Hi Tom,
On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 3:22 PM Tom Rini wrote:
> How is the fdt at 0x4300 not being clobbered if the initramfs at
> 0x4380 is? Is it because it's just enough of a bad spot that we
> relocate the fdt out of the way? With the kernel at 0x4048
> everything else is too low. kerne
On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 03:07:47PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 3:03 PM Tom Rini wrote:
>
> > Shouldn't fdt_addr_r change too? This is making me suspect the whole map
> > is too small for safety, how much memory does the platform have at
> > minimum?
>
> It h
Hi Tom,
On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 3:03 PM Tom Rini wrote:
> Shouldn't fdt_addr_r change too? This is making me suspect the whole map
> is too small for safety, how much memory does the platform have at
> minimum?
It has 2GB of RAM.
Changing only initrd_addr and keeping fdt_addr_r unchanged allows
On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 02:57:27PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> From: Fabio Estevam
>
> Booting an initramfs with the current address may lead to initramfs
> corruption and boot failure.
>
> Move it 0x4800 which avoids initramfs overlap and allows a
> successful initramfs boot.
>
> Signed-
From: Fabio Estevam
Booting an initramfs with the current address may lead to initramfs
corruption and boot failure.
Move it 0x4800 which avoids initramfs overlap and allows a
successful initramfs boot.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam
---
include/configs/msc_sm2s_imx8mp.h | 2 +-
1 file chan
5 matches
Mail list logo
