On 29.07.2021 15:59, Tom Rini wrote:
> Well yes, this is part of the question now, is there enough interest in
> the old version to bother with? The other part of the question is
> what's being built now that wasn't being built before, and is that a bug
> or a feature (a less CONFIG-dependent set
On 29.07.2021 02:43, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> Yes, true. And that's two 1-line if/else. That's a reasonable to me
> level of effort to keep supporting older hosts. Your patch is adding in
> 60 lines. I really do want to dig a bit more here.
For me, it doesn't matter how many lines of code were
On 29.07.2021 01:56, Tom Rini wrote:
> Part of the question is then, were you enabling the SSL-related parts
> before this change? Or did the way the code is now being
> enabled/disabled trigger this now being enabled when it wasn't before?
>
This commit broke the build:
On 28.07.2021 23:07, Tom Rini wrote:
> There is a fine line at least that I'm willing to walk in terms of
> supporting ancient OSes directly and also not making things overly
> complicated in our own tree. That said, openssl tends to be one of the
> ones where it does get hard to support old
to
`EC_GROUP_order_bits'
ecdsa-libcrypto.c:(.text+0x642): undefined reference to
`EC_POINT_get_affine_coordinates'
Signed-off-by: Artem Panfilov
---
lib/ecdsa/ecdsa-libcrypto.c | 80 -
1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/ecdsa/ecdsa
to
`EC_GROUP_order_bits'
ecdsa-libcrypto.c:(.text+0x642): undefined reference to
`EC_POINT_get_affine_coordinates'
Signed-off-by: Artem Panfilov
---
lib/ecdsa/ecdsa-libcrypto.c | 80 -
1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/ecdsa/ecdsa
6 matches
Mail list logo
