ts(" ")
call at the beginning of the function, ECC generation is finished VERY
quickly. What influence could adding the puts() call possibly have on
the speed of generating ECC values in DDR?
Kind regards,
Wouter Eckhardt.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this email, including a
I'll give it a whirl. I'll also look
into the other ECC initialization.
I actually thought ECC initialization was only done in sdram.c (after a
quick search for CONFIG_SDRAM_ECC). That probably also answers your next
question. My SDRAM initialization is the same one as is used for
do to speed up this ECC initialization? Have I forgotten
something when I try to enable the D cache? Any suggestions are welcome.
Kind regards,
Met vriendelijke groet,
Wouter Eckhardt
Engineer
wouter.eckha...@prodrive.nl
tel. +31 40 2676187
Prodrive B.V.
Postbus 28030
5602 JA Eindhoven
Ekkersrijt
> -Original Message-
> From: Wolfgang Denk [mailto:w...@denx.de]
> Sent: woensdag 26 augustus 2009 15:38
> To: Wouter Eckhardt
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Custom PPC440GX board: "Unsupported relocation
> error"
>
> De
return 0;
}
I'm not really sure what went wrong here. Google tells me that this is
usually related to incorrect assembler sequences. Am I missing some
compiler settings?
Thanks in advance!
Met vriendelijke groet,
Kind regards,
Wouter Eckhardt
Engineer
wouter.eckha...@prodrive.nl
tel. +31
Hi Stefan,
Thanks for the quick reply.
> On Thursday 23 July 2009 20:39:44 Wouter Eckhardt wrote:
> > I'm working on trying to get VxWorks to boot on a PPC440GX processor
> > using U-Boot, using an ALPR board. In order to boot VxWorks properly
(it
> > expects caching o
---
15 : 00 1KB -0 -> 0_0000 U: ----- --
ALPR>
Thanks in advance!
Met vriendelijke groet,
With kind regards,
Wouter Eckhardt
Engineer
wouter.eckha...@prodrive.nl
tel. +31 40 2676187
Prodrive B.V.
Postbus 28030
5602 JA Eindhoven
Ekkersrijt 5025
5692 EB Son
The Netherland
7 matches
Mail list logo