On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 09:44:13PM +, Jonas Karlman wrote:
> spl_board_prepare_for_boot() is not called before jumping/invoking atf,
> optee, opensbi or linux images.
>
> Jump to image at the end of board_init_r() to fix this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonas Karlman
> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass
On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 07:56:49AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 02:57:42AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > On 9/27/23 23:44, Jonas Karlman wrote:
> > > spl_board_prepare_for_boot() is not called before jumping/invoking atf,
> > > optee, opensbi or linux images.
> > >
> >
On 29.09.23 13:56, Tom Rini wrote:
On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 02:57:42AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 9/27/23 23:44, Jonas Karlman wrote:
spl_board_prepare_for_boot() is not called before jumping/invoking atf,
optee, opensbi or linux images.
Jump to image at the end of board_init_r() to
On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 02:57:42AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 9/27/23 23:44, Jonas Karlman wrote:
> > spl_board_prepare_for_boot() is not called before jumping/invoking atf,
> > optee, opensbi or linux images.
> >
> > Jump to image at the end of board_init_r() to fix this.
> >
> >
> We should understand the implications of your patch on the code size. If
> it leads to binary code growth, we should evaluate alternatives.
This is not my patch, but Jonas'. But sure.
Cheers.
On 9/29/23 09:55, Ferass El Hafidi wrote:
Hi Heinrich,
On Fri Sep 29, 2023 at 2:57 AM CEST, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
In SPL we are fighting for every byte of binary size.
What is the impact of this change on the code size?
I would expect that your increasing it; especially if only one of
On Fri Sep 29, 2023 at 1:42 AM CEST, Simon Glass wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Sept 2023 at 15:44, Jonas Karlman wrote:
> >
> > spl_board_prepare_for_boot() is not called before jumping/invoking atf,
> > optee, opensbi or linux images.
> >
> > Jump to image at the end of board_init_r() to fix this.
> >
> >
Hi Heinrich,
On Fri Sep 29, 2023 at 2:57 AM CEST, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> In SPL we are fighting for every byte of binary size.
>
> What is the impact of this change on the code size?
>
> I would expect that your increasing it; especially if only one of the
> CONFIG_OPTIONS is enabled.
>
>
On 9/27/23 23:44, Jonas Karlman wrote:
spl_board_prepare_for_boot() is not called before jumping/invoking atf,
optee, opensbi or linux images.
Jump to image at the end of board_init_r() to fix this.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Karlman
---
This patch have dependencies on the following patches:
spl:
On Wed, 27 Sept 2023 at 15:44, Jonas Karlman wrote:
>
> spl_board_prepare_for_boot() is not called before jumping/invoking atf,
> optee, opensbi or linux images.
>
> Jump to image at the end of board_init_r() to fix this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonas Karlman
> ---
> This patch have dependencies on
spl_board_prepare_for_boot() is not called before jumping/invoking atf,
optee, opensbi or linux images.
Jump to image at the end of board_init_r() to fix this.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Karlman
---
This patch have dependencies on the following patches:
spl: add __noreturn attribute to
11 matches
Mail list logo