On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 11:42 AM Jassi Brar wrote:
>
> On Thu, 4 May 2023 at 11:31, Ilias Apalodimas
> wrote:
> >
> > Replying to both Jassi and Tom here since it makes more sense,
> >
> > On Thu, 4 May 2023 at 19:19, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 10:39:06AM -0500, Jassi
On 5/4/23 17:19, Rob Herring wrote:
On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 9:01 AM Jassi Brar wrote:
On Thu, 4 May 2023 at 07:08, Ilias Apalodimas
wrote:
[...]
I'm assuming it's per partition type rather than storage medium (e.g.
SATA, USB, SD, NAND, SPI-NOR)? GPT, 'fixed-partitions', other DT
On Thu, 4 May 2023 at 11:31, Ilias Apalodimas
wrote:
>
> Replying to both Jassi and Tom here since it makes more sense,
>
> On Thu, 4 May 2023 at 19:19, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 10:39:06AM -0500, Jassi Brar wrote:
> > > On Thu, 4 May 2023 at 10:19, Rob Herring wrote:
> >
Replying to both Jassi and Tom here since it makes more sense,
On Thu, 4 May 2023 at 19:19, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 10:39:06AM -0500, Jassi Brar wrote:
> > On Thu, 4 May 2023 at 10:19, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 9:01 AM Jassi Brar
> > > wrote:
> > >
>
On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 10:39:06AM -0500, Jassi Brar wrote:
> On Thu, 4 May 2023 at 10:19, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 9:01 AM Jassi Brar
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I may be wrong, but I see having fwu properties contained within the
> > > fwu node is cleaner than having them
On Thu, 4 May 2023 at 10:19, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 9:01 AM Jassi Brar wrote:
>
> > I may be wrong, but I see having fwu properties contained within the
> > fwu node is cleaner than having them embedded into existing bindings
> > (potentially different classes in future).
On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 9:01 AM Jassi Brar wrote:
>
> On Thu, 4 May 2023 at 07:08, Ilias Apalodimas
> wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > > > > I'm assuming it's per partition type rather than storage medium (e.g.
> > > > > SATA, USB, SD, NAND, SPI-NOR)? GPT, 'fixed-partitions', other DT
> > > > > partition
On Thu, 4 May 2023 at 07:08, Ilias Apalodimas
wrote:
> [...]
>
> > > > I'm assuming it's per partition type rather than storage medium (e.g.
> > > > SATA, USB, SD, NAND, SPI-NOR)? GPT, 'fixed-partitions', other DT
> > > > partition bindings, etc. If so, then I'm really wondering why it's a
> > >
[...]
> > > I'm assuming it's per partition type rather than storage medium (e.g.
> > > SATA, USB, SD, NAND, SPI-NOR)? GPT, 'fixed-partitions', other DT
> > > partition bindings, etc. If so, then I'm really wondering why it's a
> > > standalone tree rather than integrated into those existing
hi Ilias,
On Thu, 4 May 2023 at 16:15, Ilias Apalodimas
wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 12:24:39PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 9:37 AM Ilias Apalodimas
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Krzysztof,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 07:38:11AM +0200, Krzysztof
Hi Rob,
On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 12:24:39PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 9:37 AM Ilias Apalodimas
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 07:38:11AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > On 11/04/2023 01:21, jaswinder.si...@linaro.org wrote:
> > > >
On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 9:37 AM Ilias Apalodimas
wrote:
>
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 07:38:11AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 11/04/2023 01:21, jaswinder.si...@linaro.org wrote:
> > > From: Jassi Brar
> > >
> > > Any requirement of FWU should not require changes to
On 03/05/2023 18:26, Tom Rini wrote:
I think we do not review U-Boot bindings usually, except these put in
the Linux kernel. There were few targeting U-Boot specifically (e.g.
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/u-boot.yaml and
On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 04:54:45PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 03/05/2023 16:37, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 07:38:11AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 11/04/2023 01:21, jaswinder.si...@linaro.org wrote:
> >>> From: Jassi Brar
>
On 03/05/2023 16:37, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 07:38:11AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 11/04/2023 01:21, jaswinder.si...@linaro.org wrote:
>>> From: Jassi Brar
>>>
>>> Any requirement of FWU should not require changes to bindings
>>> of other
Hi Krzysztof,
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 07:38:11AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 11/04/2023 01:21, jaswinder.si...@linaro.org wrote:
> > From: Jassi Brar
> >
> > Any requirement of FWU should not require changes to bindings
> > of other subsystems. For example, for mtd-backed storage we
>
On 4/11/23 07:38, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 11/04/2023 01:21, jaswinder.si...@linaro.org wrote:
From: Jassi Brar
Any requirement of FWU should not require changes to bindings
of other subsystems. For example, for mtd-backed storage we
can do without requiring 'fixed-partitions'
On 11/04/2023 01:21, jaswinder.si...@linaro.org wrote:
> From: Jassi Brar
>
> Any requirement of FWU should not require changes to bindings
> of other subsystems. For example, for mtd-backed storage we
> can do without requiring 'fixed-partitions' children to also
> carry 'uuid', a property
From: Jassi Brar
Any requirement of FWU should not require changes to bindings
of other subsystems. For example, for mtd-backed storage we
can do without requiring 'fixed-partitions' children to also
carry 'uuid', a property which is non-standard and not in the
bindings.
There exists no code
19 matches
Mail list logo
