On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 11:41:21AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> please pull these 3 fixes to your tree. It is one uefi dox fix.
> And 2 spi patches are fixing single mode for zynqmp boards.
>
> Thanks,
> Michal
>
> The following changes since commit 94509b79b13e69c209199af0757afbde8
Hi Tom,
please pull these 3 fixes to your tree. It is one uefi dox fix.
And 2 spi patches are fixing single mode for zynqmp boards.
Thanks,
Michal
The following changes since commit 94509b79b13e69c209199af0757afbde8d2ebd6d:
btrfs: Use default subvolume as filesystem root (2021-09-01 10:11:24
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 01:00:09PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> please pull these patches to your tree. Gitlab CI is not showing any
> issue and I have also tested qspi/sd flows on zynq and zynqmp boards.
>
> There are a lot of fixes and alignments with also some features like
> rtc/
Hi Tom,
please pull these patches to your tree. Gitlab CI is not showing any
issue and I have also tested qspi/sd flows on zynq and zynqmp boards.
There are a lot of fixes and alignments with also some features like
rtc/soc drivers and correcting capsule update. Code for multi_fit is
also added b
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 05:56:22PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> please pull the following changes to your tree. I am expecting some
> other enhancements to sdhci driver which have been sent by Ashok but I
> don't want to delay these changes to come to tree and start to be tested.
> Gi
Hi Tom,
please pull the following changes to your tree. I am expecting some
other enhancements to sdhci driver which have been sent by Ashok but I
don't want to delay these changes to come to tree and start to be tested.
Gitlab CI doesn't show any issue.
Thanks,
Michal
The following changes sinc
On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 11:25:22AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please pull these patches to your tree (next). There are a lot of DT
> syncup changes which are also going to Linux kernel.
> CI loop doesn't show any problem.
>
> BTW: Isn't there any option in CI not to run builds against
Hi,
please pull these patches to your tree (next). There are a lot of DT
syncup changes which are also going to Linux kernel.
CI loop doesn't show any problem.
BTW: Isn't there any option in CI not to run builds against the same
sha1? Because I see build for the branch itself and then for the tag
8 matches
Mail list logo