In the current source tree, in disk/part_efi.c , we see:
/*
* Problems with CONFIG_SYS_64BIT_LBA:
*
* struct disk_partition.start in include/part.h is sized as ulong.
* When CONFIG_SYS_64BIT_LBA is activated, lbaint_t changes from ulong
to uint64_t.
* For now, it is cast back to ulong at assi
Hello,
Does anyone in the community here have experience (first-hand,
preferably) & knowledge regarding the use of drives larger than 2.1TB?
It is my understanding that CONFIG_EFI_PARTITION and
CONFIG_SYS_64BIT_LBA both required - but is there anything else that
needs to be switched on?
Peculia
Hi folks,
I'm hoping that a few of you (perhaps Kirkwood users in particular)
can tell me of their own personal experiences (hopefully all good)
when using EFI/GPT partitions w/ U-Boot.
Does it work as advertised?
Is it just a matter of setting CONFIG_EFI_PARTITION in the config?
Any unexpected
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Daniel Stodden
wrote:
>>
>>
>> Have you tried to put the bootrom in the debug mode ?
>>
>> https://doukki.net/doku.php?id=wiki:tutoriels:u-boot.uart#boot_from_uart0
>>
>> Réfs :
>> http://www.marvell.com/embedded-processors/kirkwood/assets/FS_88F6180_9x_6281_OpenSou
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 4:23 PM, David Purdy wrote:
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:38 PM, Daniel Stodden
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 20:16 -0500, David Purdy wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Daniel Stodden
>>> >
>
> Will try out that short modi
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:38 PM, Daniel Stodden
wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 20:16 -0500, David Purdy wrote:
>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Daniel Stodden
>> >
>> > Hey.
>> >
>> > Unfortunately I only have a couple Buffalo boards and a Qnap, all
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Luka Perkov wrote:
> The kwboot program boots boards based on Marvell's Kirkwood platform
> via Xmodem over their integrated UART.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Stodden
> Acked-by: Luka Perkov
> ---
>
> Changes from version v1:
> * fix man page
> * minor cosmetic fi
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 1:38 AM, Albert ARIBAUD
wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
>
>
>
> Not my main area of expertise here, but I am not sure how this plays on
> Marvell non-kirkwood platforms (e.g., orion5x).
>
> ISTR it is not the first time we deal with the whole IDE number of bus /
> number of ports [ / u
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Luka Perkov wrote:
> IDE_BUS assumes that each bus has two devices and thus returns the first
> bus even when the second one should be probed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Baatz
> Tested-by: Luka Perkov
> ---
>
> Simon discovered this while adding support for new boa
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Luka Perkov wrote:
> Hi Simon! Hi Prafulla!
>
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 02:14:23AM -0700, Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
>> > #define IDE_BUS(dev) (dev / (CONFIG_SYS_IDE_MAXDEVICE /
>> > CONFIG_SYS_IDE_MAXBUS))
>> >
>> > in ide.h fixes the problem for me and detects both
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 2:41 AM, Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: David Purdy [mailto:david.c.pu...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 15 April 2012 00:54
>> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
>> Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar; albert.u.b...@aribaud.net
>
Hi Wolfgang, Prafulla, Albert & all,
Any chance to push this in 2012.04 release?
thanks, regards,
Dave
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 3:05 AM, Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Dave Purdy [mailto:david.c.pu...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 28 March 2012 07:31
>> To: u-boot@l
; Regards..
>
> Prafulla . . .
>
>
>
> ____
>
> From: David Purdy [mailto:david.c.pu...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 02 April 2012 17:04
> To: Prafulla Wadaskar
> Subject: Re: Marvell/Kirkwood: 6192 vs. 6281 - does U-Boot correctly
> distinguish between the two?
>
>
>
> Prafulla,
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Prafulla Wadaskar
wrote:
>
>
> I remember there was some delay issue on SATA, since processor in this
platform is running at lower clock, (may be) this could be one of parameter
to be considered.
> May be Albert can have some more inside on this.
>
> Regards..
> Pr
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 4:24 PM, David Purdy wrote:
> Problem w/ SATA/IDE on Kirkwood 88F6281 board:
>
>
To clarify, this is actually a _6192_ board. I double-checked, there are
no 6192 boards in include/configs/ .
The contents in arch/arm/arch-kirkwood/ certainly suggest that th
I've found either a bug, a "feature" or a misunderstanding of my own. I've
researched it before posting as much as I could, but since there are __no__
6192 Kirkwoods in mainline (AFAICS), there isn't much to compare to...
_Marvell's_ U-Boot running on a Pogoplug V4, with its 6192_A1 ... shows
t
Problem w/ SATA/IDE on Kirkwood 88F6281 board:
I've got U-Boot 2011.12 working well on a 8192 Kirkwood board, _except_ for
a nagging SATA problem.
Currently, it loads and executes U-Boot fine, it boots fine from a USB
drive, but I'm unable to get the SATA port to function correctly. Any
insight f
Hi Prafulla & all,
I understand that lower case hexadecimal for DATA lines is preferred for
kwbimage.cfg (in Kirkwood). For a mixed-upper-and-lower-case kwbimage.cfg
that is already in U-Boot, should I first submit a [PATCH][cosmetic] to
change it to all lower case DATA? Or should this sort of
r do you still have access to it?
Thank you, regards,
Dave
-- Forwarded message --
From: Dave Purdy
Date: Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 1:25 PM
Subject: [PATCH v4] kirkwood: add support for Cloud Engines Pogoplug E02
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Cc: David Purdy , prafu...@marvell.com,
al
Wadaskar wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: David Purdy [mailto:david.c.pu...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: 14 March 2012 23:32
> > To: Prafulla Wadaskar
> > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; albert.u.b...@aribaud.net
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kirkwood: add support for
Hi Prafulla,
You comments are very clear and helpful. I'll try to get the v3 patch
in sometime over the weekend.
thanks & regards,
Dave
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 3:12 AM, Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: David Purdy [mailto:david
D, 512MB RAM, Audio, USB, eSATA & other differences
Pogoplug E02 - 128MB NAND, 256MB RAM, USB
... actually it is probably closest to the Seagate Dockstar (which is
supported in U-Boot stable since 2010.12 IIRC), but there are enough
differences that the Dockstar's u-boot binary will not
Thank you, gentlemen, the patch worked a treat...
U-Boot 2011.12-00374-g54e9668-dirty (Mar 03 2012 - 11:08:23)
Pogoplug E02
SoC: Kirkwood 88F6281_A0
DRAM: 256 MiB
WARNING: Caches not enabled
NAND: 128 MiB
```
Dave
On Sat, Mar 3,
While finishing some work on support for a new machine, a build based
on the latest git, I see this:
...
U-Boot 2011.12-00374-g54e9668-dirty (Mar 02 2012 - 14:48:48)
Pogoplug E02
SoC: Kirkwood 88F6281_A0
DRAM: 256 MiB
WARNING: Caches not enabled
NAND: CONFIG_MTD_ECC_SOF
24 matches
Mail list logo
