> Hi Shirokov,
>
> On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 at 22:48, Shirokov Alexander
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello Simon,
> >
> > Thanks for your answer.Using 0x explicitly shows that we are working
> with HEX.
> > But without the prefix, it looks like a decimal number. And it's more
> confusing
> > when the number of bl
Hi Shirokov,
On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 at 22:48, Shirokov Alexander
wrote:
>
> Hello Simon,
>
> Thanks for your answer.Using 0x explicitly shows that we are working with HEX.
> But without the prefix, it looks like a decimal number. And it's more
> confusing
> when the number of blocks looks like a de
Hello Simon,
Thanks for your answer.Using 0x explicitly shows that we are working with
HEX.
But without the prefix, it looks like a decimal number. And it's more
confusing
when the number of blocks looks like a decimal but is interpreted as HEX.
Here is an example:
mmc write 0x4000 0x500
On Sun, 9 Apr 2023 at 07:01, Alexander Shirokov wrote:
>
> In the 'mmc write' command example, it writes 16 blocks (0x10). But the
> output contains 256 (0x100) blocks. This patch fixes the mismatch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Shirokov
> ---
> doc/usage/cmd/mmc.rst | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1
In the 'mmc write' command example, it writes 16 blocks (0x10). But the
output contains 256 (0x100) blocks. This patch fixes the mismatch.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Shirokov
---
doc/usage/cmd/mmc.rst | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/doc/usage/cmd/mmc.rst b/doc/u
5 matches
Mail list logo