter Hoyes wrote:
From: Peter Hoyes
If us
Hi Heinrich
On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 17:55, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/7/21 22:33, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> > With the upcoming TPM2 API, some of the function names are part of the new
> > header file. So switch conflicting driver defined function names and
> > defines.
> >
> > Signe
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 18:17, Simon Glass wrote:
> ) to signal Hi François,
>
> On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 10:31, François Ozog
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Simon,
> >
> > Le ven. 5 nov. 2021 à 17:12, Simon Glass a écrit :
> >>
> >> Hi François,
> >>
> >> On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 02:27, François Ozog
> wrote:
>
On 11/8/21 17:05, Tom Rini wrote:
On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 08:58:33AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 at 04:18, Heinrich Schuchardt
wrote:
On 11/6/21 14:53, Tom Rini wrote:
On Sat, Nov 06, 2021 at 04:55:44AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 11/6/21 02:52, Andre Przy
On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 09:09:20AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 09:05, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 08:58:33AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 at 04:18, Heinrich Schuchardt
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
Hi Tom,
On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 09:05, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 08:58:33AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 at 04:18, Heinrich Schuchardt
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 11/6/21 14:53, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Nov 06, 2021 at 04:55:44AM +
On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 08:58:33AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 at 04:18, Heinrich Schuchardt
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 11/6/21 14:53, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 06, 2021 at 04:55:44AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 11/6/21 02:52, Andr
On 11/7/21 22:33, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
With the upcoming TPM2 API, some of the function names are part of the new
header file. So switch conflicting driver defined function names and
defines.
Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas
Reviewed-by: Heinrich Schuchardt
---
drivers/tpm/tpm_tis_
Hi Ilias,
On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 at 14:33, Ilias Apalodimas
wrote:
>
> There's a lot of code duplication in U-Boot right now. All the TPM TIS
> compatible drivers we have at the moment have their own copy of a TIS
> implementation.
>
> So let's create a common layer which implements the core TIS fun
Hi Takahiro,
On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 at 21:15, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 10:12:20AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Takahiro,
> >
> > On Thu, 4 Nov 2021 at 21:24, AKASHI Takahiro
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 08:02:37PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > > Hi
Hi,
On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 at 04:18, Heinrich Schuchardt
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/6/21 14:53, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 06, 2021 at 04:55:44AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 11/6/21 02:52, Andre Przywara wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 18:56:34 -0400
> >>> Tom Rini wrote:
> >>
Hi Roman,
On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 08:43, Roman Kopytin wrote:
>
> Hi, I sent patches, please check.
> But before correct emails I sent several test emails.
OK I see them, not copied to me, but I see them in the mailing list, thank you.
Regards,
Simon
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon
Hi Ilias,
On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 at 14:33, Ilias Apalodimas
wrote:
>
> Add support for devices that expose a TPMv2 though MMIO.
> Apart from those devices, we can use the driver in our QEMU setups and
> test TPM related code which is difficult to achieve using the sandbox
> driver (e.g test the EFI T
Hi Heinrich,
On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 08:39, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/8/21 06:29, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 09:43:22AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> >> Hi Heinrich,
> >>
> >> On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 at 01:21, Heinrich Schuchardt
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 at 14:33, Ilias Apalodimas
wrote:
>
> With the upcoming TPM2 API, some of the function names are part of the new
> header file. So switch conflicting driver defined function names and
> defines.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas
> ---
> drivers/tpm/tpm_tis_lpc.c | 4 ++--
>
Hi Andy,
On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 at 01:38, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 7, 2021 at 6:43 PM Simon Glass wrote:
> > On Sat, 6 Nov 2021 at 01:59, Andy Shevchenko
> > wrote:
> > > On Saturday, November 6, 2021, Simon Glass wrote:
> > >> On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 14:10, Andy Shevchenko
> > >> wr
On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 at 14:33, Ilias Apalodimas
wrote:
>
> With the upcoming TPM2 API, some of the function names are part of the new
> header file. So switch conflicting driver defined function names and
> defines.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas
> ---
> drivers/tpm/tpm_tis_infineon.c | 34 +
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 07:35:50PM +0530, Sinthu Raja wrote:
> From: Sinthu Raja
>
> Enable support for selecting DTB from FIT within SPL based on the
> board name read from EEPROM. This will help to use single defconfig
> for both EVM and SK.
>
> Also print FDT model name and board name read f
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 07:35:48PM +0530, Sinthu Raja wrote:
> From: Sinthu Raja
>
> j721e-sk doesn't have any daughter cards, so disable daughter
> card probing inside board_late_init() and spl_board_init() for
> j721e-sk.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sinthu Raja
> ---
>
> Changes in V2:
> * J721E EAIK
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 07:35:46PM +0530, Sinthu Raja wrote:
> From: Sinthu Raja
>
> J721E EVM has EEPROM populated at 0x50. J721E SK has EEPROM populated
> at next address 0x51 in order to be compatible with RBPi. So start
> looking for TI specific EEPROM at 0x50, if not found look for EEPROM a
On 11/7/21 22:33, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
With the upcoming TPM2 API, some of the function names are part of the new
header file. So switch conflicting driver defined function names and
defines.
Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas
---
drivers/tpm/tpm_tis_infineon.c | 34 +-
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 07:35:45PM +0530, Sinthu Raja wrote:
> From: Sinthu Raja
>
> board_late_init(), setup_board_eeprom_env() and setup_serial() is
> called only under CONFIG_BOARD_LATE_INIT, so guard these functions
> with the same.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sinthu Raja
> ---
>
> No chnages in V
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 07:35:42PM +0530, Sinthu Raja wrote:
> From: Sinthu Raja
>
> Enable support for show_board_info() in SPL build.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sinthu Raja
OK, but why do we need this, and won't it cause every platform that has
this defined to now grow in size?
--
Tom
signature
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 07:35:52PM +0530, Sinthu Raja wrote:
> From: Sinthu Raja
>
> J721E Starter Kit (SK)[1] is a low cost, small form factor board designed
> for TI’s J721E SoC. TI’s J721E SoC comprises of dual core A72, high
> performance vision accelerators, video codec accelerators, latest
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 07:35:53PM +0530, Sinthu Raja wrote:
> From: Sinthu Raja
>
> Add R5 specific dts for J721E-SK
>
> Signed-off-by: Sinthu Raja
> ---
>
> Changes in V2:
> * J721E EAIK board name is changed to J721E SK, rename all occurrences of
> eaik
> to sk.
> * Rename file from eaik
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 07:35:51PM +0530, Sinthu Raja wrote:
> From: Sinthu Raja
>
> Board ID I2C EEPROM will be probed before SYSFW is available.
> So drop the power-domains property for wakup_i2c0 on which
> board ID EEPROM is connected.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sinthu Raja
> ---
>
> No Changes in
Hi, I sent patches, please check.
But before correct emails I sent several test emails.
-Original Message-
From: Simon Glass
Sent: Friday, November 5, 2021 5:02 AM
To: Roman Kopytin
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes ; U-Boot Mailing List
; Alex Kiernan ; Masahiro Yamada
Subject: Re: [PATCH] intro
On 11/8/21 06:29, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
On Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 09:43:22AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Heinrich,
On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 at 01:21, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 11/4/21 04:09, Simon Glass wrote:
At present UCLASS_EFI is used to represent an EFI filesystem among other
thing
On Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 10:59:44PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> Convert CONFIG_SYS_PROMPT et al to Kconfig
>
> This converts the following to Kconfig:
>CONFIG_SYS_PROMPT
>CONFIG_SYS_PROMPT_HUSH_PS2
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini
I clearly forgot to remove the very first two lines when I merge
Hi All,
I'm new to U-boot.
What are all testing tools available in Uboot to check
1. MMC
2. DDR
3. ethernet
and how to use tools if available?
Signed-off-by: Roman Kopytin
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes
---
test/py/tests/test_vboot.py | 8
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/test/py/tests/test_vboot.py b/test/py/tests/test_vboot.py
index 6dff6779d1..cf7416b39a 100644
--- a/test/py/tests/test_vboot.py
+++ b/test/py/tests/test_v
Having to use the -K option to mkimage to populate U-Boot's .dtb with the
public key while signing the kernel FIT image is often a little
awkward. In particular, when using a meta-build system such as
bitbake/Yocto, having the tasks of the kernel and U-Boot recipes
intertwined, modifying deployed a
In order to reduce the coupling between building the kernel and
U-Boot, I'd like a tool that can add a public key to U-Boot's dtb
without simultaneously signing a FIT image. That tool doesn't seem to
exist, so I stole the necessary pieces from mkimage et al and put it
in a single .c file.
I'm stil
Having to use the -K option to mkimage to populate U-Boot's .dtb with the
public key while signing the kernel FIT image is often a little
awkward. In particular, when using a meta-build system such as
bitbake/Yocto, having the tasks of the kernel and U-Boot recipes
intertwined, modifying deployed a
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
