[U-Boot] [PATCH] Dual-license IBM code contributions

project. IBM is dual-licensing the IBM code contributions already present in U-Boot under either the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2, or the original code license already present. Signed-off-by: Josh Boyer --- diff --git a/board/cray/L1/init.S b/board/cray/L1/init.S index

Re: [U-Boot] mkimage for ppc

On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 10:48:58AM -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote: >Sorry, was on vacation. Copying a couple mailing lists... > >On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 12:34 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: >> I am now doing regular build tests on various platforms (kernel only for >> now). > >That's great! Much appreciate

Re: [U-Boot] dtc/u-boot tool naming, "ftdump", "mkimage"

On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 02:11:22PM -0500, Jerry Van Baren wrote: > Hi Matt, > > Matt Sealey wrote: >> Josh Boyer wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:57:42AM -0600, Matt Sealey wrote: >>>> I just noticed (was told by an affiliate) that the DTC compiler &g

Re: [U-Boot] dtc/u-boot tool naming, "ftdump", "mkimage"

On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:57:42AM -0600, Matt Sealey wrote: > I just noticed (was told by an affiliate) that the DTC compiler tools > shares a tool name "ftdump" with the Freetype project. I was doing a > lazy packaging effort to get a few tools around so we can all be running > the same ver

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Introduce CONFIG_4xx_HAS_OPB

On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:33:03 +0200 Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Josh, > > On Thursday 09 October 2008, Josh Boyer wrote: > > The lib_ppc/board.c file will fill in the bi_opbfreq variable > > in the bd_t structure for PowerPC 4xx platforms. However, i

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Introduce CONFIG_4xx_HAS_OPB

for CPUs that have this defined. Signed-off-by: Josh Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/include/asm-ppc/u-boot.h b/include/asm-ppc/u-boot.h index 54ac01d..6673cd4 100644 --- a/include/asm-ppc/u-boot.h +++ b/include/asm-ppc/u-boot.h @@ -112,12 +112,14 @@ typedef struct b

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot and UBI

On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 08:34 +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 8:11 PM, Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tuesday 12 August 2008, Kyungmin Park wrote: > >> > On Monday 11 August 2008, Kyungmin Park wrote: > >> >> Actually the Samsung implemented the UBI supp

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Add simple IP/UDP fragmentation support

s and found that more than those 16KiB do not contribute much to the performance anymore. Therefor I limited the defragmentation buffer to 16KiB no too waste memory. Signed-off-by: Frank Haverkamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Josh Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- include/ne

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot and UBI

On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:18:53 +0900 "Kyungmin Park" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear Josh, > > First thank you for announcing UBI support on U-boot. > > Actually the Samsung implemented the UBI support on U-boot already and > has used it internally. The big difference is the code base. It's > ba

[U-Boot] U-Boot and UBI

Hi All, As has been stated before by various people, IBM has added some form of UBI support to an older version of U-Boot. While we would love to be able to forward port this to the latest version of U-Boot, we have simply not found the time and don't see that being the case in the near future.