[U-Boot] Fw: Re: Re: [PATCH] add u-boot sj a1000/can support

Hi mike, It seems there's a big difference between my current project and u-boot common usage. I can only enjoy the patch myself now i want to get a packet from usb/network, then redirect it to can bus. So blocked write/read of can is not allowed. On Monday 26 October 2009 00:48:39 miaofng wrote

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] add u-boot sja1000/can support

It seems there's a big difference between my current project and u-boot common usage. I can only enjoy the patch myself now i want to get a packet from usb/network, then redirect it to can bus. So blocked write/read of can is not allowed. what's wrong with receiving data over

Re: [U-Boot] Fw: Re: Re: [PATCH] add u-boot sja1000/can support

Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: miaofng wrote: Hi mike, It seems there's a big difference between my current project and u-boot common usage. I can only enjoy the patch myself now Yes, can you describe your use-case. CAN in U-BOOT, so far, was just used to send or receive one or a few

Re: [U-Boot] CAN console

Wolfgang Denk wrote: Is there any chance that the stuff posted by miaofng will be available in u-boot-next? I'm not really sure. As Wolfgang Grandegger already commented, the implementation is really heavy for a mere boot loader. Sharing code with Linux is generally a good thing

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] add u-boot sja1000/can support

board. On Saturday 24 October 2009 00:17:50 miaofng wrote: From 1f6aaba856fbf484c442eb33cf220774d57fba8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: miaofng miao...@gmail.com Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:06:50 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] [can] add u-boot sja1000/can support this should be split into two patches -- one

[U-Boot] [PATCH] add u-boot sja1000/can support

From 1f6aaba856fbf484c442eb33cf220774d57fba8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: miaofng miao...@gmail.com Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:06:50 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] [can] add u-boot sja1000/can support Signed-off-by: miaofng miao...@gmail.com --- Makefile |1 + drivers/can/Makefile