Re: [PATCH 1/2] sunxi: Skip MMC0 init when its pinmux conflicts with UART0

2022-05-24 Thread Andre Przywara
On Sun, 10 Apr 2022 00:13:33 -0500 Samuel Holland wrote: > Currently, selecting UART0_PORT_F entirely disables MMC support on sunxi > platforms. But this is a bigger hammer then needed. Muxing UART0 to the > pins on port F only causes a conflict with MMC0, so minimize the impact > by specifically

Re: [PATCH 1/2] sunxi: Skip MMC0 init when its pinmux conflicts with UART0

2022-04-26 Thread Andre Przywara
On Sun, 10 Apr 2022 00:13:33 -0500 Samuel Holland wrote: > Currently, selecting UART0_PORT_F entirely disables MMC support on sunxi > platforms. But this is a bigger hammer then needed. Muxing UART0 to the > pins on port F only causes a conflict with MMC0, so minimize the impact > by specifically

[PATCH 1/2] sunxi: Skip MMC0 init when its pinmux conflicts with UART0

2022-04-09 Thread Samuel Holland
Currently, selecting UART0_PORT_F entirely disables MMC support on sunxi platforms. But this is a bigger hammer then needed. Muxing UART0 to the pins on port F only causes a conflict with MMC0, so minimize the impact by specifically skipping MMC0 init. We can continue to use MMC1/2 if those are ena