Hey Heinrich,
On 27.02.22 16:33, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 2/27/22 15:13, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 27.02.22 14:07, Mark Kettenis wrote:
From: Alexander Graf
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2022 13:18:56 +0100
For targets that enable ACPI, we should not pass Device Trees into
the payload. However, our
On 2/27/22 15:13, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 27.02.22 14:07, Mark Kettenis wrote:
From: Alexander Graf
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2022 13:18:56 +0100
For targets that enable ACPI, we should not pass Device Trees into
the payload. However, our distro boot logic always passes the builtin
DT as an argument
On 27.02.22 14:07, Mark Kettenis wrote:
From: Alexander Graf
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2022 13:18:56 +0100
For targets that enable ACPI, we should not pass Device Trees into
the payload. However, our distro boot logic always passes the builtin
DT as an argument.
To make it easy to use ACPI with dist
> From: Alexander Graf
> Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2022 13:18:56 +0100
>
> For targets that enable ACPI, we should not pass Device Trees into
> the payload. However, our distro boot logic always passes the builtin
> DT as an argument.
>
> To make it easy to use ACPI with distro boot, let's just ignore t
For targets that enable ACPI, we should not pass Device Trees into
the payload. However, our distro boot logic always passes the builtin
DT as an argument.
To make it easy to use ACPI with distro boot, let's just ignore the DT
argument to bootefi when ACPI is enabled. That way, we can successfully
5 matches
Mail list logo