Hi John,
I have pick below patch for gpio bank support, which is the same
logic in kernel and other SoCs.
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20230213222742.135093-2-macroalph...@gmail.com/
Thanks,
- Kever
On 2023/1/18 02:15, John Keeping wrote:
Upstream device trees now
On 1/18/23 17:13, John Keeping wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 08:52:22PM +0100, Johan Jonker wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 1/17/23 19:15, John Keeping wrote:
>>> Upstream device trees now use standard node names like "gpio@ff..." but
>>> the rk_gpio driver expects a name like "gpio0@ff..." (note the inde
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 08:52:22PM +0100, Johan Jonker wrote:
>
>
> On 1/17/23 19:15, John Keeping wrote:
> > Upstream device trees now use standard node names like "gpio@ff..." but
> > the rk_gpio driver expects a name like "gpio0@ff..." (note the index
> > before the @).
> >
> > This is not a
On 1/17/23 19:15, John Keeping wrote:
> Upstream device trees now use standard node names like "gpio@ff..." but
> the rk_gpio driver expects a name like "gpio0@ff..." (note the index
> before the @).
>
> This is not a change that can be made in a -u-boot.dtsi file, so
> updating to the latest u
Upstream device trees now use standard node names like "gpio@ff..." but
the rk_gpio driver expects a name like "gpio0@ff..." (note the index
before the @).
This is not a change that can be made in a -u-boot.dtsi file, so
updating to the latest upstream device trees requires updating the
driver.
O
5 matches
Mail list logo