Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote on 2010/10/22 19:06:14:
On Friday, October 22, 2010 12:40:07 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote on 2010/10/22 17:18:05:
On Friday, October 22, 2010 04:34:52 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Don't you want to know if the app screwed up
André Schwarz andre.schw...@matrix-vision.de wrote on 2010/10/22 21:25:34:
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 16:56 +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
André Schwarz andre.schw...@matrix-vision.de wrote on 2010/10/22
16:30:49:
Joakim,
your commit d1e0b10accdbac2e0a8b2cbf7c589645442f87c5 renders
Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote on 2010/10/22 19:36:33:
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 03:55:49 -0400
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Friday, October 22, 2010 03:37:43 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote on 2010/10/22 09:20:22:
On Friday, October 22, 2010 02:10:16
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote on 2010/10/21 21:51:53:
On Thursday, October 21, 2010 07:45:10 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Wolfgang Denk wrote on 2010/10/21 13:32:54:
Joakim Tjernlund you wrote:
- if ((long)bytes 0) return 0;
+ if ((long)bytes = 0) return 0;
I
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote on 2010/10/22 09:20:22:
On Friday, October 22, 2010 02:10:16 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote on 2010/10/21 21:51:53:
it is useful for malloc(0) == NULL. the glibc behavior is downright
obnoxious. we disable this for uClibc and dont
Reinhard Meyer u-b...@emk-elektronik.de wrote on 2010/10/22 09:18:02:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote on 2010/10/21 21:51:53:
On Thursday, October 21, 2010 07:45:10 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Wolfgang Denk wrote on 2010/10/21 13:32:54:
Joakim Tjernlund you
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote on 2010/10/22 09:55:49:
On Friday, October 22, 2010 03:37:43 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote on 2010/10/22 09:20:22:
On Friday, October 22, 2010 02:10:16 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
does not set errno which screws error handling. One have
André Schwarz andre.schw...@matrix-vision.de wrote on 2010/10/22
16:30:49:
Joakim,
your commit d1e0b10accdbac2e0a8b2cbf7c589645442f87c5 renders my MPC8377
based board unbootable.
Two weeks ago I got this after power on :
U-Boot 2010.09-00486-gfda6278-dirty (Oct 22 2010 -
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote on 2010/10/22 17:18:05:
On Friday, October 22, 2010 04:34:52 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Don't you want to know if the app screwed up or if the system is out
of memory?
The only upside to malloc(0) == NULL I can see is an extra check
for apps
Hello Albert,
Albert Aribaud wrote:
Wolfgang (and others who can/want),
Please test this patch; it should add a complete barrier to make
sure that all fixups are written to RAM before jumping there, and
that no remnants subsist of the old unfixed code in the instruction
paths.
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote on 2010/10/21 13:51:26:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message OFD5ABFC5E.96E88C93-ONC12577C3.00406E0E-C12577C3.
00408...@transmode.se you wrote:
It is legal for malloc() to return NULL in case of size==0,
and for the sake of simplicity I recommend we do
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote on 2010/10/21 14:02:39:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message OF9AD66E3F.36E9C654-ONC12577C3.004134FD-C12577C3.
0041a...@transmode.se you wrote:
Of course we could return some valid pointer like glibc does, i. e.
implement something like
The RAM relocated address is useful when debugging or there is u-boot
crash dump. So always print it instead of debug.
Signed-off-by: Roy Zang tie-fei.z...@freescale.com
Cc: Wood Scott-B07421 b07...@freescale.com
I use a similar patch here too so:
Acked-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl
From: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com, Kim
Phillips
kim.phill...@freescale.com
Cc: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
Date: 2010/10/13 23:12
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCHv3] mpc83xx: Add -fpic relocation
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message 4cbf4d17.6020...@free.fr you wrote:
Is the data cache on or off when you experience the issue? If it was
on,
DC is always off. DC on has always casued problems with lots of
drivers, including USB, so we never attempted doing that (except for
My board has a problem with this change. I added it manually to my tree
and
now it wont boot at all(only with BDI2000 connected).
It seems like my board uses the warm start vector at all times.
Padding with 4 nop's after the _start symbol fixes the problem.
It might be due to a somewhat peculiar
Peter Tyser pty...@xes-inc.com wrote on 2010/10/19 17:51:11:
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 12:07 +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
My board has a problem with this change. I added it manually to my
tree
and
now it wont boot at all(only with BDI2000 connected).
Just to clarify, it won't boot
Peter Tyser pty...@xes-inc.com wrote on 2010/10/19 20:39:41:
It seems like my board uses the warm start vector at all times.
Padding with 4 nop's after the _start symbol fixes the problem.
It might be due to a somewhat peculiar reset design but I cannot
understand
why. Does
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote on 2010/10/19 22:04:17:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message OFBC383CCF.86B567D6-ONC12577C1.006A80D5-C12577C1.
006aa...@transmode.se you wrote:
During normal use I thought that the reset entry point was always
0xX100 and a warm reset would never
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote on 2010/10/19 23:13:59:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message OF7EBFC833.2F0E9C3D-ONC12577C1.00737E7A-C12577C1.
0073e...@transmode.se you wrote:
There is one thing though: At address 0x100(and 0x110) we have a
branch to where the boot is really located
Dear Eric Cooper,
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 08:40:31PM -0400, Eric Cooper wrote:
I no longer see any of the early console messages that should result
from display_banner, print_cpuinfo, etc. The first thing I see is
the
NAND information:
[...]
But if I load the same u-boot image
Fix these warnings:
dlmalloc.c: In function 'free':
dlmalloc.c:2507: warning: dereferencing pointer '({anonymous})' does break
strict-aliasing rules
dlmalloc.c:2507: warning: dereferencing pointer '({anonymous})' does break
strict-aliasing rules
dlmalloc.c:2507: warning: dereferencing pointer
'({anonymous})' does break
strict-aliasing rules
Some
page(http://blog.worldofcoding.com/2010/02/solving-gcc-44-strict-aliasing-problems.html)
suggests adding __attribute__((__may_alias__)). Doing so makes the warnings go
away.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
Alexander Stein alexander.st...@systec-electronic.com wrote on
2010/10/14 08:50:29:
Hello,
On Thursday 14 October 2010, 08:41:20 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Fix these warnings:
dlmalloc.c: In function 'free':
dlmalloc.c:2507: warning: dereferencing pointer '({anonymous})' does
break
Wolfgang Denk schrieb:
Dear Reinhard Meyer,
In message 4cb6a110.6080...@emk-elektronik.de you wrote:
instead of adding or having the sequence of
malloc(), memset()
in all places where a definitely sane initialized structure
is required it would make more sense to introduce a
but it is not.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
---
arch/powerpc/cpu/74xx_7xx/start.S |4 +++-
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc512x/start.S |4 +++-
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc5xx/start.S |4 +++-
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc5xxx/start.S |4 +++-
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc8220/start.S |4
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote on 2010/10/14 11:38:57:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message OF32166834.809C7D71-ONC12577BC.0031112B-C12577BC.
00313...@transmode.se you wrote:
I would borrow the naming from linux and call it mallocz
... except that Linux does not use any mallocz
Albert ARIBAUD albert.arib...@free.fr wrote on 2010/10/13 08:30:33:
Le 12/10/2010 23:00, Joakim Tjernlund a écrit :
Yes, but the difference isn't really the arch. It is the -mrelocatable
flag that is the big difference.
Not only: obviously, implementing GOT relocation is not done
On 10/12/2010 11:30 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Le 12/10/2010 23:00, Joakim Tjernlund a écrit :
Yes, but the difference isn't really the arch. It is the
-mrelocatable
flag that is the big difference.
Not only: obviously, implementing GOT relocation is not done the same
on
both
Albert ARIBAUD albert.arib...@free.fr wrote on 2010/10/13 11:05:09:
Le 13/10/2010 09:07, Joakim Tjernlund a écrit :
Did you use -msingle-pic-base too with -fpic/-fPIC? This is what makes
a difference(together with -fpic). The most interesting size is
the total flash size IMHO. Reducing
3e7f3 u-boot
size with -mbss-plt -fpic -msingle-pic-base
text data bss dec hex filename
222091 658024228 252899 3dbe3 u-boot
Note: -msingle-pic-base is not supported upstarem yet.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
---
v2: Better commit
Kim Phillips kim.phill...@freescale.com wrote on 2010/10/12 21:54:10:
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 21:17:38 +0200
Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se wrote:
Yes, it is a simple symbol to add. I will do it twm if you don't
beat me to it. it would be nice if you could try what works
Here is the gcc patch I did to support -fpic with -mrelocatable
In case someone wants to try it out.
Jocke
From d8ff0b3f0b44480542eab04d1659f4368b6b09cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 10:34:50 +0200
Subject: [PATCH
Here is the -msingle-pic-base patch to gcc
in case anyone wants to try it.
Jocke
From b418def9575d6ea3698077888157ae52631e52f3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 12:45:39 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] PowerPC: Add msingle-pic-base
255987 3e7f3 u-boot
size with -mbss-plt -fpic -msingle-pic-base
text data bss dec hex filename
222091 658024228 252899 3dbe3 u-boot
Note: -msingle-pic-base is not supported upstream yet.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
---
v3:
- Make
Albert ARIBAUD albert.arib...@free.fr wrote on 2010/10/13 11:05:09:
Le 13/10/2010 09:07, Joakim Tjernlund a écrit :
Did you use -msingle-pic-base too with -fpic/-fPIC? This is what
makes
a difference(together with -fpic). The most interesting size is
the total flash size IMHO
This add relocation of .got entries produced
by -fpic. -fpic produces 2-3% smaller code and
is faster. Unfortunately gcc promotes -fpic to
-fPIC when -mrelocatable is used so one need a very
small patch to gcc too(sent upstream).
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote on 2010/10/12 14:52:18:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message
1286887081-23172-1-git-send-email-joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se you
wrote:
This add relocation of .got entries produced
by -fpic. -fpic produces 2-3% smaller code and
is faster. Unfortunately
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote on 2010/10/12 15:47:19:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message OF4DCFBD28.58E81A84-ONC12577BA.0047150B-C12577BA.
0047d...@transmode.se you wrote:
What happens when one uses this patch in combination with a
standard
(i. e. older, unpatched) GCC
Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote on 2010/10/12 17:52:58:
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 15:04:31 +0200
Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se wrote:
_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ is a predefined symbol that the linker defines
to
be in the middle of the -fpic GOT table. It marks the end
Kim Phillips kim.phill...@freescale.com wrote on 2010/10/12 19:31:25:
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:10:33 +0200
Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se wrote:
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote on 2010/10/12 15:47:19:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message OF4DCFBD28.58E81A84
Le 12/10/2010 19:11, Joakim Tjernlund a écrit :
Figured I should mention that I have added -msingle-pic-base(from ARM)
which
works nicely with -fpic(not sure if -fPIC is possible) and reduces
size
even more:
Since you seem to be following the same path as I did on ARM, I may
Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote on 2010/10/12 20:25:40:
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 13:19:38 -0500
Kim Phillips kim.phill...@freescale.com wrote:
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 19:41:56 +0200
Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se wrote:
Kim Phillips kim.phill...@freescale.com wrote
Kim Phillips kim.phill...@freescale.com wrote on 2010/10/12 20:19:38:
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 19:41:56 +0200
Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se wrote:
Kim Phillips kim.phill...@freescale.com wrote on 2010/10/12
19:31:25:
that moderate size increase in start.S breaks nand builds
Yes, it is a simple symbol to add. I will do it twm if you don't
beat me to it. it would be nice if you could try what works
and not though.
Could not wait, does this work for you?
diff --git a/nand_spl/board/freescale/mpc8313erdb/u-boot.lds
Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote on 2010/10/12 21:20:26:
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 21:13:19 +0200
Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se wrote:
Kim Phillips kim.phill...@freescale.com wrote on 2010/10/12
20:19:38:
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 19:41:56 +0200
Joakim Tjernlund
Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote on 2010/10/12 22:16:14:
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 21:51:44 +0200
Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se wrote:
Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote on 2010/10/12 21:20:26:
We do need to relocate with NAND SPL. We start in the NAND buffer
Albert ARIBAUD albert.arib...@free.fr wrote on 2010/10/12 22:37:54:
Le 12/10/2010 20:11, Joakim Tjernlund a écrit :
Le 12/10/2010 19:11, Joakim Tjernlund a écrit :
Figured I should mention that I have added -msingle-pic-base(from
ARM)
which
works nicely with -fpic(not sure if -fPIC
Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote on 2010/10/12 22:48:59:
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 22:40:27 +0200
Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se wrote:
Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote on 2010/10/12 22:16:14:
The link address is of the pre-relocation NAND buffer.
hmm
Kim Phillips kim.phill...@freescale.com wrote on 2010/10/12 21:54:10:
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 21:17:38 +0200
Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se wrote:
Yes, it is a simple symbol to add. I will do it twm if you don't
beat me to it. it would be nice if you could try what works
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote on 2010/10/04 23:10:31:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message OFF06E784F.A10A5A15-ONC12577B2.0065FB3C-C12577B2.
0066d...@transmode.se you wrote:
:), actually it wasn't that bad. Wolfgang nearly accepted the code even :)
Yes, I was really tempted because I do
Hi Wolfgang,
snip
Well, please keep in mind that all this code is working find on
PowerPC, which has been using relocation right from the beginning.
It is my understanding that we don't suffer from this issue any more
on PPC - Peter Tyser posted relocation fixup patches for PPC
Le 04/10/2010 09:36, Joakim Tjernlund a écrit :
However, I think we will loose the possibility to add link once, burn and
run anywhere
feature I impl. once(but it was at the time deemed to intrusive) if
we skip -fPIC and go for the linker -pie relocation.
On ARM at least, I don't think
Le 04/10/2010 10:57, Heiko Schocher a écrit :
./MAKEALL edminiv2 results:
text databssdechexfilename
141376 4388 16640 162404 27a64./u-boot (for GOT
reloc)
150160 3819 16640 170619 29a7b
Albert ARIBAUD albert.arib...@free.fr wrote on 2010/10/04 10:33:05:
Le 04/10/2010 10:28, Joakim Tjernlund a écrit :
Le 04/10/2010 09:36, Joakim Tjernlund a écrit :
However, I think we will loose the possibility to add link once, burn and
run anywhere
feature I impl. once
J. William Campbell jwilliamcampb...@comcast.net wrote on 2010/10/04
19:59:47:
On 10/4/2010 10:06 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear J. William Campbell,
In message 4ca9f294.8080...@comcast.net you wrote:
Yes, I think Wolfgang is correct. This is not going to be easy to do in
general. To run
Hello Reinhard,
Reinhard Meyer wrote:
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
I try to understand how the relocation process could handle pointers (to
functions or other data) in const or data sections.
Your code cannot know what is data and what is a pointer that needs
adjustment?
Best Regards,
Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote on 2010/09/13 21:21:33:
On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 09:19:34 +0200
Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se wrote:
Dear Ira W. Snyder,
In message 20100910181022.ga18...@ovro.caltech.edu you wrote:
Would you prefer a patch only
Dear Ira W. Snyder,
In message 20100910181022.ga18...@ovro.caltech.edu you wrote:
Would you prefer a patch only for the MPC8349EMDS, or should I try and
convert the other boards too? How should I know which boards are safe?
Grep for CONFIG_E300?
I think we should try and update all
Hi Ben,
[Jocke deleted from CC as this is not about the patch anymore]
But I still want to know what will happen to it. I didn't
send this patch to start another discussion :)
Jocke
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
Ben Warren biggerbadder...@gmail.com wrote on 2010/08/23 16:12:07:
Hi Jocke,
On Monday, August 23, 2010, Joakim Tjernlund
joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se wrote:
Ben Warren biggerbadder...@gmail.com wrote on 2010/08/23 09:08:17:
Hi Detlev,
On 8/13/2010 1:20 AM, Detlev Zundel wrote
The correct definition is in drivers/qe/uec.h so just
remove this one.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
---
include/netdev.h |1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/netdev.h b/include/netdev.h
index 882642a..65833e2 100644
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:44:21 +0200
Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se wrote:
uec_init() adds an udelay(10) even though
the PHY status read went well, don't do that.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
---
Acked-by: Kim Phillips kim.phill
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:44:22 +0200
Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se wrote:
This udelay looks bogus and doesn't help my board.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
---
This delay was introduced by ee62ed3286f83b98b7785e0318dc6379e78f7ff6
Kim Phillips kim.phill...@freescale.com wrote on 2010/08/12 07:17:49:
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:44:22 +0200
Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se wrote:
This udelay looks bogus and doesn't help my board.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
Detlev Zundel d...@denx.de wrote on 2010/08/13 10:20:46:
Hi Jocke,
Instead of always performing an autoneg, check if the PHY
already has a link and if it matches one of the requested
modes. Initially only 100MbFD is optimized this way.
Isn't it about time that we think about _not_
Kim Phillips kim.phill...@freescale.com wrote on 2010/08/12 07:17:49:
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:44:22 +0200
Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se wrote:
This udelay looks bogus and doesn't help my board.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
Detlev Zundel d...@denx.de wrote on 2010/08/12 14:58:47:
Hi Jocke,
Instead of always performing an autoneg, check if the PHY
already has a link and if it matches one of the requested
modes. Initially only 100MbFD is optimized this way.
Isn't it about time that we think about _not_
Hi,
We're contemplating a new embedded design based on the MPC8641. This design is
going to have the processor potentially running at two different clock
frequencies and therefore (or so we're told by Freescale) the memory will need
to run at different clock rates (same physical memory,
vapierfil...@gmail.com wrote on 2010/08/10 22:23:19:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Instead of always performing an autoneg, check if the PHY
already has a link and if it matches one of the requested
modes. Initially only 100MbFD is optimized this way.
wish
uec_init() adds an udelay(10) even though
the PHY status read went well, don't do that.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
---
drivers/qe/uec.c |4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/qe/uec.c b/drivers/qe/uec.c
index
This udelay looks bogus and doesn't help my board.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
---
This delay was introduced by ee62ed3286f83b98b7785e0318dc6379e78f7ff6
Kim, is this really needed for you?
drivers/qe/uec_phy.c |1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1
vapierfil...@gmail.com wrote on 2010/08/10 08:04:02:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 1:52 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Ben Warren wrote on 2010/08/09 22:54:10:
On 8/9/2010 1:18 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
The correct definition
The correct definition is in drivers/qe/uec.h so just
remove this one.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
---
include/netdev.h |1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/netdev.h b/include/netdev.h
index 882642a..65833e2 100644
Instead of always performing an autoneg, check if the PHY
already has a link and if it matches one of the requested
modes. Initially only 100MbFD is optimized this way.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
---
drivers/qe/uec_phy.c |9 +
1 files changed, 9
Dear Stefan,
In message 20100623131040.ga23...@frolo.macqel Philippe De Muyter wrote:
Hello Wolfgang list,
This is a revised patch, with comments and indentation fixed, I hope.
I have ported U-boot to a in house made board with Numonyx Axcell P33/P30
256-Mbit 65nm flash chips.
Philippe De Muyter p...@macqel.be wrote on 2010/08/09 14:57:27:
Hello Joakim,
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 10:32:25AM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Dear Stefan,
In message 20100623131040.ga23...@frolo.macqel Philippe De Muyter wrote:
Hello Wolfgang list,
This is a revised
The correct definition is in drivers/qe/uec.h so just
include that one instead.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
---
This is only compile tested on my board but hopefully
it will do. If not, I urge Freescale to clean up this mess.
include/netdev.h |4 +---
1
Ben Warren biggerbadder...@gmail.com wrote on 2010/08/09 22:54:10:
On 8/9/2010 1:18 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
The correct definition is in drivers/qe/uec.h so just
include that one instead.
... except that bleeds a ton of crap
Got this while trying to upgrade:
../../drivers/qe/uec.h:766: error: conflicting types for 'uec_initialize'
/usr/local/src/cutu2uboot/include/netdev.h:86: error: previous declaration of
'uec_initialize'
../../drivers/qe/uec.h:766: error: conflicting types for 'uec_initialize'
Commit qe: Pass in uec_info struct through uec_initialize
(8e55258f144764de8902e9f078a7ad4c6c022c2f)
changed the FSL UEC# numbering:
- sprintf(dev-name, FSL UEC%d, index);
+ sprintf(dev-name, FSL UEC%d, uec_info-uf_info.ucc_num);
from logical(zero based)to physical UCC number.
This
before i spent much time on this.
Also if anyone has already done similar implentation for any of the boards
let me know.
-Sagar
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Joakim Tjernlund
joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se wrote:
Sagar Heroorkar sagar.heroor...@gmail.com wrote on 2010/07/19 15:26:20:
Hi
.
Jocke
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Joakim Tjernlund
joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
wrote:
Sagar Heroorkar sagar.heroor...@gmail.com wrote on 2010/07/21 17:21:31:
Hi All,
Before i start using your ( Joakim )approach. I would like to get some tips
from Wolfgang or someone who
Dear Detlev Zundel,
In message m2vd9283ew@ohwell.denx.de you wrote:
Acked-by: Detlev Zundel d...@denx.de
thanks.
The only thing I wonder is the filename 'memcpy_mpc5200.c' as the code
doesn't really have any 5200 specifics in it. What about
As far as I understand this
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote on 2010/06/29 14:55:44:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message OFEB4E68BC.F6B8C9D0-ONC1257751.0045AE08-C1257751.
0045d...@transmode.se you wrote:
I could not come up with a better name... What is align32wrap
supposed to mean?
mpc5200_memcpy_fromio
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote on 2010/06/29 14:55:44:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message OFEB4E68BC.F6B8C9D0-ONC1257751.0045AE08-C1257751.
0045d...@transmode.se you wrote:
I could not come up with a better name... What is align32wrap
supposed to mean
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote on 2010/06/29 21:24:03:
Dear Steve Deiters,
In message 181804936abc2349be503168465576460f272...@exchserver.basler.com
you wrote:
I just posted a patch on the linuxppc-dev list that simply uses a
slightly modified version of memcpy to always keep the
Hi All,
Just a really quick message to say that I now have Linux Kernel 2.6.33 and
a JFFS2 Root File System up and running on my AMD SC520 board.
I big thanks to everyone for helping out on this 'little' project of mine.
There is no way I could have possibly gained so much personal
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 10:36:08 +0200, Peter Vollmer
pvollmer-u-b...@innominate.com wrote:
I then inserted 8 pairs of lwzu/stwu inside the loop to see when exactly
the problem occurs:
1: lwzur0,4(r8)
stwur0,4(r7)
lwzur0,4(r8)
stwur0,4(r7)
...
Peter Vollmer pvollmer-u-b...@innominate.com wrote on 2010/04/20 14:12:41:
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 11:57:09 +0200, Joakim Tjernlund
joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se wrote:
Probably a BDI2000 issue. If memory serves right BDI2000 flushes the
cache when it hits a BP.
Try this addin this to your
Michael Zaidman michael.zaid...@gmail.com wrote on 2010/04/16 18:44:12:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 1:25 AM, Kim Phillips
kim.phill...@freescale.com wrote:
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 10:37:08 +0200
Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se wrote:
Kim Phillips kim.phill...@freescale.com wrote
Michael Zaidman michael.zaid...@gmail.com wrote on 2010/04/16 18:44:12:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 1:25 AM, Kim Phillips
kim.phill...@freescale.com wrote:
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 10:37:08 +0200
Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se wrote:
Kim Phillips kim.phill
Hi Detlev,
I used iminfo 0xffdc and got following log
Image Name: Linux-2.6.31-LE
Image Type: PowerPC Linux Kernel Image (gzip compressed)
Data Size: 936145 Bytes = 914.2 kB
Load Address:
Entry Point:
Bad Data CRC
Here i am confused that
Kim Phillips kim.phill...@freescale.com wrote on 2010-04-08 10:27:03:
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 09:49:08 +0300
Michael Zaidman michael.zaid...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Joakim Tjernlund
joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se wrote:
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Timur Tabi
Detlev Zundel d...@denx.de wrote on 2010-04-08 12:00:05:
Hi Jocke,
Hi Detlev :)
To me it looks like the new code would indeed do a greedy
substitution
only stopping when no more substitutions can be done. This is very
un-unixy and thus not something I'd like to see as a
Detlev Zundel d...@denx.de wrote on 2010-04-08 18:06:40:
Hi Jocke,
Hi again :)
[...]
Since an escape char appear to exist, one should be able to use it much
like you
did above so I don't think that any use case disappears. Instead the common
usage
becomes simpler and the so far
Just started to look at reserving some RAM from u-boot and the kernel
and got a bit confused about what config options to use.
I found CONFIG_PRAM and CONFIG_SYS_MEM_TOP_HIDE and from what I can tell
one needs to set both to hide some memory from both u-boot and linux
but CONFIG_SYS_MEM_TOP_HIDE
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Timur Tabi timur.t...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Michael Zaidman
michael.zaid...@gmail.com wrote:
The version #2 of the patch is located here
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-April/069579.html
What is ppcDWstore(), and
Hi Nitin,
Hi!
I am doing env settings some thing like this,
ROOT1=/dev/mmcblk0p1
ROOT2=/dev/mmcblk0p2
ROOT=${ROOT1}
bootargs1=console=ttyS0,115200n8 mem=256M noinitrd rw rootdelay=1 ${ROOT}
when I say 'setenv bootargs ${bootargs1}', ${ROOT} gets resolved to 'ROOT1',
it does
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote on 2010-04-01 14:47:45:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message OFEBF95CA1.44E68372-ONC12576F8.0043F4F7-C12576F8.
0044d...@transmode.se you wrote:
linuxip=ip=$(ipaddr)::$(gatewayip):$(netmask):$(hostname):$(linuxif):off
tboot=setenv bootargs $(linuxroot
401 - 500 of 715 matches
Mail list logo
