Hi Sughosh, Tom,
On 01/10/24 14:19, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 at 11:37, Vaishnav Achath wrote:
Hi Tom,
On 21/09/24 08:09, Tom Rini wrote:
On Mon, 16 Sep 2024 20:50:23 +0530, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
Rework the logic to verify the load address so that address re-use is
not an issue
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 at 11:37, Vaishnav Achath wrote:
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> On 21/09/24 08:09, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 Sep 2024 20:50:23 +0530, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
> >
> >> Rework the logic to verify the load address so that address re-use is
> >> not an issue.
> >>
> >>
> >> Note: To be applied on
Hi Tom,
On 21/09/24 08:09, Tom Rini wrote:
On Mon, 16 Sep 2024 20:50:23 +0530, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
Rework the logic to verify the load address so that address re-use is
not an issue.
Note: To be applied on next, on top of
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20240913073251.228652
On Mon, 16 Sep 2024 20:50:23 +0530, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
> Rework the logic to verify the load address so that address re-use is
> not an issue.
>
>
> Note: To be applied on next, on top of
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20240913073251.2286529-2-prasad.kumm...@amd.com/
>
> [.
Rework the logic to verify the load address so that address re-use is
not an issue.
Note: To be applied on next, on top of
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20240913073251.2286529-2-prasad.kumm...@amd.com/
Sughosh Ganu (2):
tftp: rework the logic to validate the load address
w
5 matches
Mail list logo