Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 17/21] arm: Implement the 'fake' go command

I try enabling this config... --vb #ifdef CONFIG_BOOTSTAGE_REPORT bootstage_report(); @@ -225,12 +232,13 @@ static void boot_prep_linux(bootm_headers_t *images) } /* Subcommand: GO */ -static void boot_jump_linux(bootm_headers_t *images) +static void boot_jump_linux

Re: [U-Boot] 460GT PCIe configuration

error reporting mechanism, but we have to do with what we have to do :-) cheers, /vb On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 5:42 PM, vb v...@vsbe.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 7:03 AM, Stefan Roese s...@denx.de wrote: On Tuesday 13 January 2009, vb wrote: I have several different targets

[U-Boot] troubles trying to build glacier image

I am trying to build a kernel image for the AMCC glacier board, using the latest denx linux kernel vv linux-2.6-denx 128 git show commit 5a7b6e7d15253c01ee0f0b8846b78e2ca23ef40d Merge: 2f9f8f1... ae04d14... Author: Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de Date:

Re: [U-Boot] 460GT PCIe configuration

On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 7:03 AM, Stefan Roese s...@denx.de wrote: On Tuesday 13 January 2009, vb wrote: The CONFIG_SYS_PCIE0_XCFGBASE constant (and its counterparts for other PCIe ports) is defined and used in the code, and gets a TLB entry assigned, but I can't find a place where

[U-Boot] 460GT PCIe configuration

Stefan et al, I am trying to troubleshoot a weird PCIe problem on a PPC460GT based target, and it is getting curiouser and curiouser. There is a tlb overlap I mentioned in an earlier email; on top of that there are some things happening in cpu/ppc4xx/4xx_pcie.c which I also find hard to

[U-Boot] PPC460GT Canyonlands tlb table overlap?

The Canyonland board's init.s file (board/amcc/canyonlands/init.S) defines the contents of the TLB table for that target, it has these two records in the table among others: tlbentry(CFG_PCI_BASE, SZ_256M, 0x, 0xC, AC_R|AC_W|SA_G|SA_I)

[U-Boot] Handling different ethernhet phys on the same system.

Hello Ben, I am trying to port u-boot on a system which deploys two different types of ethernet PHYs, and don't see a good way of doing it with the current sw structure. There are concurrent implementations for supporting different PHYs, and it looks like quite often bringing in a new etherent

Re: [U-Boot] reinitialize peripherals

that on ppc460 (I am not sure if 440gx is the same, but it might be) the addresses of the peripherals driven by CSs have nonzero nibble in four MSBs of the 36 bit address, so phys_addr_t is 64 bits in size. good luck. /vb any insights welcome. thanks

Re: [U-Boot] TFTP images larger than 16MB causing MachineCheck on 405ex

I am not sure how much this is related, but it is a known problem that older tftp servers can't serve files larger than 16Mbytes in size. hth, /vb On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 12:57 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have been searching the web, but I have not seen any mention of this kind of problem

Re: [U-Boot] Changing u-boot relocation scheme

quot;006792"; google_color_text = "00"; //--> Re: [U-Boot] Changing u-boot relocation scheme vb Reply via email to <!-- google_ad_client = "pub-7266757337600734"; google_alternate_ad_url = "