Re: [PATCH] test: Have test_fs work with non-functional guestmount tools

On 7/7/20 12:46 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 12:34:19PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 7/7/20 9:53 AM, Tom Rini wrote: >>> Since 2011 Ubuntu has intentionally broken support for guestmount[1] by >>> default and requires sysadmin intervention to re-enable support. This >>> in

Re: [PATCH] test: Have test_fs work with non-functional guestmount tools

On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 12:34:19PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 7/7/20 9:53 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > > Since 2011 Ubuntu has intentionally broken support for guestmount[1] by > > default and requires sysadmin intervention to re-enable support. This > > in turn exposed that in our tests if

Re: [PATCH] test: Have test_fs work with non-functional guestmount tools

On 7/7/20 9:53 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > Since 2011 Ubuntu has intentionally broken support for guestmount[1] by > default and requires sysadmin intervention to re-enable support. This > in turn exposed that in our tests if guestmount is available but fails > we do not fall back to trying to use

[PATCH] test: Have test_fs work with non-functional guestmount tools

Since 2011 Ubuntu has intentionally broken support for guestmount[1] by default and requires sysadmin intervention to re-enable support. This in turn exposed that in our tests if guestmount is available but fails we do not fall back to trying to use sudo. Restructure our code to try sudo if