On Friday 19 August 2022 10:20:46 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Friday 19 August 2022 09:43:59 Stefan Roese wrote:
> > Testing on the theadorable Armada XP platform has shown, thaz using the
> > current value of 1000ms as response timeout does not result in reliable
> > booting via kwboot. Using 10ms seem
On 19.08.22 09:43, Stefan Roese wrote:
Testing on the theadorable Armada XP platform has shown, thaz using the
current value of 1000ms as response timeout does not result in reliable
booting via kwboot. Using 10ms seems to be much better. So let's change
this value to this 10ms instead.
Signed-o
On Friday 19 August 2022 09:43:59 Stefan Roese wrote:
> Testing on the theadorable Armada XP platform has shown, thaz using the
> current value of 1000ms as response timeout does not result in reliable
> booting via kwboot. Using 10ms seems to be much better. So let's change
> this value to this 10
Testing on the theadorable Armada XP platform has shown, thaz using the
current value of 1000ms as response timeout does not result in reliable
booting via kwboot. Using 10ms seems to be much better. So let's change
this value to this 10ms instead.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese
---
tools/kwboot.c
4 matches
Mail list logo