Re: [PATCH][RFC] image: fdt: Fix DT relocation handling with multiple DRAM banks with gap

On 3/12/22 06:02, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Marek, On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 at 19:41, Marek Vasut wrote: On 3/12/22 03:24, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Marek, On Wed, 21 Jul 2021 at 18:05, Marek Vasut wrote: The current implementation of boot_relocate_fdt() places DT at the highest usable DRAM address,

Re: [PATCH][RFC] image: fdt: Fix DT relocation handling with multiple DRAM banks with gap

Hi Marek, On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 at 19:41, Marek Vasut wrote: > > On 3/12/22 03:24, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Marek, > > > > On Wed, 21 Jul 2021 at 18:05, Marek Vasut wrote: > >> > >> The current implementation of boot_relocate_fdt() places DT at the > >> highest usable DRAM address, which is calcu

Re: [PATCH][RFC] image: fdt: Fix DT relocation handling with multiple DRAM banks with gap

On 3/12/22 03:24, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Marek, On Wed, 21 Jul 2021 at 18:05, Marek Vasut wrote: The current implementation of boot_relocate_fdt() places DT at the highest usable DRAM address, which is calculated as: env_get_bootm_low() + env_get_bootm_mapsize() which by default becomes gd-

Re: [PATCH][RFC] image: fdt: Fix DT relocation handling with multiple DRAM banks with gap

Hi Marek, On Wed, 21 Jul 2021 at 18:05, Marek Vasut wrote: > > The current implementation of boot_relocate_fdt() places DT at the > highest usable DRAM address, which is calculated as: > env_get_bootm_low() + env_get_bootm_mapsize() > which by default becomes gd->ram_base + gd->ram_size. > > Sy

[PATCH][RFC] image: fdt: Fix DT relocation handling with multiple DRAM banks with gap

The current implementation of boot_relocate_fdt() places DT at the highest usable DRAM address, which is calculated as: env_get_bootm_low() + env_get_bootm_mapsize() which by default becomes gd->ram_base + gd->ram_size. Systems like i.MX53 can have multiple DRAM banks with gap between them, e.g.