Sorry forget about this, wrong mailing list !
Am 26.02.2024 um 11:36 schrieb Michael Lawnick:
> Hi group,
>
> hope you can help me:
> I have modules pci_fpga.c and pci_fpga_emul.c with same functions in
> them but different implementation, one for the real device, the other
> o
Hi group,
hope you can help me:
I have modules pci_fpga.c and pci_fpga_emul.c with same functions in
them but different implementation, one for the real device, the other
one is an emulation.
What I now want is being able to include one of both versions through
build command. I started with this:
Am 13.01.2023 um 15:52 schrieb Heinrich Schuchardt:
On 1/13/23 14:47, Michael Lawnick wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to printf-debug EFI execution triggered by Linux call.
Specifically I remove a persistent variable via Linux console and want
to follow execution. Without any printf() this works fine
Hi,
I am trying to printf-debug EFI execution triggered by Linux call.
Specifically I remove a persistent variable via Linux console and want
to follow execution. Without any printf() this works fine. I need this
to refine existing implementation of saving variables to SPI flash.
While printf()
Hi Simon,
having absolutely no knowledge about the details here just 2 cents:
It looks like concurrent run of multiple cores. Are you sure that all
cores beside #0 are properly caught and blocked on start?
KR
Michael
Am 07.02.2022 um 16:38 schrieb Simon Glass:
Hi,
I am trying to run the SPL
Am 16.09.2021 um 11:37 schrieb AKASHI Takahiro:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 11:14:01AM +0200, Michael Lawnick wrote:
Am 16.09.2021 um 10:02 schrieb AKASHI Takahiro:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 09:48:07AM +0200, Michael Lawnick wrote:
Am 16.09.2021 um 09:15 schrieb Michael Lawnick:
- What is the
Am 16.09.2021 um 10:02 schrieb AKASHI Takahiro:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 09:48:07AM +0200, Michael Lawnick wrote:
Am 16.09.2021 um 09:15 schrieb Michael Lawnick:
Am 16.09.2021 um 09:12 schrieb AKASHI Takahiro:
Please, as Heinrich suggested, add CONFIG_FS_FAT, in your U-Boot configuration
Am 16.09.2021 um 09:15 schrieb Michael Lawnick:
Am 16.09.2021 um 09:12 schrieb AKASHI Takahiro:
Please, as Heinrich suggested, add CONFIG_FS_FAT, in your U-Boot configuration.
Hmm, I didn't understand that as a suggestion, but as a question for his
understanding. Of course I'll giv
Am 16.09.2021 um 09:12 schrieb AKASHI Takahiro:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 05:06:09PM +0200, Michael Lawnick wrote:
Am 15.09.2021 um 13:36 schrieb Michael Lawnick:
Am 15.09.2021 um 13:22 schrieb Heinrich Schuchardt:
Am 15. September 2021 12:54:06 MESZ schrieb Michael Lawnick :
Am 15.09.2021
Am 15.09.2021 um 13:36 schrieb Michael Lawnick:
Am 15.09.2021 um 13:22 schrieb Heinrich Schuchardt:
Am 15. September 2021 12:54:06 MESZ schrieb Michael Lawnick :
Am 15.09.2021 um 12:42 schrieb Heinrich Schuchardt:
Could you, please send the complete output starting with 'bootefi sel
Am 15.09.2021 um 13:22 schrieb Heinrich Schuchardt:
Am 15. September 2021 12:54:06 MESZ schrieb Michael Lawnick :
Am 15.09.2021 um 12:42 schrieb Heinrich Schuchardt:
Could you, please send the complete output starting with 'bootefi selftest'.
ASIM-CN10KAS> setenv efi_selftest
Am 15.09.2021 um 12:42 schrieb Heinrich Schuchardt:
Could you, please send the complete output starting with 'bootefi selftest'.
ASIM-CN10KAS> setenv efi_selftest block device
ASIM-CN10KAS> bootefi selftest
Testing EFI API implementation
Selected test: 'block device'
Setting up 'block devic
Am 14.09.2021 um 17:57 schrieb Heinrich Schuchardt:
On 9/14/21 4:56 PM, Michael Lawnick wrote:
Hi,
in our environment we get error on efi_selftest if one of several SSD
partitions isn't properly initialized (due to some other error, but
that's a different topic). I tried to track dow
Hi,
in our environment we get error on efi_selftest if one of several SSD
partitions isn't properly initialized (due to some other error, but
that's a different topic). I tried to track down to where the partitions
get registered for test but got a bit lost so I request advice from you.
Shouldn'
Nobody interested or is subject formatting wrong so it slips through all
filters?
Am 23.11.2020 um 14:23 schrieb Michael Lawnick:
Hi,
before starting to walk the troublesome way on my own:
Is there any development for EFI_SPI, EFI_I2C and/or EFI_PCI ongoing?
I will have to write an EFI
Hi,
before starting to walk the troublesome way on my own:
Is there any development for EFI_SPI, EFI_I2C and/or EFI_PCI ongoing?
I will have to write an EFI application that needs access to devices on
these buses. So I try to find the path with lowest harm.
KR
Michael Lawnick
Am 04.09.2017 um 12:46 schrieb Ran Wang:
...
arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/Kconfig | 6 ++
arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/soc.c| 24 ++
...
Maybe I'm a bit pedentatic, but this doesn't sound for ARMv8 but for
fsl-layerscape patch ...
--
On systems where U-Boot is linked to another address than it really lays
(e.g. backup image), calls via function pointers must be fixed with a
'+= gd->reloc_off'.
This was not done for none_compr in ubifs_compressors_init() what leads
to system crash on ubifsmount command.
Signed-of
Michael Lawnick said the following:
> On systems where U-Boot is linked to another address than it really lays
> (e.g. backup image), calls via function pointers must be fixed with a
> '+= gd->reloc_off'.
> This was not done for none_compr in ubifs_compressors_init() wha
On systems where U-Boot is linked to another address than it really lays
(e.g. backup image), calls via function pointers must be fixed with a
'+= gd->reloc_off'.
This was not done for none_compr in ubifs_compressors_init() what leads
to system crash on ubifsmount command.
Signed-of
rudresh said the following:
[quoting repaired]
> Michael Lawnick wrote:
>>
>> rudresh said the following:
>>> i'm using u-boot -1.3.0 in MPC8313 evaluation board, it having a NAND ,
>>> NOR
>>> Flash , u-boot stored in NOR flash. when i do the saveen
rudresh said the following:
> i'm using u-boot -1.3.0 in MPC8313 evaluation board, it having a NAND , NOR
> Flash , u-boot stored in NOR flash. when i do the saveenv , reset command
> the u-boot is erased. i'm not able to fix this issue. help me to fix this
> issue
Sounds U-Boot and environment
Alemao said the following:
> return Z_MEM_ERROR;
>
>
> Any ideas why this is happening?
Out of memory.
You don't tell us processor architecture/type. In my case (PPC, u-boot
1.3.3 ff) I'd take a look into include/configs/.h and would
increase the constant CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_LEN
HTH
-
Steven Zedeck said the following:
> For example, I'm having problems understanding what this means in a
> Makefile:
>
> COBJS-$(CONFIG_HAS_DATAFLASH) += at45.o
> COBJS-$(CONFIG_FLASH_CFI_DRIVER) += cfi_flash.o
> COBJS-$(CONFIG_HAS_DATAFLASH) += dataflash.o
> COBJS-$(CONFIG_FLASH_CFI_LEGACY) += jed
Sriram Chadalavada said the following:
> My mistake Wolfang. Will not happen again. Although I am not sure why I am
> not able to access the newsgroup from Thunderbird.
>
> I am using the free news server nntp.aioe.org. Anyone else using thunderbird
> to access the newsgroup??
Subscribe to news.g
ce, but when you talk about 'mapping' the
word 'cache' is coming to my mind. Any chance that you have not disabled
caching for flash access address space?
--
Michael Lawnick
Software Design Engineer
Lise-Meitner-Str. 7/1
89081 Ulm
Tel: +49 731 9533 2066
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
htt
Joakim Tjernlund said the following:
> On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 13:31 +0100, Michael Lawnick wrote:
>> Could we modify this declaration to my non-static version in the trunk?
>
> Is this on PPC? If so it is due to missing fixup support. Grant Likely
> once sent a patch fixing th
Michael Lawnick said the following:
...
> - output of access rights is still corrupted, e.g.:
> d-ÿÿ-ÿ0 Tue Oct 21 11:08:17 2008 10
> --ÿÿ-ÿ 262144 Thu Jan 01 00:00:33 1970 u-boot.bin
> d-ÿÿ-ÿ0 Tue Oct 21 11:08:32 2008 1
> d-ÿÿ-ÿ0 Tue
Ilya Yanok said the following:
> Hello Michael,
>
> Michael Lawnick wrote:
...
>> d) output of 'ls' is corrupted: no date and access right output,
>> directories in / are shown multiple times
>
> Can you please be more specific on this? Is this with
> CFG_
}
- put_fl_mem(jNode);
+ if (pL->readbuf == NULL)
+ put_fl_mem(jNode, NULL);
}
#endif
c) I found no improvement with CFG_JFFS2_SORT_FRAGMENTS set (the way I
detected b) ;-)
d) output of 'ls' is corrupted: no da
Ilya Yanok said the following:
> As we moved data_crc() invocation from jffs2_1pass_build_lists() to
> jffs2_1pass_read_inode() data_crc is going to be calculated on each
> inode access. This patch adds caching of data_crc() results. There
> is no significant improvement in speed (because of flash
Joakim Tjernlund transmode.se> writes:
> Can't remember, possibly it was a hack.
>
Seems so. I tried to put it in my 1.3.3, but 'ls' never returns :-(
So I will wait for Detlev Zundel.
Michael
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://l
Detlev Zundel schrieb:
>> Has anybody tried to (and succeeded in) speed up u-boot?
>
> We are currently working on such a speedup bringing U-Boot up to par
> with Linux. I am confident that we can post our results in the next
> week.
>
Sounds promising!
> PS: Wow, message-mode in Emacs wants a
Joakim Tjernlund transmode.se> writes:
> > Has anybody tried to (and succeeded in) speed up u-boot?
>
> Yes, there was an attempt some time ago(months or a year, dunno) where
> someone had improved scanning dramatically, patch was posted to the
> u-boot list. Can't remember who though.
Seems to
Joakim Tjernlund transmode.se> writes:
>
> On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 08:45 +, Michael Lawnick wrote:
> > Hi *,
> >
> > please feel free to correct me if I tell sh**:
> > As far as I was told, bad JFFS2 boot performance of u-boot is result of not
> > s
Hi *,
please feel free to correct me if I tell sh**:
As far as I was told, bad JFFS2 boot performance of u-boot is result of not
supporting summary. (Because there is no JFFS2 but only JFFS support?)
So my question:
Has anybody done or is planning in next time (~weeks) to add summary support for
Stefan Roese denx.de> writes:
>
> On Friday 19 September 2008, Michael Lawnick wrote:
> > > BTW: Which NOR FLASH driver are you using? The common CFI driver? It has
> > > no real connection to the MTD layer which is needed for the UBI port from
> > >
Stefan Roese denx.de> writes:
>
> On Friday 19 September 2008, Michael Lawnick wrote:
> > how far have you got?
> > We are planning to integrate UBI in u-boot too (NOR flashes), so if all is
> > already done - or will be in next time - we could spare some hours ...
Kyungmin Park infradead.org> writes:
>
> It's preparation for UBI codes.
> UBI uses partition and get & put mtd devices
>
...
Hi,
how far have you got?
We are planning to integrate UBI in u-boot too (NOR flashes), so if all is
already done - or will be in next time - we could spare some hours
39 matches
Mail list logo
