for SD card (working)
add voltage regulator for SDHC/SDXC SD cards (not yet tested)
add config for EMMC flash (working)
Signed-off-by: Peter Vollmer
---
arch/arm/dts/armada-3720-espressobin.dts | 49 +---
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/dts
activate MMC_BROKEN_CD because drivers/mmc/mvebu_mmc.c does not
yet follow the driver model, so the card detection GPIO is not polled.
activate network switch, tested with bootp and random MAC generation
Signed-off-by: Peter Vollmer
---
configs/mvebu_espressobin-88f3720_defconfig | 4 +++-
1
on the devicetree
differences with the Marvell-hosted u-boot-marvell git repository at
https://github.com/MarvellEmbeddedProcessors/u-boot-marvell
Also tested on top of current u-boot-marvell custodian.
Peter Vollmer (2):
arm64: armada-37xx: dts: sync armada-3720-espressobin.dts with
u-boot
for SD card (working)
add voltage regulator for SDHC/SDXC SD cards (not yet tested)
add config for EMMC flash (working)
Signed-off-by: Peter Vollmer
---
arch/arm/dts/armada-3720-espressobin.dts | 49 +---
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/dts
activate MMC_BROKEN_CD because drivers/mmc/mvebu_mmc.c does not
yet follow the driver model, so the card detection GPIO is not polled.
activate network switch, tested with bootp and random MAC generation
Signed-off-by: Peter Vollmer
---
configs/mvebu_espressobin-88f3720_defconfig | 4 +++-
1
on the devicetree
differences with the Marvell-hosted u-boot-marvell git repository at
https://github.com/MarvellEmbeddedProcessors/u-boot-marvell
Also tested on top of current u-boot-marvell custodian.
Peter Vollmer (2):
arm64: armada-37xx: dts: sync armada-3720-espressobin.dts with
u-boot
can see the 4kb bootblock from the first NAND page correctly mapped to
0xfff0.
Could anybody give me a clue whats happening here ? Could it be a cache
related problem, or wrong RAM timing settings?
Thanks and best regards
--
Peter Vollmer
Innominate Security Technologies AG
Berlin
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 10:36:08 +0200, Peter Vollmer
pvollmer-u-b...@innominate.com wrote:
I then inserted 8 pairs of lwzu/stwu inside the loop to see when exactly
the problem occurs:
1: lwzur0,4(r8)
stwur0,4(r7)
lwzur0,4(r8)
stwur0,4(r7)
...
lwzu
the
exception traps in the spl bootloader ?
--
Peter Vollmer
Innominate Security Technologies AG
Berlin / Germany
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
--
Peter Vollmer
Innominate Security Technologies AG
Berlin / Germany
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
will be
loaded twice, but who cares?
Thanks a lot, that really helped me.
--
Peter Vollmer
Innominate Security Technologies AG
Berlin / Germany
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
insight best regards
--
Peter Vollmer
Innominate Security Technologies AG
Berlin / Germany
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
should have a valid clock. But somehow it seems to me
as if the core is not ticking ... any ideas why and how to solve this ?
Any help is very much appreciated.
Best regards
--
Peter Vollmer
Innominate Security Technologies AG
Berlin / Germany
bdi.cnf
Description: Binary data
rename_CFG_ENV_to_CONFIG_ENV_myBoard.patch, so I
would like to put it directly after above commit, so u-boot compiles
before and after these two patches during the bisect process.
But I already managed to do it using git merge. Thanks for your help and
sorry for the confusion :)
Best Regards
--
Peter Vollmer
Software
rebasing run git rebase --abort.
~/uboot$ git rebase --abort
I also tried git version 1.6.0.3 with the same result.
Any idea what the problem might be ?
Thanks
Peter
--
Peter Vollmer
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman
if thats the normal behaviour of git-rebase, usually it
worked for
me like that. But then I never tried it with a complete upstream repository
before.
I guess I try without the rebase and just use git merge into a new
branch, which
should work without a problem.
Thanks
--
Peter Vollmer
16 matches
Mail list logo