Re: [PATCH] rockchip: derive GPIO bank from alias if available

2023-02-22 Thread Kever Yang
Hi John,     I have pick below patch for gpio bank support, which is the same logic in kernel and other SoCs. https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20230213222742.135093-2-macroalph...@gmail.com/ Thanks, - Kever On 2023/1/18 02:15, John Keeping wrote: Upstream device trees now

Re: [PATCH] rockchip: derive GPIO bank from alias if available

2023-01-19 Thread Johan Jonker
On 1/18/23 17:13, John Keeping wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 08:52:22PM +0100, Johan Jonker wrote: >> >> >> On 1/17/23 19:15, John Keeping wrote: >>> Upstream device trees now use standard node names like "gpio@ff..." but >>> the rk_gpio driver expects a name like "gpio0@ff..." (note the inde

Re: [PATCH] rockchip: derive GPIO bank from alias if available

2023-01-18 Thread John Keeping
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 08:52:22PM +0100, Johan Jonker wrote: > > > On 1/17/23 19:15, John Keeping wrote: > > Upstream device trees now use standard node names like "gpio@ff..." but > > the rk_gpio driver expects a name like "gpio0@ff..." (note the index > > before the @). > > > > This is not a

Re: [PATCH] rockchip: derive GPIO bank from alias if available

2023-01-17 Thread Johan Jonker
On 1/17/23 19:15, John Keeping wrote: > Upstream device trees now use standard node names like "gpio@ff..." but > the rk_gpio driver expects a name like "gpio0@ff..." (note the index > before the @). > > This is not a change that can be made in a -u-boot.dtsi file, so > updating to the latest u

[PATCH] rockchip: derive GPIO bank from alias if available

2023-01-17 Thread John Keeping
Upstream device trees now use standard node names like "gpio@ff..." but the rk_gpio driver expects a name like "gpio0@ff..." (note the index before the @). This is not a change that can be made in a -u-boot.dtsi file, so updating to the latest upstream device trees requires updating the driver. O