Dear Wolfgang Denk,
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear =?UTF-8?B?7J207Iq57ZiE?=,
In message fa2126d60911130006q3d5a1879pb177a51a4544f...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
flash_sect_erase() displays message Erased #N sectors even when
there are some protected sectors found and command erase fail.
flash_sect_erase() displays message Erased #N sectors even when
there are some protected sectors found and command erase fail.
Signed-off-by: Seunghyeon Rhee seunghy...@lpmtec.com
---
common/cmd_flash.c |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git
Fix stack_setup to place the stack on the correct address in DRAM
accroding to U-Boot standard and remove conditional compilation by
CONFIG_MEMORY_UPPER_CODE macro that is not necessry. This macro
was introduced and used only by this board for some unclear reason.
The definition of this macro is
Move the definitions of DRAM parameters from SoC description
(s3c6400.h) to board description (smdk6400.h). DRAM parameters
are rather board-specific than SoC specific. According to the
current source, one may have to change the definitions in
s3c6400.h in addition to creating the new board
F +82-2-6442-6462
M +82-10-2790-0657
Minkyu Kang 쓴 글:
Dear Seunghyeon Rhee,
2009/11/4 Seunghyeon Rhee (이승현) seunghy...@lpmtec.com:
Move the definitions of DRAM parameters from SoC description
(s3c6400.h) to board description (smdk6400.h). DRAM parameters
are rather board-specific than
Dear Minkyu Kang,
2009/11/2 Minkyu Kang proms...@gmail.com:
Dear Seunghyeon Rhee
2009/10/31 Seunghyeon Rhee (이승현) seunghy...@lpmtec.com:
stack_setup is modified to initialize the stack on the correct address in
DRAM accroding to the typical memory configuration described in
README
This patch turns off MAC address mismatch warning when
optional eeprom programmed with MAC address is not available.
In that case, smc911x's MAC address register has its default
value ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff and it's not a valid address. This
makes eth_initialize() show the warning which has no
stack_setup is modified to initialize the stack on the correct address in
DRAM accroding to the typical memory configuration described in
README and the related CONFIG_* macro definitions. This makes macro
CONFIG_MEMORY_UPPER_CODE no longer necessry. This was introduced
and used only by this board
There were two patches submitted to add support for SMSC LAN9220 and
LAN9221.
The latter (more recent one) has been applied but the former hasn't yet.
Refer to the
following and check please.
Regards,
Seunghyeon Rhee
Thu Apr 23 07:36:25 CEST 2009
Daniel Mack wrote:
Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack
9 matches
Mail list logo
