Hi Andre,
On 10/22/23 17:40, Andre Przywara wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Oct 2023 22:52:06 -0500
> Samuel Holland wrote:
>> On 9/28/23 16:54, Andre Przywara wrote:
>>> The Allwinner R528/T113-s/D1/D1s SoCs all share the same die, so use the
>>> same DRAM initialisation code.
>>> Make use of prior art here
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 12:55:34AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 10/22/23 23:55, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, 22 Oct 2023 at 07:59, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 10:29:22AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 08:08:11AM +0200, Heinr
On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 02:55:32PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 22 Oct 2023 at 07:59, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 10:29:22AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 08:08:11AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > > > On 10/21/23 20:26, Tom Rini wro
The sandbox should closely mimic other architectures.
Place each function or data in a separate section and let the linker
eliminate unused ones. This will reduce the binary size.
In the linker script mark that u_boot_sandbox_getopt are to be kept.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt
---
v2:
On 10/22/23 08:29, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
The sandbox should closely mimic other architectures.
Place each function or data in a separate section and let the linker
eliminate unused ones. This will reduce the binary size.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt
---
arch/sandbox/config.mk | 4
On 10/22/23 23:55, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 22 Oct 2023 at 07:59, Tom Rini wrote:
On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 10:29:22AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 08:08:11AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 10/21/23 20:26, Tom Rini wrote:
On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 08:43:08AM -0700
On Sat, 21 Oct 2023 22:52:06 -0500
Samuel Holland wrote:
Hi Samuel,
> On 9/28/23 16:54, Andre Przywara wrote:
> > The Allwinner R528/T113-s/D1/D1s SoCs all share the same die, so use the
> > same DRAM initialisation code.
> > Make use of prior art here and lift some code from awboot[1], which
>
Hi,
On Sun, 22 Oct 2023 at 07:59, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 10:29:22AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 08:08:11AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > > On 10/21/23 20:26, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 08:43:08AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>
The R-Car Gen3 SD_CLK_CTRL register does not use BIT(16) to implement
divider 1/1024, instead BIT(16) is reserved bit and divider 1/1024 is
not supported. The divider 1/1024 is specific to Socionext variant of
the IP, as is indicated by Linux commit:
0196c8db8363 ("mmc: tmio: move tmio_mmc_set_clo
On 10/22/23 19:08, Tom Rini wrote:
On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 06:34:08PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 10/22/23 17:55, Tom Rini wrote:
On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 10:47:33AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
Forward and backward compatibility of Linux kernel device-trees is
sometimes missing.
Hi Tom, Simon, Stefan,
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 12:14 AM Tony Dinh wrote:
>
> Hi Tom, Simon, Stefan,
>
> I have a few people waiting for these patches to get merged. So I hope
> you don't mind (I'm not sure about the merging schedule), I'd bug you
> guys about these patches. Wondering if these wil
From: Jan Kiszka
This was lost in refactoring while some users of the IOT2050 expect it
to work: Make sure that up to 3 USB storage devices are probed.
Fixes: 53873974a4b0 ("include: armv7: Enable distroboot across all configs")
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
Reviewed-by: Heinrich Schuchardt
---
C
On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 06:34:08PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 10/22/23 17:55, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 10:47:33AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> >
> > > Forward and backward compatibility of Linux kernel device-trees is
> > > sometimes missing. One solution appr
On 10/22/23 17:18, Jan Kiszka wrote:
From: Jan Kiszka
This was lost via 53873974a4b0 while some users of the IOT2050 expect it
to work: Make sure that up to 3 USB storage devices are probed.
Fixes: 53873974a4b0 ("include: armv7: Enable distroboot across all configs")
Signed-off-by: Jan Kis
On 10/22/23 17:55, Tom Rini wrote:
On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 10:47:33AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
Forward and backward compatibility of Linux kernel device-trees is
sometimes missing. One solution approach is to load a kernel specific
device-tree. This can either be done via a U-Boot scri
On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 10:47:33AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> Forward and backward compatibility of Linux kernel device-trees is
> sometimes missing. One solution approach is to load a kernel specific
> device-tree. This can either be done via a U-Boot scripts (like the one
> generated by
From: Jan Kiszka
This was lost via 53873974a4b0 while some users of the IOT2050 expect it
to work: Make sure that up to 3 USB storage devices are probed.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
---
include/configs/iot2050.h | 9 +
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/configs/iot2050
On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 10:29:22AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 08:08:11AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > On 10/21/23 20:26, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 08:43:08AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 19 Oct 2023 at 17:30, AKASH
On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 08:08:11AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 10/21/23 20:26, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 08:43:08AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Thu, 19 Oct 2023 at 17:30, AKASHI Takahiro
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 08:0
Forward and backward compatibility of Linux kernel device-trees is
sometimes missing. One solution approach is to load a kernel specific
device-tree. This can either be done via a U-Boot scripts (like the one
generated by Debian package flash-kernel or by a boot loader like GRUB.
The boot loader ap
20 matches
Mail list logo
