Re: [PATCH] mtd: gpmi: fix the gpmi bch setting unalignment issue

2022-03-23 Thread Han Xu
On 22/03/22 12:34PM, Tim Harvey wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 1:37 PM Han Xu wrote: > > > > The code change fixed the kernel gpmi bch setting not aligned with > > u-boot settings issue. It still uses the legacy bch geometry as the > > default option. If users need to choose the minimum ecc stre

Re: [PATCH] mtd: gpmi: fix the gpmi bch setting unalignment issue

2022-03-22 Thread Tim Harvey
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 1:37 PM Han Xu wrote: > > The code change fixed the kernel gpmi bch setting not aligned with > u-boot settings issue. It still uses the legacy bch geometry as the > default option. If users need to choose the minimum ecc strength that > NAND chips required, it can be enable

Re: [PATCH] mtd: gpmi: fix the gpmi bch setting unalignment issue

2022-03-22 Thread Sean Nyekjaer
Hi Han, On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 03:18:34PM -0500, Han Xu wrote: > The code change fixed the kernel gpmi bch setting not aligned with > u-boot settings issue. It still uses the legacy bch geometry as the AFAIK there is no merged changes in the kernel regarding this. The breaking change was done in

[PATCH] mtd: gpmi: fix the gpmi bch setting unalignment issue

2022-03-21 Thread Han Xu
The code change fixed the kernel gpmi bch setting not aligned with u-boot settings issue. It still uses the legacy bch geometry as the default option. If users need to choose the minimum ecc strength that NAND chips required, it can be enabled by either adding DT flag "fsl,use-minimum-ecc" or CONFI