On Sun, Jun 05, 2022 at 03:44:15AM +0300, Ramon Fried wrote:
> The convinience functions are not that small and they caused
> bloated text segments because of their usage.
> There was no need to inline them in the first place, as
> they're not part of a fastpath.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ramon Fried
>
On Sun, Jun 05, 2022 at 03:44:15AM +0300, Ramon Fried wrote:
> The convinience functions are not that small and they caused
convenience
> bloated text segments because of their usage.
> There was no need to inline them in the first place, as
> they're not part of a fastpath.
>
> Signed-off-by: R
On Sun, Jun 5, 2022 at 9:59 AM Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
wrote:
>
> Hi Ramon
>
> Il dom 5 giu 2022, 02:44 Ramon Fried ha scritto:
>>
>> The convinience functions are not that small and they caused
>> bloated text segments because of their usage.
>> There was no need to inline them in the first
On Sun, 5 Jun 2022 03:44:15 +0300
Ramon Fried wrote:
> The convinience functions are not that small and they caused
> bloated text segments because of their usage.
> There was no need to inline them in the first place, as
> they're not part of a fastpath.
Reviewed-by: Marek Behún
Hi Ramon
Il dom 5 giu 2022, 02:44 Ramon Fried ha scritto:
> The convinience functions are not that small and they caused
> bloated text segments because of their usage.
> There was no need to inline them in the first place, as
> they're not part of a fastpath.
>
Please give numbers here in com
The convinience functions are not that small and they caused
bloated text segments because of their usage.
There was no need to inline them in the first place, as
they're not part of a fastpath.
Signed-off-by: Ramon Fried
---
drivers/net/phy/phy.c | 174 ++
in
6 matches
Mail list logo
