On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 15:57:17 +0200, Justin Swartz wrote:
> The statement that prints the ELF object type value assumes that "%lx"
> (long unsigned int, hexadecimal) is suitable for printing a uint64_t
> typed value. While this may seem to work for some machines, ie. amd64,
> it isn't ideal on a 32
The statement that prints the ELF object type value assumes that "%lx"
(long unsigned int, hexadecimal) is suitable for printing a uint64_t
typed value. While this may seem to work for some machines, ie. amd64,
it isn't ideal on a 32-bit system, such as x86 where uint64_t is likely
to be equivalent
2 matches
Mail list logo
