[U-Boot] [PATCH] watchdog: mx25: use the imx_watchdog driver for mx25

2018-07-21 Thread Martin Kaiser
From: Martin Kaiser The existing imx_watchdog driver is compatible with mx25 chipsets. Add a WDOG1_BASE_ADDR define for the base address and enable the driver in watchdog's Makefile. To use the driver, a board must define CONFIG_IMX_WATCHDOG and CONFIG_HW_WATCHDOG. This fixes an issue when

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3] mx25: fix the offset between the USB ports' registers

2018-07-16 Thread Martin Kaiser
From: Martin Kaiser The USBOH module on imx25 chips contains two USB controllers which are called USB OTG Controller and USB Host Controller. Each one has its EHCI root hub. The OTG Controller's EHCI registers start at offset 0, the Host Controller's registers start at offset 0x400. We set

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mx25: fix the offset between the USB ports' registers

2018-07-16 Thread Martin Kaiser
From: Martin Kaiser The USBOH module on imx25 chips contains two USB controllers which are called USB OTG Controller and USB Host Controller. Each one has its EHCI root hub. The OTG Controller's EHCI registers start at offset 0, the Host Controller's registers start at offset 0x400. We set

[U-Boot] [PATCH] mx25: fix the offset between the USB ports' registers

2018-07-13 Thread Martin Kaiser
From: Martin Kaiser The USBOH module on imx25 chips contains two USB controllers, which are called USB OTG Controller and USB Host Controller. Each one has its EHCI root hub. The OTG Controller's EHCI registers start at offset 0, the Host Controller's registers start at offset 0x400. We set

[U-Boot] [RESEND PATCH] tools: imximage: refactor header length calculations for imximage v1

2017-01-02 Thread Martin Kaiser
From: Martin Kaiser <mar...@kaiser.cx> We can use the same header length calculations for both imximage v1 and v2. This addresses TODO comments about imximage v1 in the current code. With this patch applied, *header_size_ptr in imximage_set_header() will have the correct value for both im

[U-Boot] [PATCH] tools: imximage: refactor header length calculations for imximage v1

2016-11-12 Thread Martin Kaiser
From: Martin Kaiser <mar...@kaiser.cx> We can use the same header length calculations for both imximage v1 and v2. This addresses TODO comments about imximage v1 in the current code. With this patch applied, *header_size_ptr in imximage_set_header() will have the correct value for both im

Re: [U-Boot] [Resend PATCH] tools: imximage: use 'new style' header length for imximage v1

2016-10-30 Thread Martin Kaiser
Thus wrote Martin Kaiser (li...@kaiser.cx): > Resending this patch after one month of silence. Is there anything I can do to > get this reviewed? My tests haven't shown any problems so far. I just saw that the patch doesn't apply to master any more. I'll check this and send an updated v

[U-Boot] [Resend PATCH] tools: imximage: use 'new style' header length for imximage v1

2016-10-30 Thread Martin Kaiser
From: Martin Kaiser <mar...@kaiser.cx> We can use the same mechanism for the imximage v1 header length calculations that we're using for v2. Doing so, we can share more code between v1 and v2. Additionally, *header_size_ptr in imximage_set_header() will then have the correct value for b

[U-Boot] [PATCH] tools: imximage: use 'new style' header length for imximage v1

2016-09-26 Thread Martin Kaiser
From: Martin Kaiser <mar...@kaiser.cx> We can use the same mechanism for the imximage v1 header length calculations that we're using for v2. Doing so, we can share more code between v1 and v2. Additionally, *header_size_ptr in imximage_set_header() will then have the correct value for b