On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 04:48:17PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
> There is really no value to check empty spaces. That's why use
> ut_assert_nextlinen() instead of ut_assert_nextline().
> This change ensures that PINMUX_SIZE can be increased without changing
> tests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek
po 7. 3. 2022 v 16:48 odesÃlatel Michal Simek napsal:
>
> There is really no value to check empty spaces. That's why use
> ut_assert_nextlinen() instead of ut_assert_nextline().
> This change ensures that PINMUX_SIZE can be increased without changing
> tests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek
> ---
Hi Michal
On 3/7/22 16:48, Michal Simek wrote:
> There is really no value to check empty spaces. That's why use
> ut_assert_nextlinen() instead of ut_assert_nextline().
> This change ensures that PINMUX_SIZE can be increased without changing
> tests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek
> ---
>
> ht
There is really no value to check empty spaces. That's why use
ut_assert_nextlinen() instead of ut_assert_nextline().
This change ensures that PINMUX_SIZE can be increased without changing
tests.
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek
---
https://lore.kernel.org/all/3a6be84c8354f38754a9838670cc0319e84f29e8
4 matches
Mail list logo