On 11/30/22 08:37, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
Hi Heinrich,
On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 05:10:56PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
The dhcp command may be executed after the first UEFI command.
We should still update the EFI_PXE_BASE_CODE_PROTOCOL.
Don't leak content of prior acknowledge
Hi Heinrich,
On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 05:10:56PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> The dhcp command may be executed after the first UEFI command.
> We should still update the EFI_PXE_BASE_CODE_PROTOCOL.
>
> Don't leak content of prior acknowledge packages.
>
> Handle out of memory.
>
The
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 06:35:40PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 11/29/22 16:38, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> > Hi Heinrich,
> >
> > On Tue, 29 Nov 2022 at 17:04, Heinrich Schuchardt
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Memory allocated by U-Boot for internal usage should be
> > >
Hi Tom
On 29/11/22 19:01, Tom Rini wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 03:10:12PM +0300, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
вт, 29 нояб. 2022 г. в 09:50, Neha Malcom Francis :
EEPROM detection logic in ti_i2c_eeprom_get() involves figuring out
whether addressing is 1-byte or 2-byte. There are currently
Hi Matwey
On 29/11/22 17:40, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
вт, 29 нояб. 2022 г. в 09:50, Neha Malcom Francis :
EEPROM detection logic in ti_i2c_eeprom_get() involves figuring out
whether addressing is 1-byte or 2-byte. There are currently different
behaviours seen across boards as documented in
Okay, FWIW I created a pull request with my suggestions here:
https://github.com/FirmwareHandoff/firmware_handoff/pull/4
That should make it easier to discuss specific details, hopefully. As
I was looking at the header size and format more closely I noticed
that the checksum calculation and some
Almost, but not quite. USB_DIR_IN is 0x80, USB_DIR_OUT is just 0, so testing
(ctrl->bRequestType & USB_DIR_OUT) is meaningless. Instead, the test for an OUT
transfer should be !(ctrl->bRequestType & USB_DIR_IN).
Sultan
> On Nov 29, 2022, at 6:05 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>
> Hi Sultan,
>
>
Hi,
On Wed, 30 Nov 2022 at 14:52, Julius Werner wrote:
>
> Hi Jose,
>
> Apologies for the late response, I had to find some time to dig back
> into this topic first.
>
> > The proposal is that the tag assignments are handled via a PR to [1].
> > A PR should provide reasoning for the proposed
Hi Jose,
Apologies for the late response, I had to find some time to dig back
into this topic first.
> The proposal is that the tag assignments are handled via a PR to [1].
> A PR should provide reasoning for the proposed entry layout as well as a
> description of the use-case being serviced.
>
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 4:11 PM Vladimir Oltean wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 02:53:15PM -0800, Tim Harvey wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 7:58 AM Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 05:49:33PM -0700, Tim Harvey wrote:
> > >
> > > > Allow rcv() and xmit() dsa driver ops
> From: Zong Li
> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2022 10:02 AM
> To: Sean Anderson
> Cc: s...@chromium.org; michal.si...@amd.com; sean.ander...@seco.com; Leo
> Yu-Chi Liang(梁育齊) ; Rick Jian-Zhi Chen(陳建志)
> ; u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: use imply instead of select for
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 02:53:15PM -0800, Tim Harvey wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 7:58 AM Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 05:49:33PM -0700, Tim Harvey wrote:
> >
> > > Allow rcv() and xmit() dsa driver ops to be optional in case a driver
> > > does not care to mangle a packet
Hi Rob,
ping for any comments?
- Simon
On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 at 12:59, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Tue, 15 Nov 2022 at 14:56, Simon Glass wrote:
> >
> > Hi Rob,
> >
> > On Mon, 14 Nov 2022 at 10:44, Rob Herring wrote:
> > >
> > > +Ilias, Bill and Joakim
> > >
> > > On Sat, Nov 12,
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 02:53:15PM -0800, Tim Harvey wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 7:58 AM Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 05:49:33PM -0700, Tim Harvey wrote:
> >
> > > Allow rcv() and xmit() dsa driver ops to be optional in case a driver
> > > does not care to mangle a packet
Hi Sultan,
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 4:49 PM Sultan Khan wrote:
>
> While I haven't yet gotten around to trying DFU with this patch applied, my
> guess as to the issue would be the checks of the form "if (ctrl->
> bRequestType == USB_DIR_OUT)" or "if (ctrl->bRequestType == USB_DIR_IN)".
> The
On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 7:58 AM Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 05:49:33PM -0700, Tim Harvey wrote:
>
> > Allow rcv() and xmit() dsa driver ops to be optional in case a driver
> > does not care to mangle a packet as in U-Boot only one network port is
> > enabled at a time and thus no
On 11/29/22 20:49, Sultan Khan wrote:
While I haven't yet gotten around to trying DFU with this patch applied, my
guess as to the issue would be the checks of the form "if (ctrl->
bRequestType == USB_DIR_OUT)" or "if (ctrl->bRequestType == USB_DIR_IN)".
The bRequestType field contains many flag
While I haven't yet gotten around to trying DFU with this patch applied, my
guess as to the issue would be the checks of the form "if (ctrl->
bRequestType == USB_DIR_OUT)" or "if (ctrl->bRequestType == USB_DIR_IN)".
The bRequestType field contains many flag bits other than the direction
bit. The
With recently added wireless offloading features in Linux [1] the
number of reserved memory regions with MediaTek SoCs supporting
offloading wireless-to-Ethernet traffic grew beyond the default (8)
which breaks booting Linux:
ERROR: Failed to allocate 0xa6ac bytes below 0xc000.
device tree -
On 11/29/22 16:38, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
Hi Heinrich,
On Tue, 29 Nov 2022 at 17:04, Heinrich Schuchardt
wrote:
Memory allocated by U-Boot for internal usage should be
EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA or _CODE or EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DATA or _CODE.
Agreed, EFI_LOADER_DATA should be for EFI apps.
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 04:25:13PM +0100, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 1:50 PM Roger Quadros wrote:
> >
> > The BCH detection hardware can generate ECC bytes for multiple
> > sectors in one go. Use that feature.
> >
> > correct() only corrects one sector at a
Reviewed-by: François-Frédéric Ozog
I confirm the patch addresses the issue
Le 29/11/2022 16:04, « Heinrich Schuchardt »
a écrit :
Memory allocated by U-Boot for internal usage should be
EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA or _CODE or EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DATA or _CODE.
Reported-by:
Hi Heinrich,
On Tue, 29 Nov 2022 at 17:04, Heinrich Schuchardt
wrote:
>
> Memory allocated by U-Boot for internal usage should be
> EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA or _CODE or EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DATA or _CODE.
Agreed, EFI_LOADER_DATA should be for EFI apps.
>
> Reported-by: François-Frédéric Ozog
>
Hi Roger,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 1:50 PM Roger Quadros wrote:
>
> The BCH detection hardware can generate ECC bytes for multiple
> sectors in one go. Use that feature.
>
> correct() only corrects one sector at a time so we need to call it
> repeatedly for each sector.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roger
ZynqMP mini configurations are not using IPI driver and enabling this is
adding additional ~1200 Bytes (depends on configuration).
This ends up in situation that there is no enough space in OCM for
relocation that's why disable this driver for all mini configurations.
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek
Memory allocated by U-Boot for internal usage should be
EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA or _CODE or EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DATA or _CODE.
Reported-by: François-Frédéric Ozog
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt
---
cmd/efidebug.c | 2 +-
lib/efi_loader/efi_memory.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 3
I'll fix it soon and send new patchset!
Thanks!
От: Tom Rini
Отправлено: 29 ноября 2022 г. 16:49:48
Кому: Vyacheslav Mitrofanov V
Копия: rfried@gmail.com; joe.hershber...@ni.com; w...@denx.de;
u-boot@lists.denx.de; judge.pack...@gmail.com; li...@yadro.com;
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 08:39:36AM +, Vyacheslav Mitrofanov V wrote:
> Tom, maybe it is better to change configs add ifdefs or do sth else to
> exclude them from the build if IPV6 is not configured?
There's two parts to this, yes. Sandbox needs to enable ipv6 so that
the tests are run, and
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 03:10:12PM +0300, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
> вт, 29 нояб. 2022 г. в 09:50, Neha Malcom Francis :
> >
> > EEPROM detection logic in ti_i2c_eeprom_get() involves figuring out
> > whether addressing is 1-byte or 2-byte. There are currently different
> > behaviours seen across
Hi Michael,
On 28/11/2022 16:27, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 1:50 PM Roger Quadros wrote:
>>
>> nand_bbt.c is not being built with the nand_base driver during SPL
>> build. This results in build failures if we try to access any nand_bbt
>> related
The commit b7e0750d8872 ("zynq: Convert arm twd timer to DM driver")
switched timer to DM but missing to add nodes to all mini configurations.
Based on it missing timer end up in non functional system where any delay
doesn't work.
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek
---
arch/arm/dts/zynq-cse-nand.dts
From: Quentin Schulz
The PX30-µQ7 (Ringneck) is a system-on-module featuring the Rockchip
PX30 in a micro Qseven-compatible form-factor.
PX30-µQ7 features:
* CPU: quad-core Cortex-A35
* DRAM: 2GB dual-channel
* eMMC: onboard eMMC
* SD/MMC
* TI DP83825I
From: Quentin Schulz
Sync the px30 dtsi from Linux kernel next-20221114.
Cc: Quentin Schulz
Reviewed-by: Kever Yang
Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz
---
arch/arm/dts/px30.dtsi | 28 +---
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git
From: Quentin Schulz
It is possible to boot U-Boot proper from a different storage medium
than the one used by the BOOTROM to load the SPL. This information is
stored in the u-boot,spl-boot-device Device Tree property and is
accessible from U-Boot proper so that it has knowledge at runtime where
From: Quentin Schulz
BOOTROM sets a bit in a CPU register so that the software can know from
where the first stage bootloader was booted. One use case for this is to
specify the default loading medium for U-Boot proper to match the one
used by the BOOTROM to load the SPL (same-as-spl in
From: Quentin Schulz
The IRAM on PX30 (or Int_MEM in datasheet) starts at 0xff0e and not
0xff02 as rightfully stated in the FIXME comment.
Let's fix it so that BROM_BOOTSOURCE_ID_ADDR points to the correct
address for PX30.
Fixes: 46281a76bee3 ("rockchip: add core px30 headers")
Cc:
From: Quentin Schulz
The PX30-uQ7 (Ringneck) SoM is a µQseven-compatible (40mmx70mm, MXM-230
connector) system-on-module from Theobroma Systems[1], featuring the
Rockchip PX30.
It provides the following feature set:
* up to 4GB DDR4
* up to 128GB on-module eMMC (with 8-bit 1.8V interface)
* SD
вт, 29 нояб. 2022 г. в 09:50, Neha Malcom Francis :
>
> EEPROM detection logic in ti_i2c_eeprom_get() involves figuring out
> whether addressing is 1-byte or 2-byte. There are currently different
> behaviours seen across boards as documented in commit bf6376642fe8
> ("board: ti: common:
cadence_qspi_apb_enable_linear_mode() has a weak function defined, so no
need to gaurd this under if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(ARCH_VERSAL)).
In cadence_qspi_apb_write_execute(), enable linear mode is called twice by
mistake, remove extra one.
Signed-off-by: Ashok Reddy Soma
---
On Mon, 28 Nov 2022 11:08:20 -0500
Sean Anderson wrote:
> On 11/26/22 11:59, Safae Ouajih wrote:
> > [You don't often get email from soua...@baylibre.com. Learn why this is
> > important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
> >
> > Android introduced boot header version 3 or 4.
>
From: Ashok Reddy Soma
Micron mt35 series octal flashes are under config option
CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_MT35XU. Enable it in default defconfig for octal
flashes to be detected.
Signed-off-by: Ashok Reddy Soma
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek
---
configs/xilinx_versal_net_virt_defconfig | 1 +
1 file
Hi Ilias,
On Tue, 29 Nov 2022 at 16:33, Ilias Apalodimas
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 09:45:07PM +0900, Masahisa Kojima wrote:
> > Some commands need to enumerate the existing UEFI load
> > option variable("Boot"). This commit transfers some code
> > from cmd/efidebug.c to
Hi Colinn
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 1:08 PM Dario Binacchi
wrote:
>
> Hi Colin,
>
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 5:35 PM Colin Foster
> wrote:
> >
> > The nand_spl_load_image function was guaranteed to read an entire block
> > into RAM, regardless of how many bytes were to be read. This is
> >
On 11/28/22 06:48, Samuel Holland wrote:
If the UART bus or baud clock has a gate, it must be enabled before the
UART can be used.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland
---
drivers/serial/ns16550.c | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/serial/ns16550.c
Tom, maybe it is better to change configs add ifdefs or do sth else to exclude
them from the build if IPV6 is not configured?
Thanks!
От: Vyacheslav Mitrofanov V
Отправлено: 29 ноября 2022 г. 11:35:13
Кому: Tom Rini
Копия: rfried@gmail.com;
Hello Tom!
I tested this problem and I think it is necessary to set CONFIG_IPV6.
Without that option tests fail.
Thanks!
От: Tom Rini
Отправлено: 28 ноября 2022 г. 18:34:58
Кому: Vyacheslav Mitrofanov V
Копия: rfried@gmail.com; joe.hershber...@ni.com;
46 matches
Mail list logo
