Re: [PATCH 1/1] dm: fix logic of lists_bind_fdt()

On 7/12/22 12:58, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Heinrich, > > On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 at 00:25, Heinrich Schuchardt > wrote: >> >> If parameter drv of lists_bind_fdt() is specified, we shall bind only to >> this very driver and to no other. >> >> If the driver drv has an of_match property, we shall only bin

Re: [PATCH 1/1] dm: fix logic of lists_bind_fdt()

On 7/12/22 12:58, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Heinrich, On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 at 00:25, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: If parameter drv of lists_bind_fdt() is specified, we shall bind only to this very driver and to no other. If the driver drv has an of_match property, we shall only bind to the driver i

Re: [PATCH 1/1] dm: fix logic of lists_bind_fdt()

Hi Heinrich, On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 at 00:25, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > If parameter drv of lists_bind_fdt() is specified, we shall bind only to > this very driver and to no other. > > If the driver drv has an of_match property, we shall only bind to the > driver if it matches the compatible st

[PATCH 1/1] dm: fix logic of lists_bind_fdt()

If parameter drv of lists_bind_fdt() is specified, we shall bind only to this very driver and to no other. If the driver drv has an of_match property, we shall only bind to the driver if it matches the compatible string of the device. Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt --- drivers/core/lists.c