ollow the existing defconfigs on rk3399.
>>
>> So, rename as followed with other rk3399 defconfigs.
>>
>> Cc: Levin Du
>> Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki
>> ---
>
> This strikes me as wrong, as the existing name is the actual name of the
> board.
>
> h
0
> +CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE=0x0100
> CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_RK3288=y
> -CONFIG_SPL_ROCKCHIP_BACK_TO_BROM=y
> CONFIG_TARGET_FIREFLY_RK3288=y
> CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS=1
> +CONFIG_SPL_SIZE_LIMIT=262144
> CONFIG_SPL_STACK_R_ADDR=0x8
> CONFIG_DEBU
.get_gpio_mux = rockchip_pinctrl_get_gpio_mux,
};
But I wonder why no other RK3399 boards experience the same problem. If I'd
like to write a patch to address this, a dummy request function is not proper
IMO. I'm seeking your advice. Thanks in advanc
3 matches
Mail list logo
