On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 06:09:46PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Commit c0fce929564f("vexpress64: fvp: enable OF_CONTROL") added code to
> consider a potential DTB address being passed in the x0 register, or
> revert to the built-in DTB otherwise.
> The former case was used when using the boot-wr
On 21/09/2022 18:09, Andre Przywara wrote:
Commit c0fce929564f("vexpress64: fvp: enable OF_CONTROL") added code to
consider a potential DTB address being passed in the x0 register, or
revert to the built-in DTB otherwise.
The former case was used when using the boot-wrapper, to which we sell
U-Bo
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 01:03:04AM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Sep 2022 13:56:44 -0400
> Tom Rini wrote:
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 06:09:46PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> > > Commit c0fce929564f("vexpress64: fvp: enable OF_CONTROL") added code to
> > > consider a
On Wed, 21 Sep 2022 13:56:44 -0400
Tom Rini wrote:
Hi Tom,
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 06:09:46PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> > Commit c0fce929564f("vexpress64: fvp: enable OF_CONTROL") added code to
> > consider a potential DTB address being passed in the x0 register, or
> > revert to the buil
On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 06:09:46PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Commit c0fce929564f("vexpress64: fvp: enable OF_CONTROL") added code to
> consider a potential DTB address being passed in the x0 register, or
> revert to the built-in DTB otherwise.
> The former case was used when using the boot-wra
Commit c0fce929564f("vexpress64: fvp: enable OF_CONTROL") added code to
consider a potential DTB address being passed in the x0 register, or
revert to the built-in DTB otherwise.
The former case was used when using the boot-wrapper, to which we sell
U-Boot as a Linux kernel. The latter was meant fo
6 matches
Mail list logo