Re: [PATCH 00/27] dm: Change the way sequence numbers are implemented

Hi Michal, Heinrich, On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 00:54, Michal Simek wrote: > > > > On 11. 12. 20 8:42, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > On 12/11/20 8:28 AM, Michal Simek wrote: > >> Hi Simon, > >> > >> On 10. 12. 20 18:46, Simon Glass wrote: > >>> Hi Michal, > >>> > >>> On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 10:33,

Re: [PATCH 00/27] dm: Change the way sequence numbers are implemented

On 11. 12. 20 8:42, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > On 12/11/20 8:28 AM, Michal Simek wrote: >> Hi Simon, >> >> On 10. 12. 20 18:46, Simon Glass wrote: >>> Hi Michal, >>> >>> On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 10:33, Michal Simek >>> wrote: Hi Simon, On 10. 12. 20 18:27, Simon Glass

Re: [PATCH 00/27] dm: Change the way sequence numbers are implemented

Hi Simon, On 10. 12. 20 18:46, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Michal, > > On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 10:33, Michal Simek wrote: >> >> Hi Simon, >> >> On 10. 12. 20 18:27, Simon Glass wrote: >>> Hi Michal, >>> >>> On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 00:34, Michal Simek wrote: Hi, On 09. 12. 20

Re: [PATCH 00/27] dm: Change the way sequence numbers are implemented

On 12/11/20 8:28 AM, Michal Simek wrote: Hi Simon, On 10. 12. 20 18:46, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Michal, On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 10:33, Michal Simek wrote: Hi Simon, On 10. 12. 20 18:27, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Michal, On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 00:34, Michal Simek wrote: Hi, On 09. 12. 20

Re: [PATCH 00/27] dm: Change the way sequence numbers are implemented

Hi Michal, On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 10:33, Michal Simek wrote: > > Hi Simon, > > On 10. 12. 20 18:27, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Michal, > > > > On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 00:34, Michal Simek wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> On 09. 12. 20 17:30, Michael Walle wrote: > >>> Hi Simon, > >>> > >>> Am

Re: [PATCH 00/27] dm: Change the way sequence numbers are implemented

Hi Simon, On 10. 12. 20 18:27, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Michal, > > On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 00:34, Michal Simek wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On 09. 12. 20 17:30, Michael Walle wrote: >>> Hi Simon, >>> >>> Am 2020-12-09 17:23, schrieb Simon Glass: On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 15:52, Michael Walle wrote:

Re: [PATCH 00/27] dm: Change the way sequence numbers are implemented

Hi Michal, On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 00:34, Michal Simek wrote: > > Hi, > > On 09. 12. 20 17:30, Michael Walle wrote: > > Hi Simon, > > > > Am 2020-12-09 17:23, schrieb Simon Glass: > >> On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 15:52, Michael Walle wrote: > >>> Am 2020-11-30 02:53, schrieb Simon Glass: > >>> > At

Re: [PATCH 00/27] dm: Change the way sequence numbers are implemented

Hi, On 09. 12. 20 17:30, Michael Walle wrote: > Hi Simon, > > Am 2020-12-09 17:23, schrieb Simon Glass: >> On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 15:52, Michael Walle wrote: >>> Am 2020-11-30 02:53, schrieb Simon Glass: >>> > At present each device has two sequence numbers, with 'req_seq' being >>> > set up at

Re: [PATCH 00/27] dm: Change the way sequence numbers are implemented

Hi Simon, Am 2020-12-09 17:23, schrieb Simon Glass: On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 15:52, Michael Walle wrote: Am 2020-11-30 02:53, schrieb Simon Glass: > At present each device has two sequence numbers, with 'req_seq' being > set up at bind time and 'seq' at probe time. The idea is that devices > can

Re: [PATCH 00/27] dm: Change the way sequence numbers are implemented

Hi Tom, On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 at 09:19, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 11:52:07PM +0100, Michael Walle wrote: > > Hi Simon, > > > > Am 2020-11-30 02:53, schrieb Simon Glass: > > > At present each device has two sequence numbers, with 'req_seq' being > > > set up at bind time and 'seq'

Re: [PATCH 00/27] dm: Change the way sequence numbers are implemented

Hi Michael, On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 15:52, Michael Walle wrote: > > Hi Simon, > > Am 2020-11-30 02:53, schrieb Simon Glass: > > At present each device has two sequence numbers, with 'req_seq' being > > set up at bind time and 'seq' at probe time. The idea is that devices > > can 'request' a

Re: [PATCH 00/27] dm: Change the way sequence numbers are implemented

On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 11:52:07PM +0100, Michael Walle wrote: > Hi Simon, > > Am 2020-11-30 02:53, schrieb Simon Glass: > > At present each device has two sequence numbers, with 'req_seq' being > > set up at bind time and 'seq' at probe time. The idea is that devices > > can 'request' a sequence

Re: [PATCH 00/27] dm: Change the way sequence numbers are implemented

Hi Simon, Am 2020-11-30 02:53, schrieb Simon Glass: At present each device has two sequence numbers, with 'req_seq' being set up at bind time and 'seq' at probe time. The idea is that devices can 'request' a sequence number and then the conflicts are resolved when the device is probed. This

Re: [PATCH 00/27] dm: Change the way sequence numbers are implemented

Hi Heinrich, On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 at 01:32, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > On 11/30/20 2:53 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > > At present each device has two sequence numbers, with 'req_seq' being > > set up at bind time and 'seq' at probe time. The idea is that devices > > can 'request' a sequence number

Re: [PATCH 00/27] dm: Change the way sequence numbers are implemented

On 11/30/20 2:53 AM, Simon Glass wrote: At present each device has two sequence numbers, with 'req_seq' being set up at bind time and 'seq' at probe time. The idea is that devices can 'request' a sequence number and then the conflicts are resolved when the device is probed. This makes things

[PATCH 00/27] dm: Change the way sequence numbers are implemented

At present each device has two sequence numbers, with 'req_seq' being set up at bind time and 'seq' at probe time. The idea is that devices can 'request' a sequence number and then the conflicts are resolved when the device is probed. This makes things complicated in a few cases, since we don't